From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Test oa buffer sizes
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:34:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85seob14qa.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250215010628.1639986-10-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:06:24 -0800, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
> Introduce oa buffer size test separately. Pick a random valid buffer
> size for the test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_oa.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> index 03d223df4..ee87b7338 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,23 @@ struct accumulator {
> uint64_t deltas[MAX_RAW_OA_COUNTERS];
> };
>
> +struct oa_buf_size {
> + char name[12];
> + uint32_t size;
> +} buf_sizes[] = {
> + { "128K", SZ_128K },
> + { "256K", SZ_256K },
> + { "512K", SZ_512K },
> + { "1M", SZ_1M },
> + { "2M", SZ_2M },
> + { "4M", SZ_4M },
> + { "8M", SZ_8M },
> + { "16M", SZ_16M },
> + { "32M", SZ_32M },
> + { "64M", SZ_64M },
> + { "128M", SZ_128M },
Would you have the running time for these? Hopefully not too huge for the
large buffer sizes, even if we are running just one of them? And what about
slower platforms?
That was the reason we restricted OA buffer size to just 16 M.
This is what I measured here:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/627269/?series=142128&rev=1
$ sudo ./build/tests/xe_oa --r oa-buffer-size
IGT-Version: 1.29-g724fd0b79 (x86_64) (Linux: 6.12.0-rc4+ x86_64)
Using IGT_SRANDOM=1733459091 for randomisation
Opened device: /dev/dri/card0
Starting subtest: oa-buffer-size
Starting dynamic subtest: 8MB
Dynamic subtest 8MB: SUCCESS (0.403s)
Starting dynamic subtest: 32MB
Dynamic subtest 32MB: SUCCESS (1.595s)
Starting dynamic subtest: 128MB
Dynamic subtest 128MB: SUCCESS (6.326s)
Subtest oa-buffer-size: SUCCESS (8.324s)
> +};
> +
> /* OA unit types */
> enum {
> OAG,
> @@ -305,6 +322,7 @@ static struct intel_mmio_data mmio_data;
> static igt_render_copyfunc_t render_copy;
> static uint32_t rc_width, rc_height;
> static uint32_t buffer_fill_size;
> +static uint32_t num_buf_sizes;
>
> static struct intel_xe_perf_metric_set *metric_set(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> {
> @@ -1094,6 +1112,7 @@ init_sys_info(void)
> rc_width = 1920;
> rc_height = 1080;
> buffer_fill_size = SZ_16M;
> + num_buf_sizes = ARRAY_SIZE(buf_sizes);
> oa_exponent_default = max_oa_exponent_for_period_lte(1000000);
>
> default_oa_buffer_size = get_default_oa_buffer_size(drm_fd);
> @@ -4805,6 +4824,17 @@ igt_main
> __for_one_hwe_in_oag(hwe)
> test_buffer_fill(hwe);
>
> + /**
> + * SUBTEST: buffer-size
> + * Description: Test various OA buffer sizes
> + */
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("buffer-size") {
> + long k = random() % num_buf_sizes;
> +
> + __for_one_hwe_in_oag_w_arg(hwe, buf_sizes[k].name)
> + test_non_zero_reason(hwe, buf_sizes[k].size);
> + }
> +
> igt_subtest_with_dynamic("non-zero-reason")
> __for_one_hwe_in_oag(hwe)
> test_non_zero_reason(hwe, 0);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-15 1:06 [PATCH 00/13] Some refactor, rewrite and fixes for OA tests Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 01/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Use static for global variables Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-18 17:28 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 02/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Drop unused macro Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-18 17:32 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 03/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Rename oa_exp_1_millisec to oa_exponent_default Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 2:42 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-22 3:35 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 04/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Use default exponent for some tests Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 2:43 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-22 3:37 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 05/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Use same render copy width and height across tests Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 2:48 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 06/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Rewrite the polling small buf test Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-24 21:35 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-25 4:26 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-25 22:51 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-27 3:45 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 07/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Simplify the buffer-fill test Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-24 21:33 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 08/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Use default buffer size for non-zero reason Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 3:10 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 09/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Test oa buffer sizes Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-18 18:34 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2025-02-18 18:38 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-18 18:44 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 0:13 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-22 1:12 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 3:14 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 10/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Rewrite enable-disable test Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-25 0:30 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-25 2:54 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-25 22:25 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 11/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Enable unprivileged-single-ctx-counters and fix it Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-25 3:53 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 12/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Fix mmio_trigger_reports testing Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 3:32 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 13/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Set boundaries for OA exponent test Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 3:17 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 2:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Some refactor, rewrite and fixes for OA tests Patchwork
2025-02-15 2:23 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-18 18:32 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-16 8:05 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-02-18 18:38 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-18 18:40 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85seob14qa.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox