From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v3 3/3] tests/intel/xe_oa: Remove hardcoded time heuristics
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:37:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85wmeyec8v.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250113061949.753864-4-sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:19:49 -0800, Sai Teja Pottumuttu wrote:
>
> Some tests in xe_oa tests have hardcoded timing heuristics. Refactor it to
> make it more robust and reliable. The patch extends the wait time logically
> but usually it would take a single iteration for the required reports to be
> available so wait time doesn't change much.
>
> v2:
> - Extend commit message [Lucas]
> - Make wait function more generic [Lucas]
>
> v3:
> - Change wait function name [Ashutosh]
> - Address nits [Ashutosh]
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_oa.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> index cd081ecff..df7fa3229 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> @@ -4367,6 +4367,26 @@ static void map_oa_buffer_forked_access(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instanc
> munmap(vaddr, size);
> }
>
> +static void mmap_wait_for_periodic_reports(void *oa_vaddr, uint32_t n,
> + const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> +{
> + uint32_t period_us = oa_exponent_to_ns(oa_exp_1_millisec) / 1000;
> + struct intel_xe_perf_metric_set *test_set = metric_set(hwe);
> + uint64_t fmt = test_set->perf_oa_format;
> + uint32_t num_periodic_reports = 0;
> + uint32_t *reports;
> +
> + while (num_periodic_reports < n) {
> + usleep(4 * n * period_us);
> + num_periodic_reports = 0;
> + for (reports = (uint32_t *)oa_vaddr;
> + reports[0] && oa_timestamp(reports, fmt) && oa_report_is_periodic(reports);
> + reports += get_oa_format(fmt).size) {
> + num_periodic_reports++;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void check_reports(void *oa_vaddr, uint32_t oa_size,
> const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> {
> @@ -4396,12 +4416,10 @@ static void check_reports_from_mapped_buffer(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_in
> {
> void *vaddr;
> uint32_t size;
> - uint32_t period_us = oa_exponent_to_ns(oa_exp_1_millisec) / 1000;
>
> vaddr = map_oa_buffer(&size);
>
> - /* wait for approx 100 reports */
> - usleep(100 * period_us);
> + mmap_wait_for_periodic_reports(vaddr, 10, hwe);
> check_reports(vaddr, size, hwe);
>
> munmap(vaddr, size);
> @@ -4426,12 +4444,11 @@ static void closed_fd_and_unmapped_access(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_insta
> };
> void *vaddr;
> uint32_t size;
> - uint32_t period_us = oa_exponent_to_ns(oa_exp_1_millisec) / 1000;
>
> stream_fd = __perf_open(drm_fd, ¶m, false);
> vaddr = map_oa_buffer(&size);
>
> - usleep(100 * period_us);
> + mmap_wait_for_periodic_reports(vaddr, 10, hwe);
> check_reports(vaddr, size, hwe);
>
> munmap(vaddr, size);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-13 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 6:19 [PATCH i-g-t v3 0/3] Miscellaneous OA Refactors Sai Teja Pottumuttu
2025-01-13 6:19 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 1/3] tests/intel/xe_oa: Remove unused function arguments Sai Teja Pottumuttu
2025-01-13 6:19 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 2/3] tests/intel/xe_oa: Reduce the number of mmap reports checked Sai Teja Pottumuttu
2025-01-13 19:22 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-01-13 6:19 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 3/3] tests/intel/xe_oa: Remove hardcoded time heuristics Sai Teja Pottumuttu
2025-01-13 19:37 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2025-01-13 21:17 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Miscellaneous OA Refactors (rev3) Patchwork
2025-01-13 21:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-01-15 7:13 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-17 8:00 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85wmeyec8v.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox