Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_render: Rewrite test to take advantage of igt_display.

[Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>]

Hey,

Op 30-01-18 om 09:01 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:22:07PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 24-01-18 om 12:08 schreef Chris Wilson:
>>> Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2018-01-24 10:25:00)
>>>> This test was taking ~100s for each subtest, and both tests were the same,
>>>> but required the user to pay attention. I've changed it to automated
>>>> checking with CRC, and removed the subtests.
>>> What do we do here that isn't covered by kms_frontbuffer*? My guess
>>> would be do simple testing of more configurations (as opposed to
>>> kms_frontbuffer that does lots of different drawing to the same
>>> configuration).
>> Hm probably right. I wouldn't mind removing it too, to be honest..
> Originally added by Imre and reviewed by Rodrigo, but no mention why we
> need this testcase:
>
> commit 528b1f381c4e67c2e63e23b5597070fffe8033d6
> Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Date:   Thu May 30 22:59:59 2013 +0300
>
>     tests: add kms_render
>     
>     Add a test going through all connectors/crtcs/modes/formats painting to
>     a front FB with CPU or painting to a back FB with CPU and blitting it
>     to the front FB.
>     
>     Only formats understood by cairo are supported for now.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>     Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
>
> I'm voting for removal too, assuming Imre doesn't come up with a very good
> reason for why we need it.
> -Daniel

Ok I'll wait a few days longer then remove this test. kms_frontbuffer_tracking probably superceeds it.

~Maarten

_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev