public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Yadav Jyoti <jyoti.r.yadav@intel.com>,
	IGT development <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] [CI] tests/pm_backlight.c: Fix brightness failure with system suspend
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:16:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878t2viblb.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bm7ribny.fsf@intel.com>

On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:44 AM Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Quoting Jyoti Yadav (2018-10-17 10:13:20)
>>> > This patch tries to fix the faliure occuring during subtest
>>> > "fade_with_suspend". Failure is occuring because, brightness
>>> > value is being checked before driver initializes fully after resume.
>>> >
>>> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107847
>>> > Signed-off-by: Jyoti Yadav <jyoti.r.yadav@intel.com>
>>> > ---
>>> >  tests/pm_backlight.c | 1 +
>>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>> >
>>> > diff --git a/tests/pm_backlight.c b/tests/pm_backlight.c
>>> > index 32808cd..ec047b3 100644
>>> > --- a/tests/pm_backlight.c
>>> > +++ b/tests/pm_backlight.c
>>> > @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ test_fade_with_suspend(struct context *context, igt_output_t *output)
>>> >         igt_require(igt_wait_for_pm_status(IGT_RUNTIME_PM_STATUS_SUSPENDED));
>>> >
>>> >         igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
>>> > +       igt_require(igt_wait_for_pm_status(IGT_RUNTIME_PM_STATUS_ACTIVE));
>>>
>>> Why would the device be active on system resume if it was asleep
>>> beforehand? In fact, that sounds like the opposite of what we would like
>>> ;)
>>
>> This also looks like papering over a kernel bug I think. Or a test
>> bug. Doing an igt_require after we've done a rather expensive
>> operation already (suspend/resume cycle) is definitely not correct -
>> we should know what should work, not dynamically skip the test if it
>> turns out it didn't work.
>
> It's a test bug.
>
> How about just
>
> diff --git a/tests/pm_backlight.c b/tests/pm_backlight.c
> index 32808cdf6ca4..702ee046d5cb 100644
> --- a/tests/pm_backlight.c
> +++ b/tests/pm_backlight.c
> @@ -177,9 +177,6 @@ test_fade_with_suspend(struct context *context, igt_output_t *output)
>  {
>  	igt_require(igt_setup_runtime_pm());
>  
> -	kmstest_set_connector_dpms(output->display->drm_fd,
> -				   output->config.connector,
> -				   DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
> -  	igt_require(igt_wait_for_pm_status(IGT_RUNTIME_PM_STATUS_SUSPENDED));
>  
>  	igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);

I sneaked in another "-" line there ;)

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-18 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-17  9:13 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] [CI] tests/pm_backlight.c: Fix brightness failure with system suspend Jyoti Yadav
2018-10-17  9:13 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] [CI] HAX: Adding test to fast feedback testlist Jyoti Yadav
2018-10-17  9:42 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2,CI] tests/pm_backlight.c: Fix brightness failure with system suspend Patchwork
2018-10-17  9:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] [CI] " Chris Wilson
2018-10-17 14:19   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-18 14:15     ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-18 14:16       ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2018-10-17 12:03 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2,CI] " Patchwork
2018-10-18 15:09 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2,CI] tests/pm_backlight.c: Fix brightness failure with system suspend (rev2) Patchwork
2018-10-18 20:56 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878t2viblb.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jyoti.r.yadav@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox