From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Yadav Jyoti <jyoti.r.yadav@intel.com>,
IGT development <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] [CI] tests/pm_backlight.c: Fix brightness failure with system suspend
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:15:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bm7ribny.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uFmv421JWowq1udGgjJYrM1NBty2rtVxRp7p_Jb2ZzYrg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:44 AM Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Jyoti Yadav (2018-10-17 10:13:20)
>> > This patch tries to fix the faliure occuring during subtest
>> > "fade_with_suspend". Failure is occuring because, brightness
>> > value is being checked before driver initializes fully after resume.
>> >
>> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107847
>> > Signed-off-by: Jyoti Yadav <jyoti.r.yadav@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> > tests/pm_backlight.c | 1 +
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tests/pm_backlight.c b/tests/pm_backlight.c
>> > index 32808cd..ec047b3 100644
>> > --- a/tests/pm_backlight.c
>> > +++ b/tests/pm_backlight.c
>> > @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ test_fade_with_suspend(struct context *context, igt_output_t *output)
>> > igt_require(igt_wait_for_pm_status(IGT_RUNTIME_PM_STATUS_SUSPENDED));
>> >
>> > igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
>> > + igt_require(igt_wait_for_pm_status(IGT_RUNTIME_PM_STATUS_ACTIVE));
>>
>> Why would the device be active on system resume if it was asleep
>> beforehand? In fact, that sounds like the opposite of what we would like
>> ;)
>
> This also looks like papering over a kernel bug I think. Or a test
> bug. Doing an igt_require after we've done a rather expensive
> operation already (suspend/resume cycle) is definitely not correct -
> we should know what should work, not dynamically skip the test if it
> turns out it didn't work.
It's a test bug.
How about just
diff --git a/tests/pm_backlight.c b/tests/pm_backlight.c
index 32808cdf6ca4..702ee046d5cb 100644
--- a/tests/pm_backlight.c
+++ b/tests/pm_backlight.c
@@ -177,9 +177,6 @@ test_fade_with_suspend(struct context *context, igt_output_t *output)
{
igt_require(igt_setup_runtime_pm());
- kmstest_set_connector_dpms(output->display->drm_fd,
- output->config.connector,
- DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
igt_require(igt_wait_for_pm_status(IGT_RUNTIME_PM_STATUS_SUSPENDED));
igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-17 9:13 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] [CI] tests/pm_backlight.c: Fix brightness failure with system suspend Jyoti Yadav
2018-10-17 9:13 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] [CI] HAX: Adding test to fast feedback testlist Jyoti Yadav
2018-10-17 9:42 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2,CI] tests/pm_backlight.c: Fix brightness failure with system suspend Patchwork
2018-10-17 9:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] [CI] " Chris Wilson
2018-10-17 14:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-18 14:15 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2018-10-18 14:16 ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-17 12:03 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2,CI] " Patchwork
2018-10-18 15:09 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2,CI] tests/pm_backlight.c: Fix brightness failure with system suspend (rev2) Patchwork
2018-10-18 20:56 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bm7ribny.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jyoti.r.yadav@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox