From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>,
Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>,
"igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>,
Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>,
"Garg, Nemesa" <nemesa.garg@intel.com>,
"Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: sync i915_pciids.h with kernel
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:26:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plyfykqo.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7297abc4-309a-4ca8-a606-498b3abd0c2a@intel.com>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023, Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> wrote:
> The reason we need to differentiate GT2/GT3 skus is that they require a
> different programming to get performance metrics.
Please explain why this isn't abstracted in the kernel, and why this
needs PCI ID level identification in userspace.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-05 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 9:08 [PATCH] lib: sync i915_pciids.h with kernel Chaitanya Kumar Borah
2023-12-12 10:24 ` ✗ CI.xeBAT: failure for lib: sync i915_pciids.h with kernel (rev14) Patchwork
2023-12-13 13:17 ` [PATCH] lib: sync i915_pciids.h with kernel Juha-Pekka Heikkila
2023-12-14 4:48 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2023-12-14 14:36 ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-12-18 10:14 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2023-12-18 16:19 ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-12-19 5:43 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2023-12-19 7:00 ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-12-22 12:18 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2024-01-05 13:26 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-01-05 13:35 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2024-01-05 13:47 ` Jani Nikula
2023-12-14 5:03 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for lib: sync i915_pciids.h with kernel (rev15) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-27 20:12 [PATCH] lib: sync i915_pciids.h with kernel Ravi Kumar Vodapalli
2024-03-28 19:32 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87plyfykqo.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=nemesa.garg@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox