Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] i915_guc_pc: Add some basic SLPC igt tests
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:29:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99d669bf-54cc-1105-fe50-616db3aaeae2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZCAmqEsDAxVt7ysy@intel.com>


On 3/26/2023 4:04 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 03:49:59PM -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>> Use the xe_guc_pc test for i915 as well. Validate basic
>> api for GT freq control. Also test interaction with GT
>> reset. We skip rps tests with SLPC enabled, this will
>> re-introduce some coverage. SLPC selftests are already
>> covering some other workload related scenarios.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> you probably meant 'Cc:'
Added you as Signed-off-by since you are the original author in xe igt.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/i915/i915_guc_pc.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   tests/meson.build        |   1 +
>>   2 files changed, 152 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 tests/i915/i915_guc_pc.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_guc_pc.c b/tests/i915/i915_guc_pc.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..f9a0ed83
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_guc_pc.c
> since 'guc_pc' is not a thing in i915 I'm afraid this will cause
> confusion later.
>
> I know, guc_slpc also doesn't make a lot of sense here...
>
> Should we then try to move this code to the 'tests/i915/i915_pm_rps.c'
> or maybe name it i915_pm_freq_api or something like that?

Sure. I was trying to make these guc/slpc specific since host trubo/RPS 
already has coverage in IGT.

Thanks,

Vinay.

>
>> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <dirent.h>
>> +#include <errno.h>
>> +#include <fcntl.h>
>> +#include <inttypes.h>
>> +#include <stdlib.h>
>> +#include <sys/stat.h>
>> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
>> +#include <sys/types.h>
>> +#include <unistd.h>
>> +
>> +#include "drmtest.h"
>> +#include "i915/gem.h"
>> +#include "igt_sysfs.h"
>> +#include "igt.h"
>> +
>> +IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test GuC PM features like SLPC and its interactions");
>> +/*
>> + * Too many intermediate components and steps before freq is adjusted
>> + * Specially if workload is under execution, so let's wait 100 ms.
>> + */
>> +#define ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US 100000
>> +
>> +static uint32_t get_freq(int dirfd, uint8_t id)
>> +{
>> +	uint32_t val;
>> +
>> +	igt_require(igt_sysfs_rps_scanf(dirfd, id, "%u", &val) == 1);
>> +
>> +	return val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int set_freq(int dirfd, uint8_t id, uint32_t val)
>> +{
>> +	return igt_sysfs_rps_printf(dirfd, id, "%u", val);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void test_freq_basic_api(int dirfd, int gt)
>> +{
>> +	uint32_t rpn, rp0, rpe;
>> +
>> +	/* Save frequencies */
>> +	rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
>> +	rp0 = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP0_FREQ_MHZ);
>> +	rpe = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP1_FREQ_MHZ);
>> +	igt_info("System min freq: %dMHz; max freq: %dMHz\n", rpn, rp0);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Negative bound tests
>> +	 * RPn is the floor
>> +	 * RP0 is the ceiling
>> +	 */
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn - 1) < 0);
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rp0 + 1) < 0);
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn - 1) < 0);
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rp0 + 1) < 0);
>> +
>> +	/* Assert min requests are respected from rp0 to rpn */
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rp0) > 0);
>> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rp0);
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpe) > 0);
>> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpe);
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
>> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
>> +
>> +	/* Assert max requests are respected from rpn to rp0 */
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
>> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpe) > 0);
>> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpe);
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rp0) > 0);
>> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rp0);
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
>> +{
>> +	uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
>> +	int fd;
>> +
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
>> +	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
>> +	usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
>> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
>> +
>> +	/* Manually trigger a GT reset */
>> +	fd = igt_debugfs_gt_open(i915, gt, "reset", O_WRONLY);
>> +	igt_require(fd >= 0);
>> +	igt_ignore_warn(write(fd, "1\n", 2));
>> +	close(fd);
>> +
>> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
>> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
>> +}
>> +
>> +igt_main
>> +{
>> +	int i915 = -1;
>> +	uint32_t *stash_min, *stash_max;
>> +
>> +	igt_fixture {
>> +		int num_gts, dirfd, gt;
>> +
>> +		i915 = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>> +		igt_require_gem(i915);
>> +		/* i915_pm_rps already covers execlist path */
>> +		igt_require(gem_using_guc_submission(i915));
>> +
>> +		num_gts = igt_sysfs_get_num_gt(i915);
>> +		stash_min = (uint32_t*)malloc(sizeof(uint32_t) * num_gts);
>> +		stash_max = (uint32_t*)malloc(sizeof(uint32_t) * num_gts);
>> +
>> +		/* Save curr min and max across GTs */
>> +		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt) {
>> +			stash_min[gt] = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ);
>> +			stash_max[gt] = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	igt_describe("Test basic API for controlling min/max GT frequency");
>> +	igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-basic-api") {
>> +		int dirfd, gt;
>> +
>> +		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
>> +			igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
>> +				test_freq_basic_api(dirfd, gt);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after a reset");
>> +	igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-reset") {
>> +		int dirfd, gt;
>> +
>> +		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
>> +			igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
>> +				test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	igt_fixture {
>> +		int dirfd, gt;
>> +		/* Restore frequencies */
>> +		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt) {
>> +			igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, stash_max[gt]) > 0);
>> +			igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, stash_min[gt]) > 0);
>> +		}
>> +		close(i915);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> diff --git a/tests/meson.build b/tests/meson.build
>> index 7d2168be..3ebd3bf2 100644
>> --- a/tests/meson.build
>> +++ b/tests/meson.build
>> @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ i915_progs = [
>>   	'gem_workarounds',
>>   	'i915_fb_tiling',
>>   	'i915_getparams_basic',
>> +	'i915_guc_pc',
>>   	'i915_hangman',
>>   	'i915_hwmon',
>>   	'i915_module_load',
>> -- 
>> 2.38.1
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-27 23:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-24 22:49 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] tests/i915/slpc: Add basic IGT test Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-03-24 22:49 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/debugfs: Add per GT debugfs helpers Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-03-24 22:49 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] i915_guc_pc: Add some basic SLPC igt tests Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-03-26 11:04   ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-03-27 23:29     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay [this message]
2023-03-28 18:53       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-03-30 20:52         ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2023-03-25  0:29 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/i915/slpc: Add basic IGT test Patchwork
2023-03-25  8:21 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99d669bf-54cc-1105-fe50-616db3aaeae2@intel.com \
    --to=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox