From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] i915_guc_pc: Add some basic SLPC igt tests
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 07:04:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCAmqEsDAxVt7ysy@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230324224959.1727662-3-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 03:49:59PM -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Use the xe_guc_pc test for i915 as well. Validate basic
> api for GT freq control. Also test interaction with GT
> reset. We skip rps tests with SLPC enabled, this will
> re-introduce some coverage. SLPC selftests are already
> covering some other workload related scenarios.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
you probably meant 'Cc:'
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/i915_guc_pc.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/meson.build | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 152 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/i915/i915_guc_pc.c
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_guc_pc.c b/tests/i915/i915_guc_pc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..f9a0ed83
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_guc_pc.c
since 'guc_pc' is not a thing in i915 I'm afraid this will cause
confusion later.
I know, guc_slpc also doesn't make a lot of sense here...
Should we then try to move this code to the 'tests/i915/i915_pm_rps.c'
or maybe name it i915_pm_freq_api or something like that?
> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <dirent.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <inttypes.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <sys/stat.h>
> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +
> +#include "drmtest.h"
> +#include "i915/gem.h"
> +#include "igt_sysfs.h"
> +#include "igt.h"
> +
> +IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test GuC PM features like SLPC and its interactions");
> +/*
> + * Too many intermediate components and steps before freq is adjusted
> + * Specially if workload is under execution, so let's wait 100 ms.
> + */
> +#define ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US 100000
> +
> +static uint32_t get_freq(int dirfd, uint8_t id)
> +{
> + uint32_t val;
> +
> + igt_require(igt_sysfs_rps_scanf(dirfd, id, "%u", &val) == 1);
> +
> + return val;
> +}
> +
> +static int set_freq(int dirfd, uint8_t id, uint32_t val)
> +{
> + return igt_sysfs_rps_printf(dirfd, id, "%u", val);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_freq_basic_api(int dirfd, int gt)
> +{
> + uint32_t rpn, rp0, rpe;
> +
> + /* Save frequencies */
> + rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
> + rp0 = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP0_FREQ_MHZ);
> + rpe = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP1_FREQ_MHZ);
> + igt_info("System min freq: %dMHz; max freq: %dMHz\n", rpn, rp0);
> +
> + /*
> + * Negative bound tests
> + * RPn is the floor
> + * RP0 is the ceiling
> + */
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn - 1) < 0);
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rp0 + 1) < 0);
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn - 1) < 0);
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rp0 + 1) < 0);
> +
> + /* Assert min requests are respected from rp0 to rpn */
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rp0) > 0);
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rp0);
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpe) > 0);
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpe);
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> +
> + /* Assert max requests are respected from rpn to rp0 */
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpe) > 0);
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpe);
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rp0) > 0);
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rp0);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
> +{
> + uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
> + int fd;
> +
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
> + usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> +
> + /* Manually trigger a GT reset */
> + fd = igt_debugfs_gt_open(i915, gt, "reset", O_WRONLY);
> + igt_require(fd >= 0);
> + igt_ignore_warn(write(fd, "1\n", 2));
> + close(fd);
> +
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> + igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> +}
> +
> +igt_main
> +{
> + int i915 = -1;
> + uint32_t *stash_min, *stash_max;
> +
> + igt_fixture {
> + int num_gts, dirfd, gt;
> +
> + i915 = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
> + igt_require_gem(i915);
> + /* i915_pm_rps already covers execlist path */
> + igt_require(gem_using_guc_submission(i915));
> +
> + num_gts = igt_sysfs_get_num_gt(i915);
> + stash_min = (uint32_t*)malloc(sizeof(uint32_t) * num_gts);
> + stash_max = (uint32_t*)malloc(sizeof(uint32_t) * num_gts);
> +
> + /* Save curr min and max across GTs */
> + for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt) {
> + stash_min[gt] = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ);
> + stash_max[gt] = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + igt_describe("Test basic API for controlling min/max GT frequency");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-basic-api") {
> + int dirfd, gt;
> +
> + for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
> + igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> + test_freq_basic_api(dirfd, gt);
> + }
> +
> + igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after a reset");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-reset") {
> + int dirfd, gt;
> +
> + for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
> + igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> + test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt);
> + }
> +
> + igt_fixture {
> + int dirfd, gt;
> + /* Restore frequencies */
> + for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt) {
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, stash_max[gt]) > 0);
> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, stash_min[gt]) > 0);
> + }
> + close(i915);
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/tests/meson.build b/tests/meson.build
> index 7d2168be..3ebd3bf2 100644
> --- a/tests/meson.build
> +++ b/tests/meson.build
> @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ i915_progs = [
> 'gem_workarounds',
> 'i915_fb_tiling',
> 'i915_getparams_basic',
> + 'i915_guc_pc',
> 'i915_hangman',
> 'i915_hwmon',
> 'i915_module_load',
> --
> 2.38.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-26 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-24 22:49 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] tests/i915/slpc: Add basic IGT test Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-03-24 22:49 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/debugfs: Add per GT debugfs helpers Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-03-24 22:49 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] i915_guc_pc: Add some basic SLPC igt tests Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-03-26 11:04 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-03-27 23:29 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2023-03-28 18:53 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-03-30 20:52 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2023-03-25 0:29 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/i915/slpc: Add basic IGT test Patchwork
2023-03-25 8:21 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCAmqEsDAxVt7ysy@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox