public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>
To: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
	<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] lib/xe/oa: Add support for 192B_MPEC8LL_NOA16 OAM format
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 10:01:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ff0775d-e568-46db-abb8-efad79ecb387@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260415215257.898995-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>


On 4/16/2026 3:22, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> Support for CRI 192B_MPEC8LL_NOA16 OAM format was previously missed
> out. Add it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> ---
>   lib/xe/oa-configs/oa-metricset-codegen.py | 13 +++++++++++-
>   lib/xe/xe_oa.c                            | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/xe/oa-configs/oa-metricset-codegen.py b/lib/xe/oa-configs/oa-metricset-codegen.py
> index c5c7a2c8d4..b44d4d73af 100644
> --- a/lib/xe/oa-configs/oa-metricset-codegen.py
> +++ b/lib/xe/oa-configs/oa-metricset-codegen.py
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ def generate_metric_sets(args, gen):
>                       metric_set->perfcnt_offset = metric_set->c_offset + 8;
>                   """))
>           elif gen.chipset == "lnl" or gen.chipset == "bmg" or gen.chipset == "ptl" or gen.chipset == "cri":
> -            # See intel_xe_perf_accumulate_reports for the offsets
> +            # See intel_xe_perf_accumulate_reports for the offsets (value of idx variable)
>               if set.oa_format == "128B_MPEC8_NOA16" or set.oa_format == "128B_MERT_PEC8":
>                   c(textwrap.dedent("""\
>                       metric_set->perf_oa_format = XE_OAM_FORMAT_MPEC8u32_B8_C8;
> @@ -151,6 +151,17 @@ def generate_metric_sets(args, gen):
>                       metric_set->b_offset = metric_set->pec_offset + 8;
>                       metric_set->c_offset = metric_set->b_offset + 8;
>                   """))
> +            elif set.oa_format == "192B_MPEC8LL_NOA16":
> +                c(textwrap.dedent("""\
> +                    metric_set->perf_oa_format = XE_OAM_FORMAT_MPEC8u64_B8_C8;
> +
> +                    metric_set->perf_raw_size = 192;
> +                    metric_set->gpu_time_offset = 0;
> +                    metric_set->gpu_clock_offset = 1;
> +                    metric_set->pec_offset = 2;
> +                    metric_set->b_offset = metric_set->pec_offset + 8;
> +                    metric_set->c_offset = metric_set->b_offset + 8;
> +                """))
>               else:
>                   c(textwrap.dedent("""\
>                       metric_set->perf_oa_format = XE_OA_FORMAT_PEC64u64;
> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_oa.c b/lib/xe/xe_oa.c
> index b2f447c944..d1a382bdd1 100644
> --- a/lib/xe/xe_oa.c
> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_oa.c
> @@ -875,6 +875,30 @@ void intel_xe_perf_accumulate_reports(struct intel_xe_perf_accumulator *acc,
>   
>   		break;
>   
> +	case XE_OAM_FORMAT_MPEC8u64_B8_C8:
> +		/* 64 bit timestamp */
> +		if (perf->devinfo.oa_timestamp_shift >= 0)
> +			deltas[idx++] += (end64[1] - start64[1]) << perf->devinfo.oa_timestamp_shift;
> +		else
> +			deltas[idx++] += (end64[1] - start64[1]) >> (-perf->devinfo.oa_timestamp_shift);
> +
> +		/* 64 bit clock */
> +		deltas[idx++] += end64[3] - start64[3];
> +
> +		/* 8x 64bit MPEC counters */
> +		for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
> +			deltas[idx++] += end64[4 + i] - start64[4 + i];
> +
> +		
I feel the below increments are wrong. The added format is of 64bit.
> /* 8x 32bit B counters */
> +		for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
> +			accumulate_uint32(start + 16 + i, end + 16 + i, deltas + idx++);
This should be "accumulate_uint32(start + 24 + i, end + 24 + i, deltas + 
idx++);"
> +
> +		/* 8x 32bit C counters */
> +		for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
> +			accumulate_uint32(start + 24 + i, end + 24 + i, deltas + idx++);

And this, "accumulate_uint32(start + 32 + i, end + 32 + i, deltas + idx++);"

I'm still new to this, so I can be wrong. Maybe help me understand. 
Other than this, patch looks fine to me.

-shekhar

> +
> +		break;
> +
>   	case XE_OA_FORMAT_PEC64u64:
>   		/* 64 bit timestamp */
>   		if (perf->devinfo.oa_timestamp_shift >= 0)

-- 
Shekhar Chauhan
Linux Graphics Software Engineer
Intel Corporation


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-16  4:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-15 21:52 [PATCH i-g-t] lib/xe/oa: Add support for 192B_MPEC8LL_NOA16 OAM format Ashutosh Dixit
2026-04-16  1:27 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-04-16  1:58 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-16  3:51 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-16  4:31 ` Shekhar Chauhan [this message]
2026-04-16 18:50   ` [PATCH i-g-t] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2026-04-16 11:39 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-17  3:33 [PATCH i-g-t] " Ashutosh Dixit
2026-04-17  5:35 ` Shekhar Chauhan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ff0775d-e568-46db-abb8-efad79ecb387@intel.com \
    --to=shekhar.chauhan@intel.com \
    --cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox