Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 10/16] Verify execbuf fails with stale PXP context after teardown
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:53:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YTupsRZ/pezHuJnQ@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210902173043.821318-11-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>

On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 10:30:37AM -0700, Alan Previn wrote:
> Add a subtest to verify that reusing a stale protected context
> in a gem_execbuff after a teardown fails with -EIO error because
> it's banned. Trigger the teardown via the pxp invalidation
> debugfs that simulates a HW teardown IRQ.
> 
> NOTE: The end-to-end architecture requirement includes that
> any break in the links of the PXP sessions needs to trigger a
> full teardown and the application needs to be made aware of that
> allowing it to re-establish the end-to-end pipeline of buffers,
> contexts and renders again if it chooses to. This stricter
> behavior targets only contexts created with PXP enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/intel_batchbuffer.c |   2 +-
>  lib/intel_batchbuffer.h |   3 +
>  tests/i915/gem_pxp.c    | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c b/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c
> index 773d0d27..3aebcc16 100644
> --- a/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c
> +++ b/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c
> @@ -2529,7 +2529,7 @@ static void update_offsets(struct intel_bb *ibb,
>   * Note: In this step execobj for bb is allocated and inserted to the objects
>   * array.
>  */
> -static int __intel_bb_exec(struct intel_bb *ibb, uint32_t end_offset,
> +int __intel_bb_exec(struct intel_bb *ibb, uint32_t end_offset,
>  			   uint64_t flags, bool sync)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
> diff --git a/lib/intel_batchbuffer.h b/lib/intel_batchbuffer.h
> index 10fa66ee..58bddb1a 100644
> --- a/lib/intel_batchbuffer.h
> +++ b/lib/intel_batchbuffer.h
> @@ -668,6 +668,9 @@ uint64_t intel_bb_offset_reloc_to_object(struct intel_bb *ibb,
>  					 uint32_t offset,
>  					 uint64_t presumed_offset);
>  
> +int __intel_bb_exec(struct intel_bb *ibb, uint32_t end_offset,
> +			uint64_t flags, bool sync);
> +
>  void intel_bb_dump_cache(struct intel_bb *ibb);
>  
>  void intel_bb_exec(struct intel_bb *ibb, uint32_t end_offset,
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c b/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c
> index b997b058..6884e0d7 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_pxp.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  
>  #include "igt.h"
>  #include "i915/gem.h"
> +#include <fcntl.h>
>  
>  IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test PXP that manages protected content through arbitrated HW-PXP-session");
>  /* Note: PXP = "Protected Xe Path" */
> @@ -15,6 +16,14 @@ struct powermgt_data {
>  	bool has_runtime_pm;
>  };
>  
> +struct simple_exec_assets {
> +	uint32_t ctx;
> +	uint32_t fencebo;
> +	struct intel_buf *fencebuf;
> +	struct buf_ops *bops;
> +	struct intel_bb *ibb;
> +};
> +
>  static int create_bo_ext(int i915, uint32_t size, bool protected_is_true, uint32_t *bo_out)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -645,6 +654,146 @@ static void test_pxp_pwrcycle_teardown_keychange(int i915, struct powermgt_data
>  	igt_assert_eq(matched_after_keychange, 0);
>  }
>  
> +#define GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL    ((3 << 29) | (3 << 27) | (2 << 24))
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL	            (1 << 20)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_FLUSH    (1 << 12)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE           (1 << 7)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_DATA_CACHE_INVALIDATE  (1 << 5)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_PROTECTEDPATH_DISABLE  (1 << 27)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_PROTECTEDPATH_ENABLE   (1 << 22)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_POST_SYNC_OP           (1 << 14)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_POST_SYNC_OP_STORE_DW_IDX (1 << 21)
> +#define PS_OP_TAG_BEFORE                    0x1234fed0
> +#define PS_OP_TAG_AFTER                     0x5678cbaf
> +
> +static void emit_pipectrl(struct intel_bb *ibb, struct intel_buf *fenceb, bool before)
> +{
> +	uint32_t pipe_ctl_flags = 0;
> +	uint32_t ps_op_id;
> +
> +	intel_bb_out(ibb, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL);
> +	intel_bb_out(ibb, pipe_ctl_flags);
> +
> +	if (before)
> +		ps_op_id = PS_OP_TAG_BEFORE;
> +	else
> +		ps_op_id = PS_OP_TAG_AFTER;
> +
> +	pipe_ctl_flags = (PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE |
> +			  PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL |
> +			  PIPE_CONTROL_POST_SYNC_OP);
> +	intel_bb_out(ibb, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL | 4);
> +	intel_bb_out(ibb, pipe_ctl_flags);
> +	intel_bb_emit_reloc(ibb, fenceb->handle, 0, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_COMMAND, (before?0:8),
> +			    fenceb->addr.offset);
> +	intel_bb_out(ibb, ps_op_id);
> +	intel_bb_out(ibb, ps_op_id);
> +	intel_bb_out(ibb, MI_NOOP);
> +	intel_bb_out(ibb, MI_NOOP);
> +}
> +
> +static void assert_pipectl_storedw_done(int i915, uint32_t bo)
> +{
> +	uint32_t *ptr;
> +	uint32_t success_mask = 0x0;
> +
> +	ptr = gem_mmap__device_coherent(i915, bo, 0, 4096, PROT_READ);
> +
> +	if (ptr[0] == PS_OP_TAG_BEFORE && ptr[1] == PS_OP_TAG_BEFORE)
> +		success_mask |= 0x1;
> +
> +	igt_assert_eq(success_mask, 0x1);
> +	igt_assert(gem_munmap(ptr, 4096) == 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(int i915, struct intel_bb *ibb, uint32_t ctx,
> +				      struct intel_buf *fence)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	intel_bb_ptr_set(ibb, 0);
> +	intel_bb_add_intel_buf(ibb, fence, true);
> +	emit_pipectrl(ibb, fence, true);
> +	intel_bb_emit_bbe(ibb);
> +	ret = __intel_bb_exec(ibb, intel_bb_offset(ibb),
> +				  I915_EXEC_RENDER | I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC, false);
> +	if (ret == 0) {
> +		gem_sync(ibb->i915, fence->handle);
> +		assert_pipectl_storedw_done(i915, fence->handle);
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void prepare_exec_assets(int i915, struct simple_exec_assets *data, bool ctx_pxp,
> +				bool buf_pxp)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (ctx_pxp)
> +		ret = create_ctx_with_params(i915, true, true, true, false, &(data->ctx));
> +	else
> +		ret = create_ctx_with_params(i915, false, false, false, false, &(data->ctx));
> +	igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> +	igt_assert_eq(get_ctx_protected_param(i915, data->ctx), ctx_pxp);
> +	data->ibb = intel_bb_create_with_context(i915, data->ctx, 4096);
> +	igt_assert(data->ibb);
> +
> +	data->fencebo = alloc_and_fill_dest_buff(i915, buf_pxp, 4096, 0);
> +
> +	data->bops = buf_ops_create(i915);
> +	igt_assert(data->bops);
> +
> +	data->fencebuf = intel_buf_create_using_handle(data->bops, data->fencebo, 256, 4,
> +						       32, 0, I915_TILING_NONE, 0);
> +	intel_bb_add_intel_buf(data->ibb, data->fencebuf, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void free_exec_assets(int i915, struct simple_exec_assets *data)
> +{
> +	intel_bb_destroy(data->ibb);
> +	gem_close(i915, data->fencebo);
> +	intel_buf_destroy(data->fencebuf);
> +	gem_context_destroy(i915, data->ctx);
> +	buf_ops_destroy(data->bops);
> +}
> +
> +static void trigger_pxp_debugfs_forced_teardown(int i915)
> +{
> +	int fd, ret;
> +	char str[32];
> +
> +	fd = igt_debugfs_open(i915, "gt/pxp/invalidate", O_RDWR);
> +	igt_assert_f(fd >= 0, "Can't open pxp invalidation debugfs\n");
> +	ret = snprintf(str, sizeof(str), "0x1");
> +	igt_assert(ret > 2 && ret < sizeof(str));
> +	ret = write(fd, str, ret);
> +	igt_assert_f(ret > 0, "Can't write pxp invalidation debugfs\n");
> +
> +	close(fd);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_pxp_stale_ctx_execution(int i915)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct simple_exec_assets data = {0};
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Use normal buffers for testing for invalidation
> +	 * of protected contexts to ensure kernel is catching
> +	 * the invalidated context (not buffer)
> +	 */
> +	prepare_exec_assets(i915, &data, true, false);
> +	ret = gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, data.ibb, data.ctx, data.fencebuf);
> +	igt_assert(ret == 0);
> +
> +	trigger_pxp_debugfs_forced_teardown(i915);
> +
> +	ret = gem_execbuf_flush_store_dw(i915, data.ibb, data.ctx, data.fencebuf);
> +	igt_assert_f((ret == -EIO), "Executing stale pxp context didn't fail with -EIO\n");

I believe you meant the opposite right?
other then that, the patch looks good to me...

> +
> +	free_exec_assets(i915, &data);
> +}
> +
>  igt_main
>  {
>  	int i915 = -1;
> @@ -734,6 +883,8 @@ igt_main
>  		igt_describe("Verify suspend-resume teardown management:");
>  		igt_subtest("verify-pxp-key-change-after-suspend-resume")
>  			test_pxp_pwrcycle_teardown_keychange(i915, &pm);
> +		igt_subtest("verify-pxp-stale-ctx-execution")
> +			test_pxp_stale_ctx_execution(i915);
>  	}
>  
>  	igt_fixture {
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-10 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-02 17:30 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 00/16] Introduce PXP Test Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 01/16] Add PXP UAPI support in i915_drm.h Alan Previn
2021-09-03 10:31   ` Petri Latvala
2021-09-03 21:11     ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2021-09-06  6:21       ` Petri Latvala
2021-09-06 21:23         ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 02/16] Add basic PXP testing of buffer and context alloc Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 03/16] Perform a regular 3d copy as a control checkpoint Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 04/16] Add PXP attribute support in batchbuffer and buffer_ops libs Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 05/16] Add MI_SET_APPID instruction definition Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 06/16] Enable protected session cmd in gen12_render_copyfunc Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 07/16] Add subtest to copy raw source to protected dest Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 08/16] Add test where both src and dest are protected Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 09/16] Verify PXP teardown occurred through suspend-resume Alan Previn
2021-09-03 16:47   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-09-03 21:00     ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 10/16] Verify execbuf fails with stale PXP context after teardown Alan Previn
2021-09-10 18:53   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2021-09-10 19:04     ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2021-09-10 19:12       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-09-10 21:23         ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 11/16] Verify execbuf fails with stale PXP buffer " Alan Previn
2021-09-10 19:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-09-10 19:11     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 12/16] Verify execbuf ok with stale PXP buf in opt-out use Alan Previn
2021-09-10 19:12   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 13/16] Verify execution behavior with stale PXP assets through suspend-resume Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 14/16] Ensure RESET_STATS reports invalidated protected contexts Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 15/16] Verify protected surfaces are dma buffer sharable Alan Previn
2021-09-02 17:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v9 16/16] tests/i915_pxp: CRC validation for display tests Alan Previn
2021-09-02 18:19 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Introduce PXP Test (rev9) Patchwork
2021-09-02 22:32 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YTupsRZ/pezHuJnQ@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox