From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode: Fix non-blocking subtest
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 03:50:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaSrePffu4Zthdla@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240115031942.29658-1-sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 08:49:42AM +0530, sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com wrote:
> From: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
>
> Fix submission of exec, Call exec ioctl sperately instead existing
> igt wrapper _xe_exec which leads to infinite loop even kernel throws an
> error.
>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode.c
> index 6ebfa1a86..473b11ae9 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include "igt.h"
> #include "lib/igt_syncobj.h"
> #include "lib/intel_reg.h"
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> #include "xe_drm.h"
>
> #include "xe/xe_ioctl.h"
> @@ -320,7 +321,7 @@ static void non_block(int fd, int expect)
> uint32_t data;
> uint64_t exec_sync;
> } *data = NULL;
> - struct xe_spin_opts spin_opts = { .addr = addr, .preempt = false };
> + struct xe_spin_opts spin_opts = { .preempt = false };
> struct drm_xe_engine *engine;
> uint64_t batch_offset = (char *)&data[EXEC_DATA].batch - (char *)data;
> uint64_t batch_addr = addr + batch_offset;
> @@ -350,6 +351,7 @@ static void non_block(int fd, int expect)
> xe_wait_ufence(fd, &data[VM_DATA].vm_sync, USER_FENCE_VALUE, 0, ONE_SEC);
> data[VM_DATA].vm_sync = 0;
>
> + spin_opts.addr = addr + (char *)&data[SPIN_DATA].spin - (char *)data;
> xe_spin_init(&data[SPIN_DATA].spin, &spin_opts);
> sync[0].addr = addr + (char *)&data[SPIN_DATA].exec_sync - (char *)data;
> exec.exec_queue_id = exec_queue;
> @@ -358,11 +360,11 @@ static void non_block(int fd, int expect)
> xe_spin_wait_started(&data[SPIN_DATA].spin);
>
> b = 0;
> - data[0].batch[b++] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
> - data[0].batch[b++] = sdi_addr;
> - data[0].batch[b++] = sdi_addr >> 32;
> - data[0].batch[b++] = value;
> - data[0].batch[b++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> + data[EXEC_DATA].batch[b++] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
> + data[EXEC_DATA].batch[b++] = sdi_addr;
> + data[EXEC_DATA].batch[b++] = sdi_addr >> 32;
> + data[EXEC_DATA].batch[b++] = value;
> + data[EXEC_DATA].batch[b++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> igt_assert(b <= ARRAY_SIZE(data->batch));
>
> sync[0].addr = addr + (char *)&data[EXEC_DATA].exec_sync - (char *)data;
> @@ -371,12 +373,15 @@ static void non_block(int fd, int expect)
> exec.address = batch_addr;
>
> while (1) {
> - err = __xe_exec(fd, &exec);
>
> - if (err == -EWOULDBLOCK)
> + err = ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC, &exec);
> +
> + if (err == -1 && errno == EWOULDBLOCK)
> break;
> +
> + igt_assert_eq(err, 0);
> }
> - igt_assert_eq(err, expect);
> + igt_assert_eq(errno, expect);
>
> xe_spin_end(&data[SPIN_DATA].spin);
> xe_wait_ufence(fd, &data[SPIN_DATA].exec_sync, USER_FENCE_VALUE, 0, ONE_SEC);
> @@ -454,7 +459,7 @@ igt_main
> }
>
> igt_subtest("non-blocking")
> - non_block(fd, -EWOULDBLOCK);
> + non_block(fd, EWOULDBLOCK);
>
>
> igt_fixture
> --
> 2.39.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode: Fix non-blocking subtest
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 03:50:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaSrePffu4Zthdla@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20240115035016.Kx4NNC84TWCG6tp4p-sJlWSfWOAK1B-hhohBzfPJIeM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240115031942.29658-1-sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 08:49:42AM +0530, sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com wrote:
> From: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
>
> Fix submission of exec, Call exec ioctl sperately instead existing
> igt wrapper _xe_exec which leads to infinite loop even kernel throws an
> error.
>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode.c
> index 6ebfa1a86..473b11ae9 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include "igt.h"
> #include "lib/igt_syncobj.h"
> #include "lib/intel_reg.h"
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> #include "xe_drm.h"
>
> #include "xe/xe_ioctl.h"
> @@ -320,7 +321,7 @@ static void non_block(int fd, int expect)
> uint32_t data;
> uint64_t exec_sync;
> } *data = NULL;
> - struct xe_spin_opts spin_opts = { .addr = addr, .preempt = false };
> + struct xe_spin_opts spin_opts = { .preempt = false };
> struct drm_xe_engine *engine;
> uint64_t batch_offset = (char *)&data[EXEC_DATA].batch - (char *)data;
> uint64_t batch_addr = addr + batch_offset;
> @@ -350,6 +351,7 @@ static void non_block(int fd, int expect)
> xe_wait_ufence(fd, &data[VM_DATA].vm_sync, USER_FENCE_VALUE, 0, ONE_SEC);
> data[VM_DATA].vm_sync = 0;
>
> + spin_opts.addr = addr + (char *)&data[SPIN_DATA].spin - (char *)data;
> xe_spin_init(&data[SPIN_DATA].spin, &spin_opts);
> sync[0].addr = addr + (char *)&data[SPIN_DATA].exec_sync - (char *)data;
> exec.exec_queue_id = exec_queue;
> @@ -358,11 +360,11 @@ static void non_block(int fd, int expect)
> xe_spin_wait_started(&data[SPIN_DATA].spin);
>
> b = 0;
> - data[0].batch[b++] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
> - data[0].batch[b++] = sdi_addr;
> - data[0].batch[b++] = sdi_addr >> 32;
> - data[0].batch[b++] = value;
> - data[0].batch[b++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> + data[EXEC_DATA].batch[b++] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
> + data[EXEC_DATA].batch[b++] = sdi_addr;
> + data[EXEC_DATA].batch[b++] = sdi_addr >> 32;
> + data[EXEC_DATA].batch[b++] = value;
> + data[EXEC_DATA].batch[b++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> igt_assert(b <= ARRAY_SIZE(data->batch));
>
> sync[0].addr = addr + (char *)&data[EXEC_DATA].exec_sync - (char *)data;
> @@ -371,12 +373,15 @@ static void non_block(int fd, int expect)
> exec.address = batch_addr;
>
> while (1) {
> - err = __xe_exec(fd, &exec);
>
> - if (err == -EWOULDBLOCK)
> + err = ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC, &exec);
> +
> + if (err == -1 && errno == EWOULDBLOCK)
> break;
> +
> + igt_assert_eq(err, 0);
> }
> - igt_assert_eq(err, expect);
> + igt_assert_eq(errno, expect);
>
> xe_spin_end(&data[SPIN_DATA].spin);
> xe_wait_ufence(fd, &data[SPIN_DATA].exec_sync, USER_FENCE_VALUE, 0, ONE_SEC);
> @@ -454,7 +459,7 @@ igt_main
> }
>
> igt_subtest("non-blocking")
> - non_block(fd, -EWOULDBLOCK);
> + non_block(fd, EWOULDBLOCK);
>
>
> igt_fixture
> --
> 2.39.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-15 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-15 3:19 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/xe_exec_compute_mode: Fix non-blocking subtest sai.gowtham.ch
2024-01-15 3:50 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-01-15 3:50 ` Matthew Brost
2024-01-15 3:52 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-01-15 4:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-01-15 13:43 ` Kamil Konieczny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZaSrePffu4Zthdla@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox