From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/intel/xe_pm: Validate vm-bind prefetch flag with suspend and resume
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:29:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh3UlC5aunACNHKm@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240415084035.2603-3-sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 02:10:34PM +0530, sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com wrote:
> From: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
>
> Test functionality of vm_bind prefetch with S&R.
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_pm.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pm.c b/tests/intel/xe_pm.c
> index fafd7a52e..8857265a9 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_pm.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #define MAGIC_2 0xdeadbeef
>
> #define USERPTR (0x1 << 0)
> +#define PREFETCH (0x1 << 2)
what happen to the bit 1?
>
> typedef struct {
> int fd_xe;
> @@ -289,6 +290,7 @@ static void close_fw_handle(int sig)
> * arg[2]:
> *
> * @usrptr: usrptr
> + * @prefetch: prefetch
> */
> static void
> test_exec(device_t device, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> @@ -341,9 +343,15 @@ test_exec(device_t device, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> data = aligned_alloc(xe_get_default_alignment(device.fd_xe), bo_size);
> memset(data, 0, bo_size);
> } else {
> - bo = xe_bo_create(device.fd_xe, vm, bo_size,
> - vram_if_possible(device.fd_xe, eci->gt_id),
> - DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
> + if (flags & PREFETCH)
> + bo = xe_bo_create(device.fd_xe, 0, bo_size,
> + all_memory_regions(device.fd_xe) |
> + vram_if_possible(device.fd_xe, 0),
> + DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
> + else
> + bo = xe_bo_create(device.fd_xe, vm, bo_size,
> + vram_if_possible(device.fd_xe, eci->gt_id),
> + DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
> data = xe_bo_map(device.fd_xe, bo, bo_size);
> }
>
> @@ -362,6 +370,10 @@ test_exec(device_t device, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> xe_vm_bind_userptr_async(device.fd_xe, vm, bind_exec_queues[0],
> to_user_pointer(data), addr, bo_size, sync, 1);
>
> + if (flags & PREFETCH)
> + xe_vm_prefetch_async(device.fd_xe, vm, bind_exec_queues[0], 0, addr,
> + bo_size, sync, 1, 0);
anything else missing here?
apparently the patch still failed badly and I lost my machine now...
will check again tomorrow with some debugs.
> +
> if (check_rpm && runtime_usage_available(device.pci_xe))
> igt_assert(igt_pm_get_runtime_usage(device.pci_xe) > rpm_usage);
>
> @@ -617,6 +629,7 @@ igt_main
> unsigned int flags;
> } vm_op[] = {
> { "usrptr", USERPTR },
> + { "prefetch", PREFETCH },
> { NULL },
> };
>
> --
> 2.39.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-15 8:40 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] tests/intel/xe_pm: Tests to validate vm-bind with S&R sai.gowtham.ch
2024-04-15 8:40 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/intel/xe_pm: Test validates vm-bind userptr flag with suspend and resume sai.gowtham.ch
2024-04-16 1:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-15 8:40 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/intel/xe_pm: Validate vm-bind prefetch " sai.gowtham.ch
2024-04-16 1:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-04-16 20:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-15 8:40 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/intel/xe_pm: Tests vm-unbind all flag functionality with S&R sai.gowtham.ch
2024-04-16 20:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-16 6:37 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for tests/intel/xe_pm: Tests to validate vm-bind with S&R (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-16 6:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-19 14:20 ` Kamil Konieczny
2024-04-17 1:24 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-01 18:46 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] tests/intel/xe_pm: Tests to validate vm-bind with S&R sai.gowtham.ch
2024-04-01 18:46 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/intel/xe_pm: Validate vm-bind prefetch flag with suspend and resume sai.gowtham.ch
2024-04-03 20:27 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-25 20:10 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] tests/intel/xe_pm: Tests to validate vm-bind sai.gowtham.ch
2024-03-25 20:10 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/intel/xe_pm: Validate vm-bind prefetch flag with suspend and resume sai.gowtham.ch
2024-03-28 18:05 ` Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zh3UlC5aunACNHKm@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox