From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Vishwanathapura,
Niranjana" <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: "Ch, Sai Gowtham" <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>,
"Dandamudi, Priyanka" <priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>,
"kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com"
<kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Validate queue priority setting
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 20:45:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be58876f8e297c0aa41705828f3605f8ed17f00a.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251121035715.767226-26-niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
On Thu, 2025-11-20 at 19:57 -0800, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
> Validate setting priority of queues within the multi queue
> group.
>
> v2: Add and use XE_EXEC_QUEUE_NUM_PRIORITIES (priyanka)
>
> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura
> <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue.c | 67
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue.c
> b/tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue.c
> index 977b4e7a0..3bbcf7975 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue.c
> @@ -18,9 +18,15 @@
> #include "xe/xe_ioctl.h"
> #include "xe/xe_query.h"
>
> +#define XE_EXEC_QUEUE_PRIORITY_LOW 0
> +#define XE_EXEC_QUEUE_PRIORITY_NORMAL 1
> +#define XE_EXEC_QUEUE_PRIORITY_HIGH 2
> +#define XE_EXEC_QUEUE_NUM_PRIORITIES 3
> +
> #define MAX_N_EXEC_QUEUES 64
>
> #define USERPTR (0x1 << 0)
> +#define PRIORITY (0x1 << 1)
>
> #define MAX_INSTANCE 9
>
> @@ -37,6 +43,15 @@ __test_sanity(int fd, int gt, int class)
> .property =
> DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_MULTI_GROUP,
> .value = DRM_XE_MULTI_GROUP_CREATE,
> };
> + struct drm_xe_ext_set_property mq_priority = {
> + .base.name =
> DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_EXTENSION_SET_PROPERTY,
> + .property =
> DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_MULTI_QUEUE_PRIORITY,
> + };
> + struct drm_xe_ext_set_property priority = {
> + .base.name =
> DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_EXTENSION_SET_PROPERTY,
> + .property = DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_PRIORITY,
> + .value = XE_EXEC_QUEUE_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
> + };
> uint64_t invalid_flag = 0, ext =
> to_user_pointer(&multi_queue);
> struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance eci[MAX_INSTANCE];
> struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
> @@ -77,6 +92,11 @@ __test_sanity(int fd, int gt, int class)
> multi_queue.base.next_extension =
> to_user_pointer(&multi_queue);
> igt_assert_eq(__xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, 1, 1, eci, ext,
> &val), -EINVAL);
>
> + /* Setting other queue properties are valid for Q0 */
> + multi_queue.base.next_extension = to_user_pointer(&priority);
> + exec_queues[0] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, ext);
> + xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd, exec_queues[0]);
> +
> /* Adding queues to group after primary is destroyed is
> invalid */
> multi_queue.base.next_extension = 0;
> exec_queues[0] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, ext);
> @@ -105,6 +125,11 @@ __test_sanity(int fd, int gt, int class)
> if (n > 1)
> igt_assert_eq(__xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, 1, n,
> eci, ext, &val), -EINVAL);
>
> + /* Setting properties (other than MULTI_QUEUE_PRIORITY) is
> invalid for secondary queues */
> + multi_queue.base.next_extension = to_user_pointer(&priority);
> + igt_assert_eq(__xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, 1, 1, eci, ext,
> &val), -EINVAL);
> +
> + multi_queue.base.next_extension = 0;
> for (i = 1; i < MAX_N_EXEC_QUEUES; i++)
> exec_queues[i] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci,
> ext);
>
> @@ -135,6 +160,37 @@ __test_sanity(int fd, int gt, int class)
> xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd, exec_queues[i]);
> }
>
> + /* MQ priority is not valid for regular queues */
> + igt_assert_eq(__xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, 1, 1, eci,
> +
> to_user_pointer(&mq_priority), &val), -EINVAL);
> +
> + /* MQ priority validation */
> + multi_queue.value = DRM_XE_MULTI_GROUP_CREATE;
> + multi_queue.base.next_extension =
> to_user_pointer(&mq_priority);
> + mq_priority.value = XE_EXEC_QUEUE_NUM_PRIORITIES;
> + igt_assert_eq(__xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, 1, 1, eci, ext,
> &val), -EINVAL);
> +
> + mq_priority.value = XE_EXEC_QUEUE_PRIORITY_HIGH;
> + exec_queues[0] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, ext);
> + multi_queue.value = exec_queues[0];
> + exec_queues[1] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, ext);
> + xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd, exec_queues[1]);
> + xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd, exec_queues[0]);
> +
> + igt_fork(child, 1) {
> + igt_drop_root();
> +
> + /* Tests MULTI_QUEUE_PRIORITY property by dropping
> root permissions */
> + multi_queue.value = DRM_XE_MULTI_GROUP_CREATE;
> + mq_priority.value = XE_EXEC_QUEUE_PRIORITY_HIGH;
> + exec_queues[0] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci,
> ext);
> + multi_queue.value = exec_queues[0];
> + exec_queues[1] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci,
> ext);
> + xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd, exec_queues[1]);
> + xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd, exec_queues[0]);
> + }
> + igt_waitchildren();
> +
> xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
> }
>
> @@ -197,8 +253,17 @@ test_legacy_mode(int fd, struct
> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci, int num_place
> .base.name =
> DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_EXTENSION_SET_PROPERTY,
> .property =
> DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_MULTI_GROUP,
> };
> + struct drm_xe_ext_set_property mq_priority = {
> + .base.name =
> DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_EXTENSION_SET_PROPERTY,
> + .property =
> DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_MULTI_QUEUE_PRIORITY,
> + };
> uint64_t ext = to_user_pointer(&multi_queue);
>
> + if (flags & PRIORITY) {
> + multi_queue.base.next_extension =
> to_user_pointer(&mq_priority);
> + mq_priority.value =
> XE_EXEC_QUEUE_PRIORITY_NORMAL + (rand() % 2);
> + }
> +
> multi_queue.value = i ? exec_queues[0] :
> DRM_XE_MULTI_GROUP_CREATE;
> igt_assert_eq(__xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, 1,
> num_placement, eci,
> ext,
> &exec_queues[i]), 0);
> @@ -299,6 +364,7 @@ test_legacy_mode(int fd, struct
> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci, int num_place
> *
> * @basic: basic
> * @userptr: userptr
> + * @priority: priority
> */
> static void
> test_exec(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci, int
> num_placement,
> @@ -316,6 +382,7 @@ igt_main
> } sections[] = {
> { "basic", 0 },
> { "userptr", USERPTR },
> + { "priority", PRIORITY },
> { NULL },
> };
> int fd, gt, class;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-04 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-21 3:57 [PATCH v2 00/19] Multi Queue feature validation support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] drm-uapi/xe: Sync with Multi-Queue uapi Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-04 19:19 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-04 20:58 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-05 18:07 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] lib/xe: Add multi-queue helper routines Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-04 19:20 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Add xe_exec_multi_queue test Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-04 20:02 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-05 1:34 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-05 18:09 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Validate exec submissions Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-02 5:27 ` Ch, Sai Gowtham
2025-12-04 20:42 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Validate queue priority setting Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-02 5:29 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-04 20:45 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Add close-fd tests Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-24 8:18 ` Goyal, Nakshtra
2025-12-04 20:46 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Add multiple placement test Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-02 5:32 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-05 18:10 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Add preempt mode test Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-04 20:52 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-05 19:12 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-08 19:40 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] lib/xe: Add exec_queue set_property ioctl support Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-04 19:24 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-05 1:58 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-05 18:11 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Add dynamic priority test Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-04 20:53 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Add userptr invalidation tests Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-04 20:56 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Add fault mode test Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-21 5:04 ` Goyal, Nakshtra
2025-12-04 20:59 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-04 23:25 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-05 18:13 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Add multi queues with SMEM Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-04 19:56 ` Goyal, Nakshtra
2025-12-04 20:59 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] lib/xe/xe_spin: Add switch point for preemptible spinner Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-04 21:03 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-04 21:42 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-05 18:45 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Add priority test Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-02 5:28 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-04 21:53 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-05 18:23 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-08 19:38 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Add submission sanity test Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-02 11:46 ` Ch, Sai Gowtham
2025-12-04 21:08 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-04 21:28 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Sanity test KEEP_ACTIVE flag Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-04 21:10 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-04 21:20 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_multi_queue: Keep group active in exec-sanity Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-02 11:51 ` Ch, Sai Gowtham
2025-12-04 21:12 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] tests/intel/xe_exec_queue_property: Update invalid-property test Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-04 19:25 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-12-04 21:11 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-11-21 4:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Multi Queue feature validation support (rev2) Patchwork
2025-11-21 6:47 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-21 7:20 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-21 9:42 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be58876f8e297c0aa41705828f3605f8ed17f00a.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
--cc=priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com \
--cc=sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox