From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 07/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: cleanups
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:08:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c65e1e57-3000-bf42-09b3-5939acd6ad38@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230926084451.1732748-8-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
On 26/09/2023 09:44, Marcin Bernatowicz wrote:
> Cleaning checkpatch.pl reported warnings/errors.
> Removed unused fence_signal field from struct w_step.
> calloc vs malloc in parse_workload for struct workload.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> benchmarks/gem_wsim.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> index 3b01340bf..daa20fb8a 100644
> --- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> +++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> /*
> * Copyright © 2017 Intel Corporation
> *
> @@ -76,8 +77,7 @@ struct duration {
> bool unbound_duration;
> };
>
> -enum w_type
> -{
> +enum w_type {
> BATCH,
> SYNC,
> DELAY,
> @@ -102,8 +102,7 @@ struct dep_entry {
> int working_set; /* -1 = step dependecy, >= 0 working set id */
> };
>
> -struct deps
> -{
> +struct deps {
> int nr;
> bool submit_fence;
> struct dep_entry *list;
> @@ -137,8 +136,7 @@ struct working_set {
>
> struct workload;
>
> -struct w_step
> -{
> +struct w_step {
> struct workload *wrk;
>
> /* Workload step metadata */
> @@ -155,7 +153,6 @@ struct w_step
> int period;
> int target;
> int throttle;
> - int fence_signal;
> int priority;
> struct {
> unsigned int engine_map_count;
> @@ -194,8 +191,7 @@ struct ctx {
> uint64_t sseu;
> };
>
> -struct workload
> -{
> +struct workload {
> unsigned int id;
>
> unsigned int nr_steps;
> @@ -807,6 +803,7 @@ static int add_buffers(struct working_set *set, char *str)
>
> for (i = 0; i < add; i++) {
> struct work_buffer_size *sz = &sizes[set->nr + i];
> +
> sz->min = min_sz;
> sz->max = max_sz;
> sz->size = 0;
> @@ -895,13 +892,16 @@ parse_duration(unsigned int nr_steps, struct duration *dur, double scale_dur, ch
> }
>
> #define int_field(_STEP_, _FIELD_, _COND_, _ERR_) \
> - if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) { \
> - tmp = atoi(field); \
> - check_arg(_COND_, _ERR_, nr_steps); \
> - step.type = _STEP_; \
> - step._FIELD_ = tmp; \
> - goto add_step; \
> - } \
> + do { \
> + field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx); \
> + if (field) { \
> + tmp = atoi(field); \
> + check_arg(_COND_, _ERR_, nr_steps); \
> + step.type = _STEP_; \
> + step._FIELD_ = tmp; \
> + goto add_step; \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
>
> static struct workload *
> parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> @@ -926,7 +926,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> valid = 0;
> memset(&step, 0, sizeof(step));
>
> - if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> + field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx);
> + if (field) {
> fstart = NULL;
>
> if (!strcmp(field, "d")) {
> @@ -943,6 +944,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> }
> } else if (!strcmp(field, "P")) {
> unsigned int nr = 0;
> +
> while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> tmp = atoi(field);
> check_arg(nr == 0 && tmp <= 0,
> @@ -968,6 +970,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> "Invalid sync target at step %u!\n");
> } else if (!strcmp(field, "S")) {
> unsigned int nr = 0;
> +
> while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> tmp = atoi(field);
> check_arg(tmp <= 0 && nr == 0,
> @@ -1004,6 +1007,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> goto add_step;
> } else if (!strcmp(field, "M")) {
> unsigned int nr = 0;
> +
> while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> tmp = atoi(field);
> check_arg(nr == 0 && tmp <= 0,
> @@ -1034,6 +1038,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> "Invalid terminate target at step %u!\n");
> } else if (!strcmp(field, "X")) {
> unsigned int nr = 0;
> +
> while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> tmp = atoi(field);
> check_arg(nr == 0 && tmp <= 0,
> @@ -1058,6 +1063,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> goto add_step;
> } else if (!strcmp(field, "B")) {
> unsigned int nr = 0;
> +
> while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> tmp = atoi(field);
> check_arg(nr == 0 && tmp <= 0,
> @@ -1077,6 +1083,7 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> goto add_step;
> } else if (!strcmp(field, "b")) {
> unsigned int nr = 0;
> +
> while ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> check_arg(nr > 2,
> "Invalid bond format at step %u!\n",
> @@ -1148,7 +1155,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> valid++;
> }
>
> - if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> + field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx);
> + if (field) {
> fstart = NULL;
>
> i = str_to_engine(field);
> @@ -1160,7 +1168,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> step.engine = i;
> }
>
> - if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> + field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx);
> + if (field) {
> fstart = NULL;
>
> tmp = parse_duration(nr_steps, &step.duration, scale_dur, field);
> @@ -1170,7 +1179,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> valid++;
> }
>
> - if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> + field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx);
> + if (field) {
> fstart = NULL;
>
> tmp = parse_dependencies(nr_steps, &step, field);
> @@ -1180,7 +1190,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> valid++;
> }
>
> - if ((field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx))) {
> + field = strtok_r(fstart, ".", &fctx);
> + if (field) {
> fstart = NULL;
>
> check_arg(strlen(field) != 1 ||
> @@ -1224,7 +1235,7 @@ add_step:
> nr_steps += app_w->nr_steps;
> }
>
> - wrk = malloc(sizeof(*wrk));
> + wrk = calloc(1, sizeof(*wrk));
Rest looks fine but this change I don't know what checkpatch has against
it and why calloc(1,..) is better. That's the kernels checkpatch.pl? I
don't get it when I run it.
Regards,
Tvrtko
> igt_assert(wrk);
>
> wrk->nr_steps = nr_steps;
> @@ -2717,6 +2728,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>
> if (append_workload_arg) {
> struct w_arg arg = { NULL, append_workload_arg, 0 };
> +
> app_w = parse_workload(&arg, flags, scale_dur, scale_time,
> NULL);
> if (!app_w) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-26 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-26 8:44 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 00/14] [RFC] benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 01/14] lib/igt_device_scan: Xe get integrated/discrete card functions Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 02/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: reposition the unbound duration boolean Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 10:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 03/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: fix scaling of period steps Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 10:28 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 04/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: fix duration range check Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 10:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 05/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: extract duration parsing code to new function Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 10:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 06/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: fix conflicting SSEU #define and enum Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 10:51 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 07/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: cleanups Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 11:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2023-09-27 19:03 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-28 8:37 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 08/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: reposition repeat_start variable Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 11:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 09/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: use lib code to query engines Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 11:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 19:09 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 10/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: allow comments in workload description files Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 11:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 11:48 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-26 12:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 11/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: introduce w_step_sync function Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 11:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 12/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: extract prepare contexts code to new function Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 11:43 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 11:58 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 13/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: extract prepare working sets " Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 11:46 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 8:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 14/14] benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-26 13:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 18:52 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-27 13:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-26 10:03 ` [igt-dev] ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support (rev3) Patchwork
2023-09-26 10:11 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-26 11:56 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support (rev4) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c65e1e57-3000-bf42-09b3-5939acd6ad38@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox