From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Frank.Li@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] ARM: imxrt_defconfig: Remove NOMMU platform support
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 15:55:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260619155534.34F1C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260619-dts_cleanup_arm_mcore-v1-6-0101795a2662@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Leftover references, platform-specific structures, compatible strings, and early console declarations for the removed i.MXRT and VF610M4 platforms remain in multiple drivers and DT bindings.
- [Low] Deleted clock dt-binding header is still included in the `imxrt1050-clock.yaml` dt-binding YAML example, breaking `dt_binding_check`.
--
commit 3968f192513e74f4358aed03401b5e2ab20e266b
Author: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
ARM: imxrt_defconfig: Remove NOMMU platform support
Commercial users and hardware vendors migrated to Zephyr or other RTOS
solutions years ago, leaving the NOMMU platform support effectively
unused and unmaintained.
> Remove the obsolete support to reduce maintenance burden and simplify the
> i.MX platform code.
[Severity: Medium]
Since this series removes the NOMMU platform support for i.MXRT and VF610M4,
should the remaining platform-specific structures and references also be
cleaned up?
There are leftover configurations such as usdhc_imxrt1050_data in
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c:
static struct esdhc_soc_data usdhc_imxrt1050_data = {
imxrt1050_data in drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c:
static const struct lpuart_soc_data imxrt1050_data = {
early console declarations in drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c:
OF_EARLYCON_DECLARE(lpuart32, "fsl,imxrt1050-lpuart", lpuart32_imx_early_console_setup);
and the fsl,vf610m4 compatibility string in arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-vf610.c:
"fsl,vf610m4",
Because the core architecture files and Kconfigs are removed, these remnants
become unreachable orphaned dead code.
[Severity: Low]
Does this series also need to update the dt-binding examples?
The deleted include/dt-bindings/clock/imxrt1050-clock.h header is still
included in the Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imxrt1050-clock.yaml
example block:
#include <dt-bindings/clock/imxrt1050-clock.h>
When the dt_binding_check target attempts to preprocess this YAML example,
the C preprocessor fails with a "No such file or directory" error.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260619-dts_cleanup_arm_mcore-v1-0-0101795a2662@nxp.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-19 15:40 [PATCH 00/11] ARM: NXP: Drop NOMMU platform support Frank.Li
2026-06-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 01/11] ARM: dts: vf610m4: Remove " Frank.Li
2026-06-19 15:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 15:40 ` [PATCH 02/11] ARM: dts: imxrt1050: " Frank.Li
2026-06-19 15:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] ARM: imx: " Frank.Li
2026-06-19 15:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] clk: imx: imxrt1050: " Frank.Li
2026-06-19 15:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 15:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] pinctrl: freescale: IMXRT: " Frank.Li
2026-06-19 15:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] ARM: imxrt_defconfig: " Frank.Li
2026-06-19 15:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-19 15:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] ARM: dts: lpc: " Frank.Li
2026-06-19 15:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 15:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] ARM: mach-lpc: " Frank.Li
2026-06-19 16:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 15:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] ARM: configs: lpc*: " Frank.Li
2026-06-19 15:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 15:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] clk: nxp: lpc: " Frank.Li
2026-06-19 15:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 15:41 ` [PATCH 11/11] pinctrl: " Frank.Li
2026-06-19 16:07 ` [PATCH 00/11] ARM: NXP: Drop " Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-06-19 19:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260619155534.34F1C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox