From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: wei.fang@oss.nxp.com
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 14/14] net: enetc: use kzalloc_flex() for enetc_psfp_gate allocation
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 10:43:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260704104348.5374F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703101328.550714-15-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the error rollback path in `enetc_psfp_hw_set()` breaks existing hardware state by unconditionally reverting shared resources.
--
commit 6d57d48e343452bcc08a00c11bfae2b630b9f68a
Author: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
net: enetc: use kzalloc_flex() for enetc_psfp_gate allocation
This patch replaces the open-coded struct_size() + kzalloc() pattern with
the kzalloc_flex() helper when allocating struct enetc_psfp_gate. This
removes the intermediate entries_size local variable and makes the
allocation site more concise.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> index 7b17bca24f260..2aa0fcaafcd23 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1242,8 +1241,7 @@ static int enetc_psfp_parse_clsflower(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv,
> goto free_filter;
> }
>
> - entries_size = struct_size(sgi, entries, entryg->gate.num_entries);
> - sgi = kzalloc(entries_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + sgi = kzalloc_flex(*sgi, entries, entryg->gate.num_entries);
> if (!sgi) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto free_filter;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing this code I
noticed an issue with the error rollback path in enetc_psfp_hw_set() which is
called shortly after this allocation.
When enetc_psfp_hw_set() fails, it unconditionally disables the stream gate in
hardware:
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c:enetc_psfp_hw_set() {
...
if (fmi) {
err = enetc_flowmeter_hw_set(priv, fmi, true);
if (err)
goto revert_sgi;
}
...
revert_sgi:
enetc_streamgate_hw_set(priv, sgi, false);
...
}
Because enetc_psfp_parse_clsflower() allows stream gates to be shared and
reused across multiple filters (via enetc_get_gate_by_index()), could this
rollback path break existing hardware state?
If a user adds a new tc-flower filter that reuses an existing stream gate
index, and a subsequent hardware setup step fails, the error handling path
blindly calls enetc_streamgate_hw_set(..., false). Will this disable the
already active stream gate and break all other filters relying on it?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260703101328.550714-1-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com?part=14
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-04 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 10:13 [PATCH v3 net-next 00/14] net: enetc: cleanups and improvements wei.fang
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 01/14] net: enetc: extract common helpers for MAC promiscuous mode setting wei.fang
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 02/14] net: enetc: extract common helpers for MAC hash filter configuration wei.fang
2026-07-04 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 03/14] net: enetc: convert ndo_set_rx_mode() to ndo_set_rx_mode_async() wei.fang
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 04/14] net: enetc: improve MAFT entry management with bitmap tracking wei.fang
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 05/14] net: enetc: use PCI device name for debugfs directory wei.fang
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 06/14] net: enetc: simplify enetc4_set_port_speed() wei.fang
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 07/14] net: enetc: differentiate phylink capabilities for pseudo-MAC and standalone MAC wei.fang
2026-07-04 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 1:25 ` Wei Fang (OSS)
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 08/14] net: enetc: remove invalid code from enetc4_pl_mac_link_up() wei.fang
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 09/14] net: enetc: open-code enetc4_set_default_si_vlan_promisc() wei.fang
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 10/14] net: enetc: refactor SI VLAN promiscuous mode configuration wei.fang
2026-07-04 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 1:42 ` Wei Fang (OSS)
2026-07-06 1:45 ` Wei Fang (OSS)
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 11/14] net: enetc: move enetc_set_si_vlan_promisc() to enetc_pf_common.c wei.fang
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 12/14] net: enetc: remove redundant num_vsi field from enetc_port_caps wei.fang
2026-07-04 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 2:27 ` Wei Fang (OSS)
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 13/14] net: enetc: use alloc_etherdev_mqs() to create netdev for VF driver wei.fang
2026-07-04 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 14/14] net: enetc: use kzalloc_flex() for enetc_psfp_gate allocation wei.fang
2026-07-04 10:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260704104348.5374F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wei.fang@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox