From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: wei.fang@oss.nxp.com
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] ptp: netc: use ioread64_lo_hi/iowrite64_lo_hi for 64-bit register access
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:43:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729104313.E82561F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728104548.3301214-2-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The EXTTS event handler loop drains the hardware timestamp FIFO but drops all but the latest event because the event is dispatched outside the loop.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net-next 1/7] ptp: netc: use ioread64_lo_hi/iowrite64_lo_hi for 64-bit register access ---
commit 3efd12fe5d16abdea087944988e6ffe114ea760a
Author: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
ptp: netc: use ioread64_lo_hi/iowrite64_lo_hi for 64-bit register access
This patch replaces the open-coded 64-bit register read/write sequences
with ioread64_lo_hi() and iowrite64_lo_hi() helpers. It introduces two new
macros netc_timer_rd64() and netc_timer_wr64() that wrap these helpers and
uses them throughout the driver to reduce boilerplate.
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_netc.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_netc.c
> --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_netc.c
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_netc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -497,22 +470,19 @@ static void netc_timer_handle_etts_event(struct netc_timer *priv, int index,
> bool update_event)
> {
> struct ptp_clock_event event;
> - u32 etts_l = 0, etts_h = 0;
> + u64 etts = 0;
>
> - while (netc_timer_rd(priv, NETC_TMR_STAT) & TMR_STAT_ETS_VLD(index)) {
> - etts_l = netc_timer_rd(priv, NETC_TMR_ETTS_L(index));
> - etts_h = netc_timer_rd(priv, NETC_TMR_ETTS_H(index));
> - }
> + while (netc_timer_rd(priv, NETC_TMR_STAT) & TMR_STAT_ETS_VLD(index))
> + etts = netc_timer_rd64(priv, NETC_TMR_ETTS_L(index));
>
> /* Invalid time stamp */
> - if (!etts_l && !etts_h)
> + if (!etts)
> return;
>
> if (update_event) {
> event.type = PTP_CLOCK_EXTTS;
> event.index = index;
> - event.timestamp = (u64)etts_h << 32;
> - event.timestamp |= etts_l;
> + event.timestamp = etts;
> ptp_clock_event(priv->clock, &event);
> }
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code drop all but the last
external timestamp event?
When the hardware queues multiple external timestamp events, the while loop
in netc_timer_handle_etts_event() pops all valid timestamps from the hardware
into the local variable etts.
Because ptp_clock_event() is called only once outside the loop, aren't all
prior events silently discarded?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728104548.3301214-1-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 10:45 [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: dsa: netc: add PTP support for NETC switch wei.fang
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] ptp: netc: use ioread64_lo_hi/iowrite64_lo_hi for 64-bit register access wei.fang
2026-07-29 10:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] ptp: netc: remove unnecessary pcie_flr() call in probe wei.fang
2026-07-29 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] ptp: netc: export netc_timer_get_current_time() for cross-driver use wei.fang
2026-07-29 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: dsa: netc: use entry ID instead of pointer to track host flood rule wei.fang
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: dsa: netc: enable ingress port filtering lookup by default wei.fang
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: dsa: netc: add PTP two-step timestamping support wei.fang
2026-07-29 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 13:41 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] net: dsa: netc: add PTP one-step " wei.fang
2026-07-29 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260729104313.E82561F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wei.fang@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox