Linux kernel and device drivers for NXP i.MX platforms
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
To: wei.fang@oss.nxp.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
	vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, xiaoning.wang@nxp.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
	olteanv@gmail.com
Cc: wei.fang@nxp.com, chleroy@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: dsa: netc: add PTP two-step timestamping support
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:41:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59ecaa4e-f111-4dd4-914a-7704990ac58e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728104548.3301214-7-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com>

On 28/07/2026 11:45, wei.fang@oss.nxp.com wrote:
> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> 
> Add two-step TX timestamping and RX timestamping for the NETC switch.
> One-step TX timestamping is not supported yet.
> 
> For RX, install ingress port filter table (IPFT) rules that redirect PTP
> frames to the CPU port. Support L2, L4 over IPv4 and L4 over IPv6, for
> both event and general messages, selected via the hwtstamp rx_filter.
> The hardware prepends a To_Host subtype 1 tag carrying the 64-bit ingress
> timestamp. The tagger extracts it into the skb control buffer, and
> netc_port_rxtstamp() copies it into skb_hwtstamps().
> 
> For two-step TX, clone the skb and allocate a 4-bit timestamp request ID,
> then queue the clone on a per-port list. netc_xmit() emits a To_Port
> subtype 2 tag carrying that ID. The hardware echoes the ID back in a
> generated To_Host subtype 2 response frame together with the 64-bit
> transmit timestamp. The tagger dispatches the ID and timestamp to the
> switch driver through the twostep_tstamp_handler callback registered in
> netc_tagger_data, which matches the queued clone and completes it via
> skb_complete_tx_timestamp(), then frees the response skb. Non-PTP frames
> keep using the To_Port subtype 0 tag on the xmit fast path.
> 
> The two-step response frame carries no payload; its total length is only
> 26 bytes (12 bytes of DMAC and SMAC plus a 14-byte switch tag). By the
> time netc_rcv() sees it, skb->data already points 2 bytes into the switch
> tag, past the TPID shared with the Ethernet header, so skb->len is only
> 12. Since the tag pointer is at (skb->data - 2), the pskb_may_pull() check
> must use NETC_TAG_MAX_LEN - 2 rather than NETC_TAG_MAX_LEN. Otherwise
> pskb_may_pull() drops the response frame and breaks PTP synchronization.
> 
> Add the To_Port subtype 2 and To_Host subtype 1/2 tag structures, extend
> netc_xmit() to select the tag based on ptp_flag in the skb control buffer,
> and add netc_connect()/netc_disconnect() to manage the per-switch
> netc_tagger_data allocation. Grab the PTP timer's pci_dev in netc_setup()
> so get_ts_info() can report its PHC index, and release it in the teardown
> and error paths.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/dsa/netc/Kconfig         |   1 +
>   drivers/net/dsa/netc/Makefile        |   3 +-
>   drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c     |  72 +++++
>   drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_platform.c |   1 +
>   drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_ptp.c      | 411 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_switch.h   |  35 +++
>   include/linux/dsa/tag_netc.h         |  23 ++
>   net/dsa/tag_netc.c                   | 120 +++++++-
>   8 files changed, 658 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_ptp.c

[...]

> +int netc_get_ts_info(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> +		     struct kernel_ethtool_ts_info *info)
> +{
> +	struct netc_switch *priv = ds->priv;
> +
> +	info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE |
> +				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE |
> +				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE;

SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE are available 
by default, no need to add them.

the code doesn't have skb_tx_timestamp() calls, I wonder how is
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE implemented?

> +
> +	info->phc_index = netc_get_phc_index(priv);
> +	if (info->phc_index < 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	info->so_timestamping |= SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE |
> +				 SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE |
> +				 SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE;
> +
> +	info->tx_types = BIT(HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF) | BIT(HWTSTAMP_TX_ON);
> +
> +	info->rx_filters = BIT(HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE) |
> +			   BIT(HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT) |
> +			   BIT(HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_EVENT) |
> +			   BIT(HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_EVENT);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-29 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-28 10:45 [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: dsa: netc: add PTP support for NETC switch wei.fang
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] ptp: netc: use ioread64_lo_hi/iowrite64_lo_hi for 64-bit register access wei.fang
2026-07-29 10:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] ptp: netc: remove unnecessary pcie_flr() call in probe wei.fang
2026-07-29 10:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] ptp: netc: export netc_timer_get_current_time() for cross-driver use wei.fang
2026-07-29 10:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: dsa: netc: use entry ID instead of pointer to track host flood rule wei.fang
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: dsa: netc: enable ingress port filtering lookup by default wei.fang
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: dsa: netc: add PTP two-step timestamping support wei.fang
2026-07-29 10:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 13:41   ` Vadim Fedorenko [this message]
2026-07-28 10:45 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] net: dsa: netc: add PTP one-step " wei.fang
2026-07-29 10:43   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59ecaa4e-f111-4dd4-914a-7704990ac58e@linux.dev \
    --to=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox