* [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp: acquire runtime PM before adding carveouts
@ 2026-08-30 13:33 Pengpeng Hou
2026-08-30 13:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 16:50 ` Mathieu Poirier
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pengpeng Hou @ 2026-08-30 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson
Cc: Pengpeng Hou, Mathieu Poirier, Frank Li, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, linux-remoteproc, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
The prepare callback publishes DSP carveouts before acquiring the
runtime-PM reference that establishes required clocks and mailbox state.
A PM failure therefore leaves the prepare transaction partially
published.
Acquire runtime PM first and drop that reference if carveout
construction fails, so a failed prepare does not add resources before
its hardware prerequisite.
Fixes: ec0e5549f358 ("remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Add remoteproc driver for DSP on i.MX")
Signed-off-by: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
---
drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
index fd60c67ba8a9f..96d619daf3f5b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
@@ -726,14 +726,17 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
int ret;
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
ret = imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout(priv);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed on imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout\n");
+ pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
return ret;
}
- pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
-
return 0;
}
base-commit: 08dbfad3f5040f5bdb6c529da20d6d4e81fefd72
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp: acquire runtime PM before adding carveouts
2026-08-30 13:33 [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp: acquire runtime PM before adding carveouts Pengpeng Hou
@ 2026-08-30 13:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 16:50 ` Mathieu Poirier
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-30 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pengpeng Hou; +Cc: Frank.Li, imx
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] If `imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout()` fails during its iteration, or if later stages like firmware parsing fail after a successful prepare, previously added carveouts and coredump segments are permanently leaked on the remoteproc lists.
- [High] Mailbox channels allocated during runtime resume are leaked if clock enable fails in `imx_dsp_runtime_resume()`.
--
commit 1aa0eaf53776f4fb1deb0e079f298b5ed6746813
Author: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
remoteproc: imx_dsp: acquire runtime PM before adding carveouts
This commit fixes the prepare callback by acquiring the runtime-PM
reference before publishing DSP carveouts. This ensures that if the PM
resume fails, the transaction is not partially published.
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> index fd60c67ba8a9f..96d619daf3f5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> @@ -726,14 +726,17 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> int ret;
>
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but looking at what happens during
this runtime resume, if clk_bulk_prepare_enable() fails in
imx_dsp_runtime_resume(), it returns directly:
drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:imx_dsp_runtime_resume() {
...
ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(DSP_RPROC_CLK_MAX, priv->clks);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed on clk_bulk_prepare_enable\n");
return ret;
}
...
}
Does this bypass imx_dsp_rproc_free_mbox() and permanently leak the exclusive
mailbox channels allocated just above it via imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init()?
Subsequent runtime resume attempts might fail with -EBUSY when
mbox_request_channel_byname() is called again for the same channels, breaking
device functionality.
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> ret = imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout(priv);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed on imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout\n");
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> return ret;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but if imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout() fails
midway through its loop (e.g., returning -ENOMEM or -EINVAL), it returns an
error without freeing earlier allocations.
Furthermore, if this prepare callback fully succeeds but rproc_parse_fw()
subsequently fails in the remoteproc core, the core jumps to the
unprepare_rproc label (which calls imx_dsp_rproc_unprepare) and completely
bypasses rproc_resource_cleanup().
Does this permanently leak the previously added rproc_mem_entry and
rproc_dump_segment objects on the remoteproc lists?
Repeated boot failures could continually append memory to these lists,
eventually causing an out-of-memory condition.
> }
>
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> -
> return 0;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260830133310.6926-1-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp: acquire runtime PM before adding carveouts
2026-08-30 13:33 [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp: acquire runtime PM before adding carveouts Pengpeng Hou
2026-08-30 13:43 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-09-02 16:50 ` Mathieu Poirier
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2026-09-02 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pengpeng Hou
Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Frank Li, Sascha Hauer, Pengutronix Kernel Team,
Fabio Estevam, linux-remoteproc, imx, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel
On Sun, Aug 30, 2026 at 09:33:10PM +0800, Pengpeng Hou wrote:
> The prepare callback publishes DSP carveouts before acquiring the
> runtime-PM reference that establishes required clocks and mailbox state.
> A PM failure therefore leaves the prepare transaction partially
> published.
>
> Acquire runtime PM first and drop that reference if carveout
> construction fails, so a failed prepare does not add resources before
> its hardware prerequisite.
>
> Fixes: ec0e5549f358 ("remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Add remoteproc driver for DSP on i.MX")
> Signed-off-by: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> index fd60c67ba8a9f..96d619daf3f5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> @@ -726,14 +726,17 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> int ret;
>
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> ret = imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout(priv);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed on imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout\n");
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> return ret;
> }
>
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> -
Applied.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> return 0;
> }
>
> base-commit: 08dbfad3f5040f5bdb6c529da20d6d4e81fefd72
> --
> 2.50.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-02 16:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-30 13:33 [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp: acquire runtime PM before adding carveouts Pengpeng Hou
2026-08-30 13:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 16:50 ` Mathieu Poirier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox