From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
"Mathieu Poirier" <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, "Peng Fan" <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<imx@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-imx@nxp.com>, "Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/5] gpio: rpmsg: add generic rpmsg GPIO driver
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:56:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2aa1d063-181f-4145-9f1f-7e3012c4d0af@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313195801.2043306-4-shenwei.wang@nxp.com>
Hello,
On 3/13/26 20:57, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> On an AMP platform, the system may include two processors:
> - An MCU running an RTOS
> - An MPU running Linux
>
> These processors communicate via the RPMSG protocol.
> The driver implements the standard GPIO interface, allowing
> the Linux side to control GPIO controllers which reside in
> the remote processor via RPMSG protocol.
>
> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 17 ++
> drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.c | 596 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 614 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> index b45fb799e36c..cff0fda8a283 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -1892,6 +1892,23 @@ config GPIO_SODAVILLE
>
> endmenu
>
> +menu "RPMSG GPIO drivers"
> + depends on RPMSG
> +
> +config GPIO_RPMSG
> + tristate "Generic RPMSG GPIO support"
> + depends on OF && REMOTEPROC
> + select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
> + default REMOTEPROC
> + help
> + Say yes here to support the generic GPIO functions over the RPMSG
> + bus. Currently supported devices: i.MX7ULP, i.MX8ULP, i.MX8x, and
> + i.MX9x.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> +
> +endmenu
> +
> menu "SPI GPIO expanders"
> depends on SPI_MASTER
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> index c05f7d795c43..501aba56ad68 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_RDC321X) += gpio-rdc321x.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_REALTEK_OTTO) += gpio-realtek-otto.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_REG) += gpio-reg.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ROCKCHIP) += gpio-rockchip.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_RPMSG) += gpio-rpmsg.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_RTD) += gpio-rtd.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SA1100) += gpio-sa1100.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SAMA5D2_PIOBU) += gpio-sama5d2-piobu.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9c609b55bc14
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,596 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2026 NXP
> + *
> + * The driver exports a standard gpiochip interface to control
> + * the GPIO controllers via RPMSG on a remote processor.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/rpmsg.h>
> +#include <linux/virtio_gpio.h>
you still needed to include virtio_gpio.h?
> +
> +#define MAX_PORT_PER_CHANNEL 10
> +#define GPIOS_PER_PORT_DEFAULT 32
> +#define RPMSG_TIMEOUT 1000
I wonder if the timeout is not too high. but
not blocking.
> +
> +/* GPIO RPMSG Type */
> +#define GPIO_RPMSG_SEND 0
> +#define GPIO_RPMSG_REPLY 1
> +#define GPIO_RPMSG_NOTIFY 2
> +
> +struct rpmsg_gpio_packet {
> + u8 type; /* Message type */
> + u8 cmd; /* Command code */
> + u8 port_idx;
> + u8 line;
> + u8 val1;
> + u8 val2;
> +};
> +
> +struct rpmsg_gpio_line {
> + u8 irq_shutdown;
> + u8 irq_unmask;
> + u8 irq_mask;
> + u32 irq_wake_enable;
> + u32 irq_type;
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet msg;
> +};
> +
> +struct rpmsg_gpio_info {
> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev;
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *reply_msg;
> + struct completion cmd_complete;
> + struct mutex lock;
> + void **port_store;
> +};
Except if I missunderstood Mathieu and Bjorn's request:
"reuse all the design-work done in the gpio-virtio"
We should find similar structures here to those defined
in virtio_gpio.h.
struct rpmsg_gpio_config {
__le16 ngpio;
__u8 padding[2];
__le32 gpio_names_size;
};
/* Virtio GPIO Request / Response */
struct virtio_gpio_request {
__le16 type;
__le16 gpio;
__le32 value;
};
struct rpmsg_gpio_response {
__u8 status;
__u8 value;
};
struct rpmsg_gpio_response_get_names {
__u8 status;
__u8 value[];
};
/* Virtio GPIO IRQ Request / Response */
struct rpmsg_gpio_irq_request {
__le16 gpio;
};
struct rpmsg_gpio_irq_response {
__u8 status;
};
> +
> +struct rpmsg_gpio_port {
> + struct gpio_chip gc;
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_line lines[GPIOS_PER_PORT_DEFAULT];
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_info info;
> + u32 ngpios;
> + u32 idx;
> +};
> +
> +struct rpmsg_gpio_fixed_up {
> + int (*send_fixed_up)(struct rpmsg_gpio_info *info, struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *msg);
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *(*recv_fixed_up)(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data);
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * @rproc_name: the name of the remote proc.
> + * @recv_pkt: a pointer to the received packet for protocol fix up.
> + * @protocol_fixed_up: optional callbacks to handle protocol mismatches.
> + * @channel_devices: an array of the devices related to the rpdev.
> + */
> +struct rpdev_drvdata {
> + const char *rproc_name;
> + void *recv_pkt;
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_fixed_up *protocol_fixed_up;
> + void *channel_devices[MAX_PORT_PER_CHANNEL];
> +};
> +
> +static int rpmsg_gpio_send_message(struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port,
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *msg,
> + bool sync)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_info *info = &port->info;
> + struct rpdev_drvdata *drvdata;
> + int ret;
> +
> + drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&info->rpdev->dev);
> + reinit_completion(&info->cmd_complete);
> +
> + if (drvdata->protocol_fixed_up)
> + ret = drvdata->protocol_fixed_up->send_fixed_up(info, msg);
Seems not part of a generic implementation
> + else
> + ret = rpmsg_send(info->rpdev->ept, msg, sizeof(*msg));
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&info->rpdev->dev, "rpmsg_send failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (sync) {
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&info->cmd_complete,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(RPMSG_TIMEOUT));
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + dev_err(&info->rpdev->dev, "rpmsg_send timeout!\n");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + if (info->reply_msg->val1 != 0) {
> + dev_err(&info->rpdev->dev, "remote core replies an error: %d!\n",
> + info->reply_msg->val1);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* copy the reply message */
> + memcpy(&port->lines[info->reply_msg->line].msg,
> + info->reply_msg, sizeof(*info->reply_msg));
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *
> +rpmsg_gpio_msg_init_common(struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port, unsigned int line, u8 cmd)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *msg = &port->lines[line].msg;
> +
> + memset(msg, 0, sizeof(struct rpmsg_gpio_packet));
> + msg->type = GPIO_RPMSG_SEND;
> + msg->cmd = cmd;
> + msg->port_idx = port->idx;
> + msg->line = line;
> +
> + return msg;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmsg_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int line)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *msg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&port->info.lock);
> +
> + msg = rpmsg_gpio_msg_init_common(port, line, VIRTIO_GPIO_MSG_GET_VALUE);
> +
> + ret = rpmsg_gpio_send_message(port, msg, true);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = !!port->lines[line].msg.val2;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmsg_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int line)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *msg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&port->info.lock);
> +
> + msg = rpmsg_gpio_msg_init_common(port, line, VIRTIO_GPIO_MSG_GET_DIRECTION);
> +
> + ret = rpmsg_gpio_send_message(port, msg, true);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + switch (port->lines[line].msg.val2) {
> + case VIRTIO_GPIO_DIRECTION_IN:
> + return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN;
> + case VIRTIO_GPIO_DIRECTION_OUT:
> + return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmsg_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int line)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *msg;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&port->info.lock);
> +
> + msg = rpmsg_gpio_msg_init_common(port, line, VIRTIO_GPIO_MSG_SET_DIRECTION);
> + msg->val1 = VIRTIO_GPIO_DIRECTION_IN;
> +
> + return rpmsg_gpio_send_message(port, msg, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmsg_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int line, int val)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *msg;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&port->info.lock);
> +
> + msg = rpmsg_gpio_msg_init_common(port, line, VIRTIO_GPIO_MSG_SET_VALUE);
> + msg->val1 = val;
> +
> + return rpmsg_gpio_send_message(port, msg, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmsg_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int line, int val)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *msg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&port->info.lock);
> +
> + msg = rpmsg_gpio_msg_init_common(port, line, VIRTIO_GPIO_MSG_SET_DIRECTION);
> + msg->val1 = VIRTIO_GPIO_DIRECTION_OUT;
> +
> + ret = rpmsg_gpio_send_message(port, msg, true);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + msg = rpmsg_gpio_msg_init_common(port, line, VIRTIO_GPIO_MSG_SET_VALUE);
> + msg->val1 = val;
> +
> + return rpmsg_gpio_send_message(port, msg, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int gpio_rpmsg_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + u32 line = d->hwirq;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + switch (type) {
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> + type = VIRTIO_GPIO_IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
> + irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_simple_irq);
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> + type = VIRTIO_GPIO_IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING;
> + irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_simple_irq);
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH:
> + type = VIRTIO_GPIO_IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
> + irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_simple_irq);
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> + type = VIRTIO_GPIO_IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW;
> + irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_level_irq);
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> + type = VIRTIO_GPIO_IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
> + irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_level_irq);
> + break;
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_bad_irq);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + port->lines[line].irq_type = type;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int gpio_rpmsg_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, u32 enable)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + u32 line = d->hwirq;
> +
> + port->lines[line].irq_wake_enable = enable;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This unmask/mask function is invoked in two situations:
> + * - when an interrupt is being set up, and
> + * - after an interrupt has occurred.
> + *
> + * The GPIO driver does not access hardware registers directly.
> + * Instead, it caches all relevant information locally, and then sends
> + * the accumulated state to the remote system at this stage.
> + */
> +static void gpio_rpmsg_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + u32 line = d->hwirq;
> +
> + port->lines[line].irq_unmask = 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void gpio_rpmsg_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + u32 line = d->hwirq;
> +
> + /*
> + * When an interrupt occurs, the remote system masks the interrupt
> + * and then sends a notification to Linux. After Linux processes
> + * that notification, it sends an RPMsg command back to the remote
> + * system to unmask the interrupt again.
> + */
> + port->lines[line].irq_mask = 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void gpio_rpmsg_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + u32 line = d->hwirq;
> +
> + port->lines[line].irq_shutdown = 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void gpio_rpmsg_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&port->info.lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void gpio_rpmsg_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *msg;
> + u32 line = d->hwirq;
> +
> + /*
> + * For mask irq, do nothing here.
> + * The remote system will mask interrupt after an interrupt occurs,
> + * and then send a notification to Linux system. After Linux system
> + * handles the notification, it sends an rpmsg back to the remote
> + * system to unmask this interrupt again.
> + */
> + if (port->lines[line].irq_mask && !port->lines[line].irq_unmask) {
> + port->lines[line].irq_mask = 0;
> + mutex_unlock(&port->info.lock);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + msg = rpmsg_gpio_msg_init_common(port, line, VIRTIO_GPIO_MSG_IRQ_TYPE);
> +
> + if (port->lines[line].irq_shutdown) {
> + port->lines[line].irq_shutdown = 0;
> + msg->val1 = VIRTIO_GPIO_IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> + msg->val2 = 0;
> + } else {
> + /* if irq type is not set, use low level trigger as default. */
> + msg->val1 = port->lines[line].irq_type;
> + if (!msg->val1)
> + msg->val1 = VIRTIO_GPIO_IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW;
> + if (port->lines[line].irq_unmask) {
> + msg->val2 = 0;
> + port->lines[line].irq_unmask = 0;
> + } else /* irq set wake */
> + msg->val2 = port->lines[line].irq_wake_enable;
> + }
> +
> + rpmsg_gpio_send_message(port, msg, false);
> + mutex_unlock(&port->info.lock);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_chip gpio_rpmsg_irq_chip = {
> + .irq_mask = gpio_rpmsg_mask_irq,
> + .irq_unmask = gpio_rpmsg_unmask_irq,
> + .irq_set_wake = gpio_rpmsg_irq_set_wake,
> + .irq_set_type = gpio_rpmsg_irq_set_type,
> + .irq_shutdown = gpio_rpmsg_irq_shutdown,
> + .irq_bus_lock = gpio_rpmsg_irq_bus_lock,
> + .irq_bus_sync_unlock = gpio_rpmsg_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
> + .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
> +};
> +
> +static void rpmsg_gpio_remove_action(void *data)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = data;
> +
> + port->info.port_store[port->idx] = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmsg_gpiochip_register(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + struct rpdev_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&rpdev->dev);
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port;
> + struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;
> + struct gpio_chip *gc;
> + int ret;
> +
> + port = devm_kzalloc(&rpdev->dev, sizeof(*port), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!port)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &port->idx);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (port->idx >= MAX_PORT_PER_CHANNEL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = devm_mutex_init(&rpdev->dev, &port->info.lock);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ngpios", &port->ngpios);
The number of GPIOs should be obtained from the remote side, as done in
virtio_gpio. In virtio_gpio, this is retrieved via a get_config
operation. Here, you could implement a specific RPMsg to retrieve the
remote topology.
> + if (ret || port->ngpios > GPIOS_PER_PORT_DEFAULT)
> + port->ngpios = GPIOS_PER_PORT_DEFAULT;
> +
> + port->info.reply_msg = devm_kzalloc(&rpdev->dev,
> + sizeof(struct rpmsg_gpio_packet),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!port->info.reply_msg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + init_completion(&port->info.cmd_complete);
> + port->info.port_store = drvdata->channel_devices;
> + port->info.port_store[port->idx] = port;
> + port->info.rpdev = rpdev;
> +
> + gc = &port->gc;
> + gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + gc->parent = &rpdev->dev;
> + gc->fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(np);
> + gc->ngpio = port->ngpios;
> + gc->base = -1;
> + gc->label = devm_kasprintf(&rpdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-gpio%d",
> + drvdata->rproc_name, port->idx);
> +
> + gc->direction_input = rpmsg_gpio_direction_input;
> + gc->direction_output = rpmsg_gpio_direction_output;
> + gc->get_direction = rpmsg_gpio_get_direction;
> + gc->get = rpmsg_gpio_get;
> + gc->set = rpmsg_gpio_set;
> +
> + girq = &gc->irq;
> + gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &gpio_rpmsg_irq_chip);
> + girq->parent_handler = NULL;
> + girq->num_parents = 0;
> + girq->parents = NULL;
> + girq->chip->name = devm_kasprintf(&rpdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-gpio%d",
> + drvdata->rproc_name, port->idx);
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&rpdev->dev, rpmsg_gpio_remove_action, port);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&rpdev->dev, gc, port);
> +}
> +
> +static const char *rpmsg_get_rproc_node_name(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> +{
> + const char *name = NULL;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + struct rproc *rproc;
> +
> + rproc = rproc_get_by_child(&rpdev->dev);
> + if (!rproc)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + np = of_node_get(rproc->dev.of_node);
> + if (!np && rproc->dev.parent)
> + np = of_node_get(rproc->dev.parent->of_node);
> +
> + if (np) {
> + name = devm_kstrdup(&rpdev->dev, np->name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + of_node_put(np);
> + }
> +
> + return name;
> +}
> +
> +static struct device_node *
> +rpmsg_get_channel_ofnode(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, char *chan_name)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np_chan = NULL, *np;
> + struct rproc *rproc;
> +
> + rproc = rproc_get_by_child(&rpdev->dev);
> + if (!rproc)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + np = of_node_get(rproc->dev.of_node);
> + if (!np && rproc->dev.parent)
> + np = of_node_get(rproc->dev.parent->of_node);
> +
> + /* The of_node_put() is performed by of_find_node_by_name(). */
> + if (np)
> + np_chan = of_find_node_by_name(np, chan_name);
> +
> + return np_chan;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmsg_gpio_channel_callback(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data,
> + int len, void *priv, u32 src)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_packet *msg = data;
> + struct rpmsg_gpio_port *port = NULL;
> + struct rpdev_drvdata *drvdata;
> +
> + drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&rpdev->dev);
> + if (drvdata && drvdata->protocol_fixed_up)
> + msg = drvdata->protocol_fixed_up->recv_fixed_up(rpdev, data);
> +
> + if (!msg || !drvdata)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (msg->port_idx < MAX_PORT_PER_CHANNEL)
> + port = drvdata->channel_devices[msg->port_idx];
> +
> + if (!port || msg->line >= port->ngpios) {
> + dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "wrong port index or line number. port:%d line:%d\n",
> + msg->port_idx, msg->line);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (msg->type == GPIO_RPMSG_REPLY) {
> + *port->info.reply_msg = *msg;
> + complete(&port->info.cmd_complete);
> + } else if (msg->type == GPIO_RPMSG_NOTIFY) {
> + generic_handle_domain_irq_safe(port->gc.irq.domain, msg->line);
> + } else {
> + dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "wrong command type (0x%x)\n", msg->type);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmsg_gpio_channel_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
> + struct rpdev_drvdata *drvdata;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + int ret = -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (!dev->of_node) {
> + np = rpmsg_get_channel_ofnode(rpdev, rpdev->id.name);
> + if (np) {
> + dev->of_node = np;
> + set_primary_fwnode(dev, of_fwnode_handle(np));
> + }
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
Here is it a bug ? else you should explain in a comment why you perform
some actions when np != 0 but return -EPROBE_DEFER
Regards,
Arnaud
> + }
> +
> + drvdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!drvdata)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + drvdata->rproc_name = rpmsg_get_rproc_node_name(rpdev);
> + drvdata->protocol_fixed_up = (struct rpmsg_gpio_fixed_up *)rpdev->id.driver_data;
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, drvdata);
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node_scoped(dev->of_node, child) {
> + if (!of_device_is_available(child))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!of_match_node(dev->driver->of_match_table, child))
> + continue;
> +
> + ret = rpmsg_gpiochip_register(rpdev, child);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id rpmsg_gpio_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "rpmsg-gpio" },
> + { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +
> +static struct rpmsg_device_id rpmsg_gpio_channel_id_table[] = {
> + { .name = "rpmsg-io" },
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(rpmsg, rpmsg_gpio_channel_id_table);
> +
> +static struct rpmsg_driver rpmsg_gpio_channel_client = {
> + .callback = rpmsg_gpio_channel_callback,
> + .id_table = rpmsg_gpio_channel_id_table,
> + .probe = rpmsg_gpio_channel_probe,
> + .drv = {
> + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> + .of_match_table = rpmsg_gpio_dt_ids,
> + },
> +};
> +module_rpmsg_driver(rpmsg_gpio_channel_client);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("generic rpmsg gpio driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 19:57 [PATCH v12 0/5] Enable Remote GPIO over RPMSG on i.MX Platform Shenwei Wang
2026-03-13 19:57 ` [PATCH v12 1/5] docs: driver-api: gpio: rpmsg gpio driver over rpmsg bus Shenwei Wang
2026-03-13 19:57 ` [PATCH v12 2/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add "rpmsg" subnode support Shenwei Wang
2026-03-13 19:57 ` [PATCH v12 3/5] gpio: rpmsg: add generic rpmsg GPIO driver Shenwei Wang
2026-03-17 8:56 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2026-03-17 14:11 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-03-17 16:16 ` Shenwei Wang
2026-03-18 16:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-03-18 18:45 ` Shenwei Wang
2026-03-18 19:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-03-18 20:11 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-03-18 20:31 ` Shenwei Wang
2026-03-20 13:23 ` Linus Walleij
2026-03-17 14:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-03-17 15:59 ` Shenwei Wang
2026-03-17 16:40 ` Shenwei Wang
2026-03-23 13:51 ` Shenwei Wang
2026-03-13 19:58 ` [PATCH v12 4/5] gpio: rpmsg: add support for NXP legacy firmware protocol Shenwei Wang
2026-03-13 19:58 ` [PATCH v12 5/5] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: Add rpmsg node under imx_rproc Shenwei Wang
2026-03-16 14:23 ` [PATCH v12 0/5] Enable Remote GPIO over RPMSG on i.MX Platform Linus Walleij
2026-03-16 16:00 ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-03-19 13:43 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2aa1d063-181f-4145-9f1f-7e3012c4d0af@foss.st.com \
--to=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox