Linux kernel and device drivers for NXP i.MX platforms
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Cc: claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
	xiaoning.wang@nxp.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: enetc: add Rx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 11:21:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyzpJaRu9KWiEW8N@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241107033817.1654163-2-wei.fang@nxp.com>

On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:38:13AM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> ENETC rev 4.1 supports TCP and UDP checksum offload for receive, the bit
> 108 of the Rx BD will be set if the TCP/UDP checksum is correct. Since
> this capability is not defined in register, the rx_csum bit is added to
> struct enetc_drvdata to indicate whether the device supports Rx checksum
> offload.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>

>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c       | 14 ++++++++++----
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h       |  2 ++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h    |  2 ++
>  .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c |  3 +++
>  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> index 35634c516e26..3137b6ee62d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> @@ -1011,10 +1011,15 @@ static void enetc_get_offloads(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring,
>
>  	/* TODO: hashing */
>  	if (rx_ring->ndev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) {
> -		u16 inet_csum = le16_to_cpu(rxbd->r.inet_csum);
> -
> -		skb->csum = csum_unfold((__force __sum16)~htons(inet_csum));
> -		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_COMPLETE;
> +		if (priv->active_offloads & ENETC_F_RXCSUM &&
> +		    le16_to_cpu(rxbd->r.flags) & ENETC_RXBD_FLAG_L4_CSUM_OK) {
> +			skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> +		} else {
> +			u16 inet_csum = le16_to_cpu(rxbd->r.inet_csum);
> +
> +			skb->csum = csum_unfold((__force __sum16)~htons(inet_csum));
> +			skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_COMPLETE;
> +		}
>  	}
>
>  	if (le16_to_cpu(rxbd->r.flags) & ENETC_RXBD_FLAG_VLAN) {
> @@ -3281,6 +3286,7 @@ static const struct enetc_drvdata enetc_pf_data = {
>  static const struct enetc_drvdata enetc4_pf_data = {
>  	.sysclk_freq = ENETC_CLK_333M,
>  	.pmac_offset = ENETC4_PMAC_OFFSET,
> +	.rx_csum = 1,
>  	.eth_ops = &enetc4_pf_ethtool_ops,
>  };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> index 72fa03dbc2dd..5b65f79e05be 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> @@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ enum enetc_errata {
>
>  struct enetc_drvdata {
>  	u32 pmac_offset; /* Only valid for PSI which supports 802.1Qbu */
> +	u8 rx_csum:1;
>  	u64 sysclk_freq;
>  	const struct ethtool_ops *eth_ops;
>  };
> @@ -341,6 +342,7 @@ enum enetc_active_offloads {
>  	ENETC_F_QBV			= BIT(9),
>  	ENETC_F_QCI			= BIT(10),
>  	ENETC_F_QBU			= BIT(11),
> +	ENETC_F_RXCSUM			= BIT(12),
>  };
>
>  enum enetc_flags_bit {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> index 7c3285584f8a..4b8fd1879005 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> @@ -645,6 +645,8 @@ union enetc_rx_bd {
>  #define ENETC_RXBD_LSTATUS(flags)	((flags) << 16)
>  #define ENETC_RXBD_FLAG_VLAN	BIT(9)
>  #define ENETC_RXBD_FLAG_TSTMP	BIT(10)
> +/* UDP and TCP checksum offload, for ENETC 4.1 and later */
> +#define ENETC_RXBD_FLAG_L4_CSUM_OK	BIT(12)
>  #define ENETC_RXBD_FLAG_TPID	GENMASK(1, 0)
>
>  #define ENETC_MAC_ADDR_FILT_CNT	8 /* # of supported entries per port */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> index 0eecfc833164..91e79582a541 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
>
>  	ndev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT;
>
> +	if (si->drvdata->rx_csum)
> +		priv->active_offloads |= ENETC_F_RXCSUM;
> +
>  	/* TODO: currently, i.MX95 ENETC driver does not support advanced features */
>  	if (!is_enetc_rev1(si)) {
>  		ndev->hw_features &= ~(NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER | NETIF_F_LOOPBACK);
> --
> 2.34.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-07 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-07  3:38 [PATCH net-next 0/5] Add more feautues for ENETC v4 - round 1 Wei Fang
2024-11-07  3:38 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: enetc: add Rx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC Wei Fang
2024-11-07 16:21   ` Frank Li [this message]
2024-11-07  3:38 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: enetc: add Tx " Wei Fang
2024-11-07 16:29   ` Frank Li
2024-11-08  1:32     ` Wei Fang
2024-11-07  3:38 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: enetc: update max chained Tx BD number " Wei Fang
2024-11-07 16:31   ` Frank Li
2024-11-07  3:38 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
2024-11-07 16:38   ` Frank Li
2024-11-07  3:38 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload support Wei Fang
2024-11-07 16:50   ` Frank Li
2024-11-07  9:12 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] Add more feautues for ENETC v4 - round 1 Hariprasad Kelam
2024-11-07  9:52   ` Wei Fang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyzpJaRu9KWiEW8N@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox