Linux kernel and device drivers for NXP i.MX platforms
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/10] gpio: mxc: use local dev variable
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 11:03:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-162905@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007-gpio-mxc-cleanup-v4-8-c9f5a8b50df9@nxp.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] pm: devres double-put of runtime PM reference on driver unbind
- [Medium] gpio: mxc: double clock disable on driver unbind due to devm_clk_get_optional_enabled and runtime PM
--

commit 22e651b0a155c89a26d690a7e46fed22ae9cc238
Author: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

gpio: mxc: use local dev variable

Introduce a local 'struct device *dev' variable to replace repeated
'&pdev->dev' dereferences throughout mxc_gpio_probe(), improving
readability.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> index f5f9ef1564cdf..9d69524e06dbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -481,17 +482,17 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return port->irq;
>  
>  	/* the controller clock is optional */
> -	port->clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +	port->clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, NULL);

[Severity: Medium]
Does this code lead to a double clock disable during driver unbind?

By using devm_clk_get_optional_enabled() here, a devres action is queued to
disable the clock when the device is unbound. However, when the device is
removed, the driver core calls pm_runtime_put_sync() to synchronously suspend
it, which triggers mxc_gpio_runtime_suspend() and disables the clock:

drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c:mxc_gpio_runtime_suspend() {
    ...
    clk_disable_unprepare(port->clk);
    ...
}

Afterwards, the devres cleanup sequence runs (leaving the device suspended)
and unconditionally executes the devm clock release action. Won't this call
clk_disable_unprepare() again on an already-disabled clock and trigger a
warning in the clock core?

>  	if (IS_ERR(port->clk))
>  		return PTR_ERR(port->clk);
>  
> -	err = devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
> +	err = devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);

[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a devres double-put of the runtime PM reference on driver
unbind?

Using devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume() acquires a runtime PM usage count and
queues a devres action (pm_runtime_put_noidle_action) to release it upon
unbind.

>  	if (err)
> -		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, err, "Failed to get PM runtime\n");
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Failed to get PM runtime\n");
[ ... ]
> @@ -531,41 +532,41 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
[ ... ]
>  	list_add_tail(&port->node, &mxc_gpio_ports);
>  
>  	mxc_update_irq_chained_handler(port, true);
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);
> -	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> +	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);

[Severity: High]
Since gpio-mxc has no .remove callback to re-acquire the reference, won't
unbinding the driver (e.g. via unregistering the platform device) execute the
devres action queued by devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume(), causing a double-put?

Although pm_runtime_put_noidle() uses atomic_add_unless() to prevent the usage
counter from dropping mathematically below 0, this double-put could steal a
reference if another component is holding one. Can this accounting error cause
the device to prematurely runtime-suspend while still in use, leading to
unclocked hardware register access faults?

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007-gpio-mxc-cleanup-v4-0-c9f5a8b50df9@nxp.com?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-07 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-07 10:44 [PATCH v4 00/10] gpio: mxc: bug fixes and probe cleanup Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] gpio: mxc: fix race between chained IRQ handler install and probe completion Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  9:44     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-10-09  0:57       ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] gpio: mxc: fix wakeup_pads bit operations Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 19:59   ` Frank Li
2026-10-09  0:59     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] gpio: mxc: use for_each_set_bit() to iterate wakeup pads Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:00   ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] gpio: mxc: replace of_device_is_compatible() with hwdata flags Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:05   ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] gpio: mxc: convert pad wakeup compatible checks to " Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:10   ` Frank Li
2026-10-09  1:00     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] gpio: mxc: convert probe error handling to devres Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  9:47     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-10-09  2:25       ` Peng Fan
2026-10-08 20:12   ` Frank Li
2026-10-09  2:18     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] gpio: mxc: switch probe error paths to dev_err_probe() Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 11:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 20:15   ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] gpio: mxc: use local dev variable Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 11:03   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-08 20:16   ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] gpio: mxc: introduce MXC_ICR macros and use field_prep/field_get Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:25   ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] gpio: mxc: use BIT() macro for single-bit operations Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09  2:32     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-08 20:26   ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-162905@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox