From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/10] gpio: mxc: use local dev variable
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 11:03:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-162905@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007-gpio-mxc-cleanup-v4-8-c9f5a8b50df9@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] pm: devres double-put of runtime PM reference on driver unbind
- [Medium] gpio: mxc: double clock disable on driver unbind due to devm_clk_get_optional_enabled and runtime PM
--
commit 22e651b0a155c89a26d690a7e46fed22ae9cc238
Author: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
gpio: mxc: use local dev variable
Introduce a local 'struct device *dev' variable to replace repeated
'&pdev->dev' dereferences throughout mxc_gpio_probe(), improving
readability.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> index f5f9ef1564cdf..9d69524e06dbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -481,17 +482,17 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return port->irq;
>
> /* the controller clock is optional */
> - port->clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + port->clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, NULL);
[Severity: Medium]
Does this code lead to a double clock disable during driver unbind?
By using devm_clk_get_optional_enabled() here, a devres action is queued to
disable the clock when the device is unbound. However, when the device is
removed, the driver core calls pm_runtime_put_sync() to synchronously suspend
it, which triggers mxc_gpio_runtime_suspend() and disables the clock:
drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c:mxc_gpio_runtime_suspend() {
...
clk_disable_unprepare(port->clk);
...
}
Afterwards, the devres cleanup sequence runs (leaving the device suspended)
and unconditionally executes the devm clock release action. Won't this call
clk_disable_unprepare() again on an already-disabled clock and trigger a
warning in the clock core?
> if (IS_ERR(port->clk))
> return PTR_ERR(port->clk);
>
> - err = devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
> + err = devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a devres double-put of the runtime PM reference on driver
unbind?
Using devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume() acquires a runtime PM usage count and
queues a devres action (pm_runtime_put_noidle_action) to release it upon
unbind.
> if (err)
> - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, err, "Failed to get PM runtime\n");
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Failed to get PM runtime\n");
[ ... ]
> @@ -531,41 +532,41 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
[ ... ]
> list_add_tail(&port->node, &mxc_gpio_ports);
>
> mxc_update_irq_chained_handler(port, true);
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);
> - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
[Severity: High]
Since gpio-mxc has no .remove callback to re-acquire the reference, won't
unbinding the driver (e.g. via unregistering the platform device) execute the
devres action queued by devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume(), causing a double-put?
Although pm_runtime_put_noidle() uses atomic_add_unless() to prevent the usage
counter from dropping mathematically below 0, this double-put could steal a
reference if another component is holding one. Can this accounting error cause
the device to prematurely runtime-suspend while still in use, leading to
unclocked hardware register access faults?
>
> return 0;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007-gpio-mxc-cleanup-v4-0-c9f5a8b50df9@nxp.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 10:44 [PATCH v4 00/10] gpio: mxc: bug fixes and probe cleanup Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] gpio: mxc: fix race between chained IRQ handler install and probe completion Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 9:44 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-10-09 0:57 ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] gpio: mxc: fix wakeup_pads bit operations Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 19:59 ` Frank Li
2026-10-09 0:59 ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] gpio: mxc: use for_each_set_bit() to iterate wakeup pads Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:00 ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] gpio: mxc: replace of_device_is_compatible() with hwdata flags Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:05 ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] gpio: mxc: convert pad wakeup compatible checks to " Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:10 ` Frank Li
2026-10-09 1:00 ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] gpio: mxc: convert probe error handling to devres Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 9:47 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-10-09 2:25 ` Peng Fan
2026-10-08 20:12 ` Frank Li
2026-10-09 2:18 ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] gpio: mxc: switch probe error paths to dev_err_probe() Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 11:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 20:15 ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] gpio: mxc: use local dev variable Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 11:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-08 20:16 ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] gpio: mxc: introduce MXC_ICR macros and use field_prep/field_get Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:25 ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] gpio: mxc: use BIT() macro for single-bit operations Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 2:32 ` Peng Fan
2026-10-08 20:26 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-162905@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox