From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Zhipeng.wang_1@oss.nxp.com
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Let devres own the clock
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 09:13:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-163905@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008090231.796511-7-Zhipeng.wang_1@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] pm: clock underflow warning on devres cleanup if pm_runtime_resume_and_get() fails
--
commit 7ea8370844753a72ff02a8217ace864b04cf2175
Author: Zhipeng Wang <zhipeng.wang_1@nxp.com>
irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Let devres own the clock
This commit transitions the imx-irqsteer driver to use devm_clk_get_enabled()
for clock lifecycle management. It also limits runtime PM callbacks to
clk_enable() and clk_disable() since preparation is handled by devres.
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c
> index fa233de9bc2b2..15ee50f65d54c 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -273,15 +266,23 @@ static int imx_irqsteer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
>
> return 0;
> -out:
> - clk_disable_unprepare(data->ipg_clk);
> - return ret;
> }
>
> static void imx_irqsteer_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct irqsteer_data *irqsteer_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - int i;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * The device may be runtime-suspended here, in which case the runtime
> + * suspend callback has already dropped the clock enable count. Resume
> + * it so the devres clk_disable_unprepare(), which runs after remove(),
> + * finds the clock enabled and stays balanced. On success drop the
> + * usage count again with pm_runtime_put_noidle(): it must not trigger a
> + * suspend (which would re-disable the clock) and must not leak to the
> + * next probe of this persistent device.
> + */
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
>
> for (i = 0; i < irqsteer_data->irq_count; i++) {
> if (!irqsteer_data->irq[i])
> @@ -294,8 +295,8 @@ static void imx_irqsteer_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> irq_domain_remove(irqsteer_data->domain);
>
> - if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&pdev->dev))
> - clk_disable_unprepare(irqsteer_data->ipg_clk);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
[Severity: Medium]
If pm_runtime_resume_and_get() fails, the device remains suspended and its
clock remains disabled.
Since devres owns the clock via devm_clk_get_enabled(), won't devres
unconditionally call clk_disable_unprepare() after imx_irqsteer_remove()
returns?
Could this trigger a WARN(core->enable_count == 0) in the clock framework and
unbalance the clock state?
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261008090231.796511-1-Zhipeng.wang_1@oss.nxp.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 9:02 [PATCH v6 0/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Allow building as module Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-10-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Call chained_irq_exit() on the handler error path Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-10-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Validate IRQ count before creating domain Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-10-08 20:36 ` Frank Li
2026-10-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Dispose of parent IRQ mappings in remove() Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-10-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Convert to devm_pm_runtime_set_active_enabled() Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-10-08 9:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 20:46 ` Frank Li
2026-10-10 8:38 ` Zhipeng Wang (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:41 ` Frank Li
2026-10-10 8:26 ` Zhipeng Wang (OSS)
2026-10-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Mask all interrupts in probe() Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-10-08 9:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 20:59 ` Frank Li
2026-10-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Let devres own the clock Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-10-08 9:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-08 20:54 ` Frank Li
2026-10-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Allow building as module Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-10-08 9:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] genirq/irqdomain: Add devm_irq_domain_create_linear() Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-10-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Use devm_irq_domain_create_linear() Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-10-08 9:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 21:01 ` Frank Li
2026-10-10 9:06 ` Zhipeng Wang (OSS)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-163905@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Zhipeng.wang_1@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox