From: Seewer Philippe <philippe.seewer-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
To: Bill Nottingham <notting-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "<initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>"
<initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH] Delay netroot mounting by 1 second
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:51:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3BA5EA.3020202@bfh.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090619144705.GD2514-Zdt1ptygihhQcNjhGXsBABcY2uh10dtjAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Seewer Philippe (philippe.seewer-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org) said:
>> While testing in our production environment, I discovered
>> that the time between interface configuration and trying to mount the nfs
>> root is too short if the dhcp-server provides an mtu. Having to set a mtu
>> means that netroot
>> executes 'ip link down', set's the mtu and the does
>> 'ip link up' again.
>>
>> This results in the mount error "No route to host", because
>> the network equipment has not had enough time to "shake hands". The patch
>> below adds a sleep 1 after interface configuration, to give the equipment
>> enough time.
>
> Depending on your switch configuration, the time for the switch to start
> passing traffic again on link bounce couuld be anywhere from 0.1 seconds
> to 20 seconds...
Quite correct. Up until now I've fared well with adding 1-5 second
sleeps to my stuff. But yes it could even take longer. Any ideas how to
solve this better?
Regards,
Philippe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-19 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-19 13:45 [RFT PATCH] Delay netroot mounting by 1 second Seewer Philippe
[not found] ` <4A3B968C.5070600-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-19 14:47 ` Bill Nottingham
[not found] ` <20090619144705.GD2514-Zdt1ptygihhQcNjhGXsBABcY2uh10dtjAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-19 14:51 ` Seewer Philippe [this message]
[not found] ` <4A3BA5EA.3020202-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-19 15:06 ` Bill Nottingham
2009-06-19 15:06 ` Warren Togami
2009-06-19 16:08 ` Victor Lowther
[not found] ` <84DF1DC6-5F06-4D6D-91A4-56D996D229B1-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-19 16:19 ` David Dillow
[not found] ` <1245428342.32104.3.camel-FqX9LgGZnHWDB2HL1qBt2PIbXMQ5te18@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-19 16:58 ` Warren Togami
2009-06-22 7:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <4A3F37B8.7050902-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-22 15:10 ` David Dillow
[not found] ` <1245683450.3544.6.camel-1q1vX8mYZiGLUyTwlgNVppKKF0rrzTr+@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-22 16:17 ` Seewer Philippe
[not found] ` <4A3FAE9E.5000201-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-22 17:17 ` David Dillow
[not found] ` <1245691069.3875.11.camel-FqX9LgGZnHWDB2HL1qBt2PIbXMQ5te18@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-22 18:47 ` Seewer Philippe
[not found] ` <4A3FD1C5.30006-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-22 21:02 ` David Dillow
[not found] ` <1245704521.3875.31.camel-FqX9LgGZnHWDB2HL1qBt2PIbXMQ5te18@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-23 7:31 ` Seewer Philippe
[not found] ` <4A4084D3.3060705-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-23 16:16 ` David Dillow
[not found] ` <1245773764.11486.21.camel-FqX9LgGZnHWDB2HL1qBt2PIbXMQ5te18@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-24 6:56 ` Seewer Philippe
[not found] ` <4A41CE20.5000809-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-25 3:30 ` David Dillow
[not found] ` <1245900638.22064.24.camel-1q1vX8mYZiGLUyTwlgNVppKKF0rrzTr+@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-25 4:37 ` David Dillow
2009-06-22 17:22 ` David Dillow
2009-06-24 8:29 ` Bogdan Costescu
2009-06-22 16:06 ` Seewer Philippe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A3BA5EA.3020202@bfh.ch \
--to=philippe.seewer-omb+w0dpw2o@public.gmane.org \
--cc=initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=notting-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox