* udev question
@ 2010-10-25 17:46 Mr Dash Four
[not found] ` <4CC5C26B.9060002-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mr Dash Four @ 2010-10-25 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: initramfs
A simple question: in /etc/udev/rules.d/ (on the root partition!) I have
a .rules file for one of my smartcard devices which has, among other
things, this statement:
PROGRAM="/bin/sleep 0.1"
This program is not on the initramfs image, but it is in the /bin
directory on the root partition. I was under the impression that root is
not mounted until udev has finished its job - is that not the case? If
so, how is this program executed then? I also have a lot of other
statements with RUN+=... which also refer to executables not present in
initramfs - they are all present in the root partition. When/How do
these execute then?
Am I missing something fundamental here?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <4CC5C26B.9060002-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: udev question [not found] ` <4CC5C26B.9060002-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2010-10-26 11:04 ` Harald Hoyer [not found] ` <4CC6B5BD.2020603-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Harald Hoyer @ 2010-10-26 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mr Dash Four; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On 10/25/2010 07:46 PM, Mr Dash Four wrote: > A simple question: in /etc/udev/rules.d/ (on the root partition!) I have a > .rules file for one of my smartcard devices which has, among other things, this > statement: > > PROGRAM="/bin/sleep 0.1" > > This program is not on the initramfs image, but it is in the /bin directory on > the root partition. I was under the impression that root is not mounted until > udev has finished its job - is that not the case? If so, how is this program > executed then? I also have a lot of other statements with RUN+=... which also > refer to executables not present in initramfs - they are all present in the root > partition. When/How do these execute then? > > Am I missing something fundamental here? udev runs a second time in the real root, just because of this limitation of the initramfs. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4CC6B5BD.2020603-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: udev question [not found] ` <4CC6B5BD.2020603-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2010-10-26 11:20 ` Mr Dash Four [not found] ` <4CC6B993.1040808-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mr Dash Four @ 2010-10-26 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Harald Hoyer; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org >> >> Am I missing something fundamental here? > > udev runs a second time in the real root, just because of this > limitation of the initramfs. Yeah, I sort of figured it out yesterday after running a 'probe' version of the '90crypt; module. I have another udev-related query though - if multiple rules register for the same udev triggers (like ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=='crypto_LUKS') how are they executed and can the order of execution be controlled? The reason I am asking this is because, as it turns out, I may need to design a separate module for smartcard tokens to be used with LUKS and the way I see this is when LUKS partition gets matched by udev the smartcard module needs to get the first go (for all smartcard-specified LUKS partitions) then 90crypt (with key file login, possibly falling back on password authentication if the key file data is not successful - though this, as far as I can see, is not yet implemented!). Unfortunately, my udev knowledge is not that much to know is that possible, hence the my query. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4CC6B993.1040808-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: udev question [not found] ` <4CC6B993.1040808-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2010-10-26 11:24 ` Harald Hoyer [not found] ` <4CC6BA51.5030906-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Harald Hoyer @ 2010-10-26 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mr Dash Four; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On 10/26/2010 01:20 PM, Mr Dash Four wrote: > >>> >>> Am I missing something fundamental here? >> >> udev runs a second time in the real root, just because of this limitation of >> the initramfs. > Yeah, I sort of figured it out yesterday after running a 'probe' version of the > '90crypt; module. I have another udev-related query though - if multiple rules > register for the same udev triggers (like ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=='crypto_LUKS') how > are they executed and can the order of execution be controlled? > > The reason I am asking this is because, as it turns out, I may need to design a > separate module for smartcard tokens to be used with LUKS and the way I see this > is when LUKS partition gets matched by udev the smartcard module needs to get > the first go (for all smartcard-specified LUKS partitions) then 90crypt (with > key file login, possibly falling back on password authentication if the key file > data is not successful - though this, as far as I can see, is not yet > implemented!). > > Unfortunately, my udev knowledge is not that much to know is that possible, > hence the my query. place it in a udev rules file with a lower number... first come, first serve. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4CC6BA51.5030906-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: udev question [not found] ` <4CC6BA51.5030906-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2010-10-26 11:30 ` Mr Dash Four 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Mr Dash Four @ 2010-10-26 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Harald Hoyer; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org >> Unfortunately, my udev knowledge is not that much to know is that >> possible, >> hence the my query. > > place it in a udev rules file with a lower number... first come, first > serve. In other words if I do udev/rules.d/65token.rules that should be enough, right? I also presume that once the /tmp/crypt-root-asked-$2 is set 90crypt won't touch it. Is that right? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-26 11:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-25 17:46 udev question Mr Dash Four
[not found] ` <4CC5C26B.9060002-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-26 11:04 ` Harald Hoyer
[not found] ` <4CC6B5BD.2020603-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-26 11:20 ` Mr Dash Four
[not found] ` <4CC6B993.1040808-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-26 11:24 ` Harald Hoyer
[not found] ` <4CC6BA51.5030906-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-26 11:30 ` Mr Dash Four
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox