* rdshell and rdbreak
@ 2011-09-29 6:43 Dave Young
[not found] ` <4E8413A6.2090804-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Young @ 2011-09-29 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Hi,
For kernel developers sometimes boot-test need a minimal initrd, so just
drop into a shell is a nice feature.
The first impression of param 'rdshell' to me is it will drop me into a
shell, but It doesn't. It drop into shell only when initramfs fails.
The rdbreak is more near what I want, but it still fails when no root
args set in cmdline.
IMO initrd can provide such options at least: dropping into shell
without mount rootfs, user can mount by himself or do other things.
Thus, if it make sense how about add a:
rdbreak=force
OTOH, rdshell can be merged into rdbreak as:
rdbreak=fail
Any comments about this?
--
Thanks
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <4E8413A6.2090804-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: rdshell and rdbreak [not found] ` <4E8413A6.2090804-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2011-09-29 8:24 ` Harald Hoyer [not found] ` <4E842B3C.4080707-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Harald Hoyer @ 2011-09-29 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Young; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 09/29/2011 08:43 AM, Dave Young wrote: > Hi, > > For kernel developers sometimes boot-test need a minimal initrd, so just > drop into a shell is a nice feature. > > The first impression of param 'rdshell' to me is it will drop me into a > shell, but It doesn't. It drop into shell only when initramfs fails. > > The rdbreak is more near what I want, but it still fails when no root > args set in cmdline. > > IMO initrd can provide such options at least: dropping into shell > without mount rootfs, user can mount by himself or do other things. > > Thus, if it make sense how about add a: > rdbreak=force > > OTOH, rdshell can be merged into rdbreak as: > rdbreak=fail > > Any comments about this? what about "rdshell rdbreak=cmdline" or in new syntax "rd.shell=1 rd.break=cmdline" ?? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4E842B3C.4080707-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: rdshell and rdbreak [not found] ` <4E842B3C.4080707-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2011-09-29 9:20 ` Dave Young [not found] ` <4E843879.9010000-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Dave Young @ 2011-09-29 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Harald Hoyer; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 09/29/2011 04:24 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote: > On 09/29/2011 08:43 AM, Dave Young wrote: >> Hi, >> >> For kernel developers sometimes boot-test need a minimal initrd, so just >> drop into a shell is a nice feature. >> >> The first impression of param 'rdshell' to me is it will drop me into a >> shell, but It doesn't. It drop into shell only when initramfs fails. >> >> The rdbreak is more near what I want, but it still fails when no root >> args set in cmdline. >> >> IMO initrd can provide such options at least: dropping into shell >> without mount rootfs, user can mount by himself or do other things. >> >> Thus, if it make sense how about add a: >> rdbreak=force >> >> OTOH, rdshell can be merged into rdbreak as: >> rdbreak=fail >> >> Any comments about this? > > what about "rdshell rdbreak=cmdline" or > in new syntax "rd.shell=1 rd.break=cmdline" ?? Thanks for comment, harald I think it's still not so convenience to use two params for this issue, and 'cmdline' also looks a little confuse for me. But it's up to you so long as we can managed to have this feature. -- Thanks Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4E843879.9010000-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: rdshell and rdbreak [not found] ` <4E843879.9010000-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2011-09-29 9:42 ` Dave Young [not found] ` <4E843D6B.9040302-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Dave Young @ 2011-09-29 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Harald Hoyer; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 09/29/2011 05:20 PM, Dave Young wrote: > On 09/29/2011 04:24 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote: > >> On 09/29/2011 08:43 AM, Dave Young wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> For kernel developers sometimes boot-test need a minimal initrd, so just >>> drop into a shell is a nice feature. >>> >>> The first impression of param 'rdshell' to me is it will drop me into a >>> shell, but It doesn't. It drop into shell only when initramfs fails. >>> >>> The rdbreak is more near what I want, but it still fails when no root >>> args set in cmdline. >>> >>> IMO initrd can provide such options at least: dropping into shell >>> without mount rootfs, user can mount by himself or do other things. >>> >>> Thus, if it make sense how about add a: >>> rdbreak=force >>> >>> OTOH, rdshell can be merged into rdbreak as: >>> rdbreak=fail >>> >>> Any comments about this? >> >> what about "rdshell rdbreak=cmdline" or >> in new syntax "rd.shell=1 rd.break=cmdline" ?? > > > Thanks for comment, harald > > I think it's still not so convenience to use two params for this issue, > and 'cmdline' also looks a little confuse for me. But it's up to you so > long as we can managed to have this feature. Just tested, It works gracefully, thanks see cmdline means break before cmdline, It is clear enough also -- Thanks Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4E843D6B.9040302-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: rdshell and rdbreak [not found] ` <4E843D6B.9040302-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2011-09-29 9:44 ` Dave Young 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Dave Young @ 2011-09-29 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Harald Hoyer; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 09/29/2011 05:42 PM, Dave Young wrote: > On 09/29/2011 05:20 PM, Dave Young wrote: > >> On 09/29/2011 04:24 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> >>> On 09/29/2011 08:43 AM, Dave Young wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> For kernel developers sometimes boot-test need a minimal initrd, so just >>>> drop into a shell is a nice feature. >>>> >>>> The first impression of param 'rdshell' to me is it will drop me into a >>>> shell, but It doesn't. It drop into shell only when initramfs fails. >>>> >>>> The rdbreak is more near what I want, but it still fails when no root >>>> args set in cmdline. >>>> >>>> IMO initrd can provide such options at least: dropping into shell >>>> without mount rootfs, user can mount by himself or do other things. >>>> >>>> Thus, if it make sense how about add a: >>>> rdbreak=force >>>> >>>> OTOH, rdshell can be merged into rdbreak as: >>>> rdbreak=fail >>>> >>>> Any comments about this? >>> >>> what about "rdshell rdbreak=cmdline" or >>> in new syntax "rd.shell=1 rd.break=cmdline" ?? >> >> >> Thanks for comment, harald >> >> I think it's still not so convenience to use two params for this issue, >> and 'cmdline' also looks a little confuse for me. But it's up to you so >> long as we can managed to have this feature. > > > Just tested, It works gracefully, thanks > > see cmdline means break before cmdline, It is clear enough also > BTW, The fedora wiki is outdated :) -- Thanks Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-29 9:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-29 6:43 rdshell and rdbreak Dave Young
[not found] ` <4E8413A6.2090804-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-29 8:24 ` Harald Hoyer
[not found] ` <4E842B3C.4080707-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-29 9:20 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <4E843879.9010000-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-29 9:42 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <4E843D6B.9040302-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-29 9:44 ` Dave Young
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox