* [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot
@ 2012-01-30 6:43 Dave Young
2012-01-30 8:33 ` Cong Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dave Young @ 2012-01-30 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Current dracut network only will be setup when netroot is used. But there are
some cases we need network even without netroot. For example kdump will need
copy vmcore to remote machine via scp or nfs mount. OTOH, if we use dracut as
a recovery system the network is helpful even root is not a network device.
This implementation is based on the manually bring up method. Here add a kernel
cmdline argument rd.neednet. If rd.neednet is set dracut will bring up network
with ifup $INTERFACE -m. If netroot is used we still keep original behavior.
Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
dracut.cmdline.7.xml | 8 ++++++++
modules.d/40network/net-genrules.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: dracut/modules.d/40network/net-genrules.sh
===================================================================
--- dracut.orig/modules.d/40network/net-genrules.sh
+++ dracut/modules.d/40network/net-genrules.sh
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ fix_bootif() {
}
# Don't continue if we don't need network
-[ -z "$netroot" ] && return;
+[ -z "$netroot" ] && ! getargbool 0 rd.neednet && return;
# Write udev rules
{
@@ -35,17 +35,29 @@ fix_bootif() {
BOOTIF=$(getarg 'BOOTIF=')
if [ -n "$BOOTIF" ] ; then
BOOTIF=$(fix_bootif "$BOOTIF")
- printf 'ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTR{address}=="%s", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE}"\n' "$BOOTIF"
+ if [ -n "$netroot" ]; then
+ printf 'ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTR{address}=="%s", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE}"\n' "$BOOTIF"
+ else
+ printf 'ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTR{address}=="%s", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE} -m"\n' "$BOOTIF"
+ fi
# If we have to handle multiple interfaces, handle only them.
elif [ -n "$IFACES" ] ; then
for iface in $IFACES ; do
- printf 'SUBSYSTEM=="net", ENV{INTERFACE}=="%s", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE}"\n' "$iface"
+ if [ -n "$netroot" ]; then
+ printf 'SUBSYSTEM=="net", ENV{INTERFACE}=="%s", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE}"\n' "$iface"
+ else
+ printf 'SUBSYSTEM=="net", ENV{INTERFACE}=="%s", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE} -m"\n' "$iface"
+ fi
done
# Default: We don't know the interface to use, handle all
else
- printf 'SUBSYSTEM=="net", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE}"\n'
+ if [ -n "$netroot" ]; then
+ printf 'SUBSYSTEM=="net", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE}"\n'
+ else
+ printf 'SUBSYSTEM=="net", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE} -m"\n'
+ fi
fi
} > /etc/udev/rules.d/60-net.rules
Index: dracut/dracut.cmdline.7.xml
===================================================================
--- dracut.orig/dracut.cmdline.7.xml
+++ dracut/dracut.cmdline.7.xml
@@ -507,6 +507,14 @@ Required if multiple ip= lines are used.
<para>turn on/off biosdevname network interface renaming</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>
+ <envar>rd.neednet=</envar><replaceable><0|1></replaceable>
+ </term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>boolean, bring up network even without netroot set</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</refsect2>
<refsect2>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot
2012-01-30 6:43 [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot Dave Young
@ 2012-01-30 8:33 ` Cong Wang
2012-01-30 8:51 ` Dave Young
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Cong Wang @ 2012-01-30 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 at 06:43 GMT, Dave Young <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Current dracut network only will be setup when netroot is used. But there are
> some cases we need network even without netroot. For example kdump will need
> copy vmcore to remote machine via scp or nfs mount. OTOH, if we use dracut as
> a recovery system the network is helpful even root is not a network device.
>
> This implementation is based on the manually bring up method. Here add a kernel
> cmdline argument rd.neednet. If rd.neednet is set dracut will bring up network
> with ifup $INTERFACE -m. If netroot is used we still keep original behavior.
>
I don't think we really need to introduce a new cmdline, I think we
can re-use ip= cmdline. Currently, if ip= is specified but netroot is
not, ip= will be ignored. We can change this, let dracut bring up
network as long as we have ip=, even we don't have netroot.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot
2012-01-30 8:33 ` Cong Wang
@ 2012-01-30 8:51 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <4F265A0B.1000402-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dave Young @ 2012-01-30 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cong Wang; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On 01/30/2012 04:33 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 at 06:43 GMT, Dave Young <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Current dracut network only will be setup when netroot is used. But there are
>> some cases we need network even without netroot. For example kdump will need
>> copy vmcore to remote machine via scp or nfs mount. OTOH, if we use dracut as
>> a recovery system the network is helpful even root is not a network device.
>>
>> This implementation is based on the manually bring up method. Here add a kernel
>> cmdline argument rd.neednet. If rd.neednet is set dracut will bring up network
>> with ifup $INTERFACE -m. If netroot is used we still keep original behavior.
>>
>
> I don't think we really need to introduce a new cmdline, I think we
> can re-use ip= cmdline. Currently, if ip= is specified but netroot is
> not, ip= will be ignored. We can change this, let dracut bring up
> network as long as we have ip=, even we don't have netroot.
For netroot case it is supported as well for no ip= or other network
cmdline, please see the net-genrules.sh code
We will also setup network when rd.neednet=1 in case no special ip=
provided for convenience.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Thanks
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot
[not found] ` <4F265A0B.1000402-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-01-30 8:51 ` Cong Wang
[not found] ` <4F265A22.2090407-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Cong Wang @ 2012-01-30 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Young; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 04:33 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 at 06:43 GMT, Dave Young<dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> Current dracut network only will be setup when netroot is used. But there are
>>> some cases we need network even without netroot. For example kdump will need
>>> copy vmcore to remote machine via scp or nfs mount. OTOH, if we use dracut as
>>> a recovery system the network is helpful even root is not a network device.
>>>
>>> This implementation is based on the manually bring up method. Here add a kernel
>>> cmdline argument rd.neednet. If rd.neednet is set dracut will bring up network
>>> with ifup $INTERFACE -m. If netroot is used we still keep original behavior.
>>>
>>
>> I don't think we really need to introduce a new cmdline, I think we
>> can re-use ip= cmdline. Currently, if ip= is specified but netroot is
>> not, ip= will be ignored. We can change this, let dracut bring up
>> network as long as we have ip=, even we don't have netroot.
>
>
> For netroot case it is supported as well for no ip= or other network
> cmdline, please see the net-genrules.sh code
Irrelevant.
>
> We will also setup network when rd.neednet=1 in case no special ip=
> provided for convenience.
>
With rd.neednet=1 but without ip=, how can you know which nic we need to
bring up?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot
[not found] ` <4F265A22.2090407-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-01-30 8:59 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <4F265C01.4010701-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dave Young @ 2012-01-30 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cong Wang; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>> On 01/30/2012 04:33 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 at 06:43 GMT, Dave Young<dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>> Current dracut network only will be setup when netroot is used. But
>>>> there are
>>>> some cases we need network even without netroot. For example kdump
>>>> will need
>>>> copy vmcore to remote machine via scp or nfs mount. OTOH, if we use
>>>> dracut as
>>>> a recovery system the network is helpful even root is not a network
>>>> device.
>>>>
>>>> This implementation is based on the manually bring up method. Here
>>>> add a kernel
>>>> cmdline argument rd.neednet. If rd.neednet is set dracut will bring
>>>> up network
>>>> with ifup $INTERFACE -m. If netroot is used we still keep original
>>>> behavior.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think we really need to introduce a new cmdline, I think we
>>> can re-use ip= cmdline. Currently, if ip= is specified but netroot is
>>> not, ip= will be ignored. We can change this, let dracut bring up
>>> network as long as we have ip=, even we don't have netroot.
>>
>>
>> For netroot case it is supported as well for no ip= or other network
>> cmdline, please see the net-genrules.sh code
>
>
> Irrelevant.
>
>>
>> We will also setup network when rd.neednet=1 in case no special ip=
>> provided for convenience.
>>
>
> With rd.neednet=1 but without ip=, how can you know which nic we need to
> bring up?
current behavior of net-genrule.sh is below:
# Default: We don't know the interface to use, handle all
It will be ok and convenient at least when we have only one nic
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Thanks
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot
[not found] ` <4F265C01.4010701-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-01-30 9:03 ` Cong Wang
[not found] ` <4F265CDB.7070204-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Cong Wang @ 2012-01-30 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Young; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On 01/30/2012 04:59 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>
>> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>>>
>>> We will also setup network when rd.neednet=1 in case no special ip=
>>> provided for convenience.
>>>
>>
>> With rd.neednet=1 but without ip=, how can you know which nic we need to
>> bring up?
>
>
> current behavior of net-genrule.sh is below:
>
> # Default: We don't know the interface to use, handle all
>
> It will be ok and convenient at least when we have only one nic
So, rd.neednet=1 will bring up all when there is no ip=, what kdump
needs is a cmdline that tells dracut to bring up only the ones we need.
You still don't tell why re-using ip= doesn't work. So far, I think ip=
can be re-used for kdump case, and is better than your rd.neeednet=1.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot
[not found] ` <4F265CDB.7070204-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-01-30 9:16 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <4F266004.5080501-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dave Young @ 2012-01-30 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cong Wang; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On 01/30/2012 05:03 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 04:59 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We will also setup network when rd.neednet=1 in case no special ip=
>>>> provided for convenience.
>>>>
>>>
>>> With rd.neednet=1 but without ip=, how can you know which nic we need to
>>> bring up?
>>
>>
>> current behavior of net-genrule.sh is below:
>>
>> # Default: We don't know the interface to use, handle all
>>
>> It will be ok and convenient at least when we have only one nic
>
> So, rd.neednet=1 will bring up all when there is no ip=, what kdump
> needs is a cmdline that tells dracut to bring up only the ones we need.
>
> You still don't tell why re-using ip= doesn't work. So far, I think ip=
> can be re-used for kdump case, and is better than your rd.neeednet=1.
How to say...
There's many different configs for network like:
1. ip={dhcp|on|any|dhcp6|auto6|ibft}
2. ip=<interface>:{dhcp|on|any|dhcp6|auto6}
3. ip=<client-IP>:[ <server-id>
]:<gateway-IP>:<netmask>:<client_hostname>:<interface>:{none|off}
4. ifname=
5. bootdev=
6. root=nfs:[snip]
They are all possibly be used, IHMO they are not good options for this
patch using. For example there's no NIC specified in 1 and 3, we will
still have to bring up the default
Also this is a general feature, maybe it will be used by users other
than kdump. For kdump I think we can use proper ip= plus rd.neednet=1
--
Thanks
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot
[not found] ` <4F266004.5080501-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-01-30 9:31 ` Cong Wang
[not found] ` <4F266389.70303-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Cong Wang @ 2012-01-30 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Young; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On 01/30/2012 05:16 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>
> How to say...
> There's many different configs for network like:
> 1. ip={dhcp|on|any|dhcp6|auto6|ibft}
> 2. ip=<interface>:{dhcp|on|any|dhcp6|auto6}
> 3. ip=<client-IP>:[<server-id>
> ]:<gateway-IP>:<netmask>:<client_hostname>:<interface>:{none|off}
> 4. ifname=
> 5. bootdev=
> 6. root=nfs:[snip]
>
> They are all possibly be used, IHMO they are not good options for this
> patch using. For example there's no NIC specified in 1 and 3, we will
> still have to bring up the default
Kdump module can make sure that at least one NIC will be specified, if
there is ip=.
>
> Also this is a general feature, maybe it will be used by users other
> than kdump. For kdump I think we can use proper ip= plus rd.neednet=1
>
Why? If we can re-use ip=, it will imply rd.neednet=1, so again,
rd.neednet is not needed.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot
[not found] ` <4F266389.70303-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-01-30 9:49 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <4F2667A4.4080203-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dave Young @ 2012-01-30 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cong Wang; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On 01/30/2012 05:31 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 05:16 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>>
>> How to say...
>> There's many different configs for network like:
>> 1. ip={dhcp|on|any|dhcp6|auto6|ibft}
>> 2. ip=<interface>:{dhcp|on|any|dhcp6|auto6}
>> 3. ip=<client-IP>:[<server-id>
>> ]:<gateway-IP>:<netmask>:<client_hostname>:<interface>:{none|off}
>> 4. ifname=
>> 5. bootdev=
>> 6. root=nfs:[snip]
>>
>> They are all possibly be used, IHMO they are not good options for this
>> patch using. For example there's no NIC specified in 1 and 3, we will
>> still have to bring up the default
>
>
> Kdump module can make sure that at least one NIC will be specified, if
> there is ip=.
>
>>
>> Also this is a general feature, maybe it will be used by users other
>> than kdump. For kdump I think we can use proper ip= plus rd.neednet=1
>>
>
> Why? If we can re-use ip=, it will imply rd.neednet=1, so again,
> rd.neednet is not needed.
why choose ip=? what if user pass ifname= or bootdev= without ip=? I
want to benefit to other user as well, from semantic point of view one
global switch like rd.neednet is more clear then reuse the various other
options.
--
Thanks
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot
[not found] ` <4F2667A4.4080203-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-01-30 10:03 ` Cong Wang
[not found] ` <4F266AEE.703-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Cong Wang @ 2012-01-30 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Young; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On 01/30/2012 05:49 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 05:31 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>
>> On 01/30/2012 05:16 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>>>
>>> How to say...
>>> There's many different configs for network like:
>>> 1. ip={dhcp|on|any|dhcp6|auto6|ibft}
>>> 2. ip=<interface>:{dhcp|on|any|dhcp6|auto6}
>>> 3. ip=<client-IP>:[<server-id>
>>> ]:<gateway-IP>:<netmask>:<client_hostname>:<interface>:{none|off}
>>> 4. ifname=
>>> 5. bootdev=
>>> 6. root=nfs:[snip]
>>>
>>> They are all possibly be used, IHMO they are not good options for this
>>> patch using. For example there's no NIC specified in 1 and 3, we will
>>> still have to bring up the default
>>
>>
>> Kdump module can make sure that at least one NIC will be specified, if
>> there is ip=.
>>
>>>
>>> Also this is a general feature, maybe it will be used by users other
>>> than kdump. For kdump I think we can use proper ip= plus rd.neednet=1
>>>
>>
>> Why? If we can re-use ip=, it will imply rd.neednet=1, so again,
>> rd.neednet is not needed.
>
>
> why choose ip=? what if user pass ifname= or bootdev= without ip=? I
For kdump, ip= is the one we need, it has the NIC, and dhcp etc,
everything we need to bring up an NIC.
If ifname= or bootdev= is provided but no ip=, we can just bring the NIC
up without assigning any IP address.
> want to benefit to other user as well, from semantic point of view one
> global switch like rd.neednet is more clear then reuse the various other
> options.
I can't agree, only specifying ip= also means bringing up network
apparently.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot
[not found] ` <4F266AEE.703-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
@ 2012-01-31 1:42 ` Dave Young
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dave Young @ 2012-01-31 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cong Wang; +Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Harald Hoyer
On 01/30/2012 06:03 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 05:49 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>> On 01/30/2012 05:31 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/30/2012 05:16 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How to say...
>>>> There's many different configs for network like:
>>>> 1. ip={dhcp|on|any|dhcp6|auto6|ibft}
>>>> 2. ip=<interface>:{dhcp|on|any|dhcp6|auto6}
>>>> 3. ip=<client-IP>:[<server-id>
>>>> ]:<gateway-IP>:<netmask>:<client_hostname>:<interface>:{none|off}
>>>> 4. ifname=
>>>> 5. bootdev=
>>>> 6. root=nfs:[snip]
>>>>
>>>> They are all possibly be used, IHMO they are not good options for this
>>>> patch using. For example there's no NIC specified in 1 and 3, we will
>>>> still have to bring up the default
>>>
>>>
>>> Kdump module can make sure that at least one NIC will be specified, if
>>> there is ip=.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also this is a general feature, maybe it will be used by users other
>>>> than kdump. For kdump I think we can use proper ip= plus rd.neednet=1
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why? If we can re-use ip=, it will imply rd.neednet=1, so again,
>>> rd.neednet is not needed.
>>
>>
>> why choose ip=? what if user pass ifname= or bootdev= without ip=? I
>
> For kdump, ip= is the one we need, it has the NIC, and dhcp etc,
> everything we need to bring up an NIC.
>
> If ifname= or bootdev= is provided but no ip=, we can just bring the NIC
> up without assigning any IP address.
>
>> want to benefit to other user as well, from semantic point of view one
>> global switch like rd.neednet is more clear then reuse the various other
>> options.
>
> I can't agree, only specifying ip= also means bringing up network
> apparently.
Harald, what's your opnion? especially about the previous patch to allow
manually bring up network with like 'ifup eth0 -m'? Can you give comments?
--
Thanks
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-31 1:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-30 6:43 [PATCH] auto setup network without netroot Dave Young
2012-01-30 8:33 ` Cong Wang
2012-01-30 8:51 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <4F265A0B.1000402-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-30 8:51 ` Cong Wang
[not found] ` <4F265A22.2090407-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-30 8:59 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <4F265C01.4010701-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-30 9:03 ` Cong Wang
[not found] ` <4F265CDB.7070204-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-30 9:16 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <4F266004.5080501-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-30 9:31 ` Cong Wang
[not found] ` <4F266389.70303-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-30 9:49 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <4F2667A4.4080203-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-30 10:03 ` Cong Wang
[not found] ` <4F266AEE.703-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-31 1:42 ` Dave Young
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox