From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/selftest: Bump up sample period for busy stats selftest
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:16:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01a58f9d-2c9f-1e7c-344b-989ec429a0df@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221105003235.1717908-3-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
On 05/11/2022 00:32, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> Engine busyness samples around a 10ms period is failing with busyness
> ranging approx. from 87% to 115%. The expected range is +/- 5% of the
> sample period.
>
> When determining busyness of active engine, the GuC based engine
> busyness implementation relies on a 64 bit timestamp register read. The
> latency incurred by this register read causes the failure.
>
> On DG1, when the test fails, the observed latencies range from 900us -
> 1.5ms.
Is it at all faster with the locked 2x32 or still the same unexplained
display related latencies can happen?
> One solution tried was to reduce the latency between reg read and
> CPU timestamp capture, but such optimization does not add value to user
> since the CPU timestamp obtained here is only used for (1) selftest and
> (2) i915 rps implementation specific to execlist scheduler. Also, this
> solution only reduces the frequency of failure and does not eliminate
> it.
>
> In order to make the selftest more robust and account for such
> latencies, increase the sample period to 100 ms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c
> index 0dcb3ed44a73..87c94314cf67 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c
> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static int live_engine_busy_stats(void *arg)
> ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "measuring busy time\n");
> preempt_disable();
> de = intel_engine_get_busy_time(engine, &t[0]);
> - mdelay(10);
> + mdelay(100);
> de = ktime_sub(intel_engine_get_busy_time(engine, &t[1]), de);
> preempt_enable();
> dt = ktime_sub(t[1], t[0]);
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-05 0:32 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Fix live busy stats selftest failure Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-11-05 0:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] i915/uncore: Acquire fw before loop in intel_uncore_read64_2x32 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-11-07 10:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-11-07 21:23 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-11-08 0:11 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-11-08 0:45 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-11-08 10:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-11-05 0:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/selftest: Bump up sample period for busy stats selftest Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-11-07 10:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2022-11-07 19:01 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-11-07 23:33 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-11-05 0:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Fix live busy stats selftest failure Patchwork
2022-11-05 1:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-05 13:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01a58f9d-2c9f-1e7c-344b-989ec429a0df@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox