public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
To: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, tomas.winkler@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/6] drm/i915/hdcp: update current transcoder into intel_hdcp
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 10:49:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <06699d46-6da4-342e-fbbf-c9a7a3db28c4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190822151904.17919-6-ramalingam.c@intel.com>

Regards

Shashank

On 8/22/2019 8:49 PM, Ramalingam C wrote:
> On gen12+ platforms, HDCP HW is associated to the transcoder.
> Hence on every modeset update associated transcoder into the
> intel_hdcp of the port.
>
> v2:
>    s/trans/cpu_transcoder [Jani]
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>   .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  7 +++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c       |  3 ++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c     | 49 ++++++++++++++++++-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h     |  3 ++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c     |  3 ++
>   5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index 449abaea619f..fc85b3e284d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -388,6 +388,13 @@ struct intel_hdcp {
>   	wait_queue_head_t cp_irq_queue;
>   	atomic_t cp_irq_count;
>   	int cp_irq_count_cached;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * HDCP register access for gen12+ need the transcoder associated.
> +	 * Transcoder attached to the connector could be changed at modeset.
> +	 * Hence caching the transcoder here.
> +	 */
> +	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder;
attached_transcoder to be inline with MEI counterpart of the code ?
>   };
>   
>   struct intel_connector {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 921ad0a2f7ba..ba5317d56da7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -2244,6 +2244,9 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>   
>   	intel_psr_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config);
>   
> +	intel_hdcp_transcoder_config(intel_connector,
> +				     pipe_config->cpu_transcoder);
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> index 534832f435dc..1e5548833e8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> @@ -1762,13 +1762,60 @@ enum mei_fw_ddi intel_get_mei_fw_ddi_index(enum port port)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static inline
> +enum mei_fw_tc intel_get_mei_fw_tc(enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
> +{
> +	switch (cpu_transcoder) {
> +	case TRANSCODER_A ... TRANSCODER_D:
> +		return (enum mei_fw_tc)(cpu_transcoder | 0x10);
Again, as this is in context of HDCP, we should not entertain 
transcoders below. Or we should move this function in a more generic 
file like intel_display.c or intel_ddi.c
> +	case TRANSCODER_EDP:
> +		return MEI_TC_EDP;
> +	case TRANSCODER_DSI_0:
> +		return MEI_TC_DSI0;
> +	case TRANSCODER_DSI_1:
> +		return MEI_TC_DSI1;
> +	default:
> +		return MEI_INVALID_TRANSCODER;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void intel_hdcp_transcoder_config(struct intel_connector *connector,
> +				  enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
> +	struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
> +
> +	if (!hdcp->shim)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
Ah, so this is the gen_check which I was talking about in previous patch :-)
> +		mutex_lock(&hdcp->mutex);
> +		hdcp->cpu_transcoder = cpu_transcoder;
> +		hdcp->port_data.fw_tc = intel_get_mei_fw_tc(cpu_transcoder);
> +		mutex_unlock(&hdcp->mutex);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   static inline int initialize_hdcp_port_data(struct intel_connector *connector,
>   					    const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim)
>   {
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
>   	struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
>   	struct hdcp_port_data *data = &hdcp->port_data;
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> +
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 12) {
> +		data->fw_ddi =
> +			intel_get_mei_fw_ddi_index(connector->encoder->port);
> +	} else {
> +		crtc = to_intel_crtc(connector->base.state->crtc);
> +		if (crtc) {
> +			hdcp->cpu_transcoder = crtc->config->cpu_transcoder;
> +			data->fw_tc = intel_get_mei_fw_tc(hdcp->cpu_transcoder);
> +		}
> +		data->fw_ddi = intel_get_mei_fw_ddi_index(PORT_NONE);

I dint understand this, why PORT_NONE ?

- Shashank

> +	}
>   
> -	data->fw_ddi = intel_get_mei_fw_ddi_index(connector->encoder->port);
>   	data->port_type = (u8)HDCP_PORT_TYPE_INTEGRATED;
>   	data->protocol = (u8)shim->protocol;
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
> index 59a2b40405cc..41c1053d9e38 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
> @@ -16,10 +16,13 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
>   struct intel_connector;
>   struct intel_hdcp_shim;
>   enum port;
> +enum transcoder;
>   
>   void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
>   			     struct drm_connector_state *old_state,
>   			     struct drm_connector_state *new_state);
> +void intel_hdcp_transcoder_config(struct intel_connector *connector,
> +				  enum transcoder cpu_transcoder);
>   int intel_hdcp_init(struct intel_connector *connector,
>   		    const struct intel_hdcp_shim *hdcp_shim);
>   int intel_hdcp_enable(struct intel_connector *connector, u8 content_type);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
> index e02f0faecf02..6e9bb6bd1ee2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
> @@ -2431,6 +2431,9 @@ int intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
> +	intel_hdcp_transcoder_config(intel_hdmi->attached_connector,
> +				     pipe_config->cpu_transcoder);
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-27  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-22 15:18 [PATCH v9 0/6] drm/i915: Enable HDCP 1.4 and 2.2 on Gen12+ Ramalingam C
2019-08-22 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] drm/i915: mei_hdcp: I915 sends ddi index as per ME FW Ramalingam C
2019-08-27  4:24   ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-08-27  4:33     ` Ramalingam C
2019-08-27  4:43       ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] drm: Move port definition back to i915 header Ramalingam C
2019-08-27  4:39   ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] drm: Extend I915 mei interface for transcoder info Ramalingam C
2019-08-27  4:48   ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-08-27  5:19     ` Ramalingam C
2019-08-27  5:06   ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-08-27  5:21     ` Ramalingam C
2019-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] misc/mei/hdcp: Fill transcoder index in port info Ramalingam C
2019-08-27  5:12   ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-08-27  5:17     ` Ramalingam C
2019-08-27  5:21       ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] drm/i915/hdcp: update current transcoder into intel_hdcp Ramalingam C
2019-08-27  5:19   ` Sharma, Shashank [this message]
2019-08-27  5:27     ` Ramalingam C
2019-08-27  5:33       ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] drm/i915/hdcp: Enable HDCP 1.4 and 2.2 on Gen12+ Ramalingam C
2019-08-27 10:01   ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-08-22 16:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Enable HDCP 1.4 and 2.2 on Gen12+ (rev7) Patchwork
2019-08-23 10:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=06699d46-6da4-342e-fbbf-c9a7a3db28c4@intel.com \
    --to=shashank.sharma@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox