From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
Mastan Katragadda <mastanx.katragadda@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [v2] drm/i915/gem: missing boundary check in vm_access leads to OOB read/write
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 10:43:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b84c114-35a1-3a0b-1ef5-80cdb79f1f92@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1715f90c-6790-cbd7-9e8f-ac371d61b5dd@linux.intel.com>
On 03/03/2022 09:00, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> + Matt
>
> On 03/03/2022 06:04, Mastan Katragadda wrote:
>> Intel ID: PSIRT-PTK0002429
>>
>> A missing bounds check in vm_access()can lead to an out-of-bounds read or
>> write in the adjacent memory area.The len attribute is not validated
>> before
>> the memcpy at [1]or [2] occurs.
>
> s/[1]or [2]/later in the function/ ?
>
>>
>> [ 183.637831] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address:
>> ffffc90000c86000
>> [ 183.637934] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>> [ 183.637997] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>> [ 183.638059] PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 100258067 PMD 106341067
>> PTE 0
>> [ 183.638144] Oops: 0000 [#2] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
>> [ 183.638201] CPU: 3 PID: 1790 Comm: poc Tainted: G D
>> 5.17.0-rc6-ci-drm-11296+ #1
>> [ 183.638298] Hardware name: Intel Corporation CoffeeLake Client
>> Platform/CoffeeLake H DDR4 RVP, BIOS CNLSFWR1.R00.X208.B00.1905301319
>> 05/30/2019
>> [ 183.638430] RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0x6/0x10
>> [ 183.640213] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001763d48 EFLAGS: 00010246
>> [ 183.641117] RAX: ffff888109c14000 RBX: ffff888111bece40 RCX:
>> 0000000000000ffc
>> [ 183.642029] RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: ffffc90000c86000 RDI:
>> ffff888109c14004
>> [ 183.642946] RBP: 0000000000000ffc R08: 800000000000016b R09:
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 183.643848] R10: ffffc90000c85000 R11: 0000000000000048 R12:
>> 0000000000001000
>> [ 183.644742] R13: ffff888111bed190 R14: ffff888109c14000 R15:
>> 0000000000001000
>> [ 183.645653] FS: 00007fe5ef807540(0000) GS:ffff88845b380000(0000)
>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [ 183.646570] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> [ 183.647481] CR2: ffffc90000c86000 CR3: 000000010ff02006 CR4:
>> 00000000003706e0
>> [ 183.648384] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 183.649271] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:
>> 0000000000000400
>> [ 183.650142] Call Trace:
>> [ 183.650988] <TASK>
>> [ 183.651793] vm_access+0x1f0/0x2a0 [i915]
>> [ 183.652726] __access_remote_vm+0x224/0x380
>> [ 183.653561] mem_rw.isra.0+0xf9/0x190
>> [ 183.654402] vfs_read+0x9d/0x1b0
>> [ 183.655238] ksys_read+0x63/0xe0
>> [ 183.656065] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xc0
>> [ 183.656882] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>> [ 183.657663] RIP: 0033:0x7fe5ef725142
>> [ 183.659351] RSP: 002b:00007ffe1e81c7e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 183.660227] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000557055dfb780 RCX:
>> 00007fe5ef725142
>> [ 183.661104] RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 00007ffe1e81d880 RDI:
>> 0000000000000005
>> [ 183.661972] RBP: 00007ffe1e81e890 R08: 0000000000000030 R09:
>> 0000000000000046
>> [ 183.662832] R10: 0000557055dfc2e0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
>> 0000557055dfb1c0
>> [ 183.663691] R13: 00007ffe1e81e980 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 183.664566] </TASK>
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Updated if condition with range_overflows_t [Chris Wilson]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mastan Katragadda <mastanx.katragadda@intel.com>
>> Suggested-by: Adam Zabrocki <adamza@microsoft.com>
>> Reported-by: Jackson Cody <cody.jackson@intel.com>
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Bloomfield Jon <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
>> Cc: Dutt Sudeep <sudeep.dutt@intel.com>
>
> Fixes: 9f909e215fea ("drm/i915: Implement vm_ops->access for gdb access
> into mmaps")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.8+
>
> Right?
>
> There was a selftest added with the referenced patch and it sounds like
> it would be a good idea to extend it to cover this scenario. As a
> separate patch though so this one is easy to backport.
Agreed, a simple regression test(either selftest or igt) for this would
be nice, if possible.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
>> index efe69d6b86f4..c3ea243d414d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
>> @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ vm_access(struct vm_area_struct *area, unsigned
>> long addr,
>> return -EACCES;
>> addr -= area->vm_start;
>> - if (addr >= obj->base.size)
>> + if (range_overflows_t(u64, addr, len, obj->base.size))
>> return -EINVAL;
Other users like ttm_bo_vm_access are also checking if len <= 0, should
we also add an explicit check for that here? Otherwise LGTM.
>> i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-03 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 6:04 [Intel-gfx] [v2] drm/i915/gem: missing boundary check in vm_access leads to OOB read/write Mastan Katragadda
2022-03-03 6:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/gem: missing boundary check in vm_access leads to OOB read/write (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-10 9:20 ` Matthew Auld
2022-03-10 16:33 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2022-03-03 9:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [v2] drm/i915/gem: missing boundary check in vm_access leads to OOB read/write Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-03-03 10:43 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2022-03-04 4:07 ` Katragadda, MastanX
2022-03-09 1:46 ` Katragadda, MastanX
2022-03-09 11:19 ` Katragadda, MastanX
2022-03-09 11:45 ` Matthew Auld
2022-03-11 10:37 ` Matthew Auld
2022-03-03 9:33 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-10 15:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/gem: missing boundary check in vm_access leads to OOB read/write (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-10 15:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-10 18:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b84c114-35a1-3a0b-1ef5-80cdb79f1f92@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mastanx.katragadda@intel.com \
--cc=tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox