From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not disable preemption for resets
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 12:54:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c852a65-6f8a-1d28-390e-88d2232b90cd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD235PRj3PzMwfwL6zaFko__XjQctKyMZAAXEmf_0==n_nCGpQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 13/09/2023 18:04, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 18:48, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 2023-07-05 10:30:25 [+0100], Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Commit ade8a0f59844 ("drm/i915: Make all GPU resets atomic") added a
>>> preempt disable section over the hardware reset callback to prepare the
>>> driver for being able to reset from atomic contexts.
>> …
>>
>> This missed the v6.6 merge window. Has this been dropped for some reason
>> or just missed by chance? Can this be still applied, please?
>>
>
> Just an FYI, but I happened to be looking at an internal bug report
> for exactly this
> error site, so +1 here :)
It looks I failed to collect an r-b before the summer break and so it
fell off my radar. Definitely want to merge it so I will try again.
Regards,
Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-20 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 9:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not disable preemption for resets Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-05 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2023-07-05 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-07-05 17:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-07-26 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-13 8:08 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-13 17:04 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-09-20 11:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2023-09-20 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Do not disable preemption for resets (rev2) Patchwork
2023-09-20 15:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-25 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Do not disable preemption for resets (rev3) Patchwork
2023-09-25 22:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-09-26 4:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-26 9:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not disable preemption for resets Andi Shyti
2023-09-26 10:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c852a65-6f8a-1d28-390e-88d2232b90cd@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox