From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix IOMMU field not populated on device hot re-plug
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:43:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0cf4e930-1132-1e7f-815b-57a08a1fe5de@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3275480.HMaYE7B3nd@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi Janusz,
On 8/28/19 10:17 PM, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
>> We should avoid kernel panic when a intel_unmap() is called against
>> a non-existent domain.
> Does that mean you suggest to replace
> BUG_ON(!domain);
> with something like
> if (WARN_ON(!domain))
> return;
> and to not care of orphaned mappings left allocated? Is there a way to inform
> users that their active DMA mappings are no longer valid and they shouldn't
> call dma_unmap_*()?
>
>> But we shouldn't expect the IOMMU driver not
>> cleaning up the domain info when a device remove notification comes and
>> wait until all file descriptors being closed, right?
> Shouldn't then the IOMMU driver take care of cleaning up resources still
> allocated on device remove before it invalidates and forgets their pointers?
>
You are right. We need to wait until all allocated resources (iova and
mappings) to be released.
How about registering a callback for BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER, and
removing the domain info when the driver detachment completes?
> Thanks,
> Janusz
Best regards,
Baolu
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-29 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-22 14:29 [RFC PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix IOMMU field not populated on device hot re-plug Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-08-22 15:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2019-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH] " Lu Baolu
2019-08-26 8:15 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-08-26 8:29 ` Lu Baolu
[not found] ` <790a4a20-7517-fe54-177d-850b9beeb88e-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2019-08-27 9:35 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-08-28 0:56 ` Lu Baolu
2019-08-28 14:17 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-08-29 1:43 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2019-08-29 7:58 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-08-29 9:08 ` Lu Baolu
2019-09-02 8:37 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-09-03 1:29 ` Lu Baolu
2019-09-03 7:41 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-10-01 15:01 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
[not found] ` <7739498.9tyZrNxj5X-RCb3PieevP79BXuAQUXR0fooFf0ArEBIu+b9c/7xato@public.gmane.org>
2019-10-08 2:27 ` Lu Baolu
2019-10-11 6:54 ` Lu Baolu
2019-10-11 10:27 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-08-23 8:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0cf4e930-1132-1e7f-815b-57a08a1fe5de@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox