From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: no more agp for gem
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:20:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d30dc$k3nai0@orsmga001.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289053328-9874-16-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Woohoo, we kill agp_memory. I'm in favour!
Do we need to keep the sg_table around, or can we just temporary allocate
it?
This fits nicely into my plans, i915_gem_gtt.c has been a candidate to
eliminate a few of the more expensive agp routines. Thanks, I'll look more
closely at the series next week and see if there are any immediate issues.
Do we have any other big items on the horizon? [The big one that I'm
trying to shape up at the moment is a custom address_space for GEM with a
wc-cache to eliminate the major overhead incurred with shmfs that currently
necessitates the userspace bo cache.] I'd like to finish making the merges
for -next in the next couple of weeks and focus on ensuring we've
identified (and preferably fixed) all regressions before handing it over
to Dave.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-06 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-06 14:21 [PATCH 00/15] The "no more agp" series Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:21 ` [PATCH 01/15] intel-gtt: drop dcache support for i830 and later Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:21 ` [PATCH 02/15] intel-gtt: kill unneeded sandybridge memory types Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:21 ` [PATCH 03/15] intel-gtt: switch i81x to the write_entry helpers Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:21 ` [PATCH 04/15] intel-gtt: switch i81x to the common initialization helpers Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:21 ` [PATCH 05/15] intel-gtt: fold i81x-only dcache support into the generic driver Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:21 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915|intel-gtt: consolidate intel-gtt.h headers Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915/gtt: call chipset flush directly Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm: kill drm_agp_chipset_flush Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 09/15] agp: kill agp_flush_chipset and corresponding ioctl Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915: track objects in the gtt Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: restore gtt on resume in the drm instead of in intel-gtt.ko Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 12/15] agp: kill agp_rebind_memory Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915: move gtt handling to i915_gem_gtt.c Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 14/15] intel-gtt: export api for drm/i915 Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: no more agp for gem Daniel Vetter
2010-11-06 22:20 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2010-11-07 10:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2010-11-07 10:55 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='0d30dc$k3nai0@orsmga001.jf.intel.com' \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox