From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Replace intel_engine_transfer_stale_breadcrumbs
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:37:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0debaba5-b70e-913f-21a8-2e01cbf0ae29@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159497425828.27598.4204263809628931202@build.alporthouse.com>
On 17/07/2020 09:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-07-17 09:13:21)
>>
>> On 16/07/2020 18:28, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> @@ -341,8 +325,10 @@ static void insert_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq,
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> list_add(&rq->signal_link, pos);
>>> - if (pos == &ce->signals) /* catch transitions from empty list */
>>> + if (pos == &ce->signals) { /* catch transitions from empty list */
>>> list_move_tail(&ce->signal_link, &b->signalers);
>>> + irq_work_queue(&b->irq_work); /* check after enabling irq */
>>> + }
>>> GEM_BUG_ON(!check_signal_order(ce, rq));
>>>
>>> set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL, &rq->fence.flags);
>>> @@ -401,7 +387,7 @@ bool i915_request_enable_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq)
>>>
>>> spin_unlock(&b->irq_lock);
>>>
>>> - return !__request_completed(rq);
>>> + return true;
>>
>> Maybe my in head diff apply is failing me, but I think there isn't a
>> "return false" path left so could be made a return void function.
>
> There is no return false path anymore (since we always queue the worker
> which should run immediately after dma_fence_enable_signaling if
> necessary, that seemed to be more sensible than conditionally using the
> worker, I also looked at splitting enable_breadcrumb and
> activate_breadcrumb, but the two paths are more similar than not), I
> kept it bool so that it matched i915_fence_enable_signaling.
It's a bit questionable, in this case it would probably be better to
have explicit "return true" in i915_fence_enable_signaling. But it is a
minor point anyway and bugfix trumps it.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-17 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-16 11:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Be wary of data races when reading the active execlists Chris Wilson
2020-07-16 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Remove i915_request.lock requirement for execution callbacks Chris Wilson
2020-07-16 12:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-16 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Remove requirement for holding i915_request.lock for breadcrumbs Chris Wilson
2020-07-16 15:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-16 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/gt: Drop intel_engine_transfer_stale_breadcrumbs Chris Wilson
2020-07-16 15:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-16 15:53 ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-16 17:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Replace intel_engine_transfer_stale_breadcrumbs Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 8:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-17 8:24 ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 8:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2020-07-16 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/gt: Only transfer the virtual context to the new engine if active Chris Wilson
2020-07-16 15:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-16 17:28 ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-16 12:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Be wary of data races when reading the active execlists Patchwork
2020-07-16 12:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-07-16 13:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-07-16 17:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-07-16 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Be wary of data races when reading the active execlists (rev2) Patchwork
2020-07-16 18:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-07-16 19:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-07-16 23:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0debaba5-b70e-913f-21a8-2e01cbf0ae29@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox