From: "Gupta, Anshuman" <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: "Tangudu, Tilak" <tilak.tangudu@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Ewins, Jon" <jon.ewins@intel.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
"Wilson, Chris P" <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>,
"Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
"Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
"Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"Gupta, saurabhg" <saurabhg.gupta@intel.com>,
"Iddamsetty, Aravind" <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>,
"Sundaresan, Sujaritha" <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Added is_intel_rpm_allowed helper
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 14:16:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f1834aa89ed4f6b89db4ee7eacdbd55@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220621123516.370479-5-tilak.tangudu@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tangudu, Tilak <tilak.tangudu@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 6:05 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Ewins, Jon <jon.ewins@intel.com>; Vivi,
> Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>; Belgaumkar, Vinay
> <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>; Wilson, Chris P <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>;
> Dixit, Ashutosh <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>; Nilawar, Badal
> <badal.nilawar@intel.com>; Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>;
> Tangudu, Tilak <tilak.tangudu@intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D
> <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>; Gupta, saurabhg <saurabhg.gupta@intel.com>;
> Iddamsetty, Aravind <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>; Sundaresan, Sujaritha
> <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Added is_intel_rpm_allowed helper
>
> Added is_intel_rpm_allowed function to query the runtime_pm status and
> disllow during suspending and resuming.
This seems a hack,
Not sure if we have better way to handle it.
May be check this in intel_pm_runtime_{get,put} to keep entire code simple ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Tilak Tangudu <tilak.tangudu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 6ed5786bcd29..3759a8596084 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -320,6 +320,21 @@ untrack_all_intel_runtime_pm_wakerefs(struct
> intel_runtime_pm *rpm) }
>
> #endif
> +static int intel_runtime_pm_status(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) {
> + return rpm->kdev->power.runtime_status; }
This is racy in principal, we need a kdev->power lock here.
Regards,
Anshuman Gupta.
> +
> +bool is_intel_rpm_allowed(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) {
> + int rpm_status;
> +
> + rpm_status = intel_runtime_pm_status(rpm);
> + if (rpm_status == RPM_RESUMING || rpm_status ==
> RPM_SUSPENDING)
> + return false;
> + else
> + return true;
> +}
>
> static void
> intel_runtime_pm_acquire(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, bool wakelock) diff --
> git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> index d9160e3ff4af..99418c3a934a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> @@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_init_early(struct
> intel_runtime_pm *rpm); void intel_runtime_pm_enable(struct
> intel_runtime_pm *rpm); void intel_runtime_pm_disable(struct
> intel_runtime_pm *rpm); void intel_runtime_pm_driver_release(struct
> intel_runtime_pm *rpm);
> +bool is_intel_rpm_allowed(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm);
>
> intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm);
> intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use(struct intel_runtime_pm
> *rpm);
> --
> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-21 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-21 12:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] drm/i915: Add D3Cold-Off support for runtime-pm Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-21 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Avoid rpm helpers in intel_guc_global_policies_update Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-21 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Avoid rpm helpers in intel_guc_slpc_set_media_ratio_mode Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-21 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Avoid rpm helpers in intel_gt_suspend_late Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-21 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Added is_intel_rpm_allowed helper Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-21 14:16 ` Gupta, Anshuman [this message]
2022-06-21 14:22 ` Tangudu, Tilak
2022-06-22 12:55 ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-22 20:40 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-06-23 17:21 ` Tangudu, Tilak
2022-06-23 17:49 ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-21 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Guard rpm helpers in gt helpers functions Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-22 12:52 ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-21 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Avoid rpm helpers in try_context_registration Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-21 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Guard rc6 helpers with is_intel_rpm_allowed Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-21 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Guard rpm helpers in rpm_get/put Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-21 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Add i915_save/load_pci_state helpers Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-21 16:30 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-21 19:44 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-21 22:57 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-22 8:35 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-21 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Guard rpm helpers at gt_park/unpark Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-21 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915 : Add D3COLD OFF support Tilak Tangudu
2022-06-21 13:15 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-06-21 13:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Add D3Cold-Off support for runtime-pm Patchwork
2022-06-23 17:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Add D3Cold-Off support for runtime-pm (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f1834aa89ed4f6b89db4ee7eacdbd55@intel.com \
--to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jon.ewins@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com \
--cc=tilak.tangudu@intel.com \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox