Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Clifton <peter.clifton@clifton-electronics.co.uk>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: reinstate GM45 TV detection fix
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:03:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1332846209.25017.6.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABVU7+s8PvQOfqad=49E-T_qGxm63Es5h2vL0sagA96w26HNLA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 15:57 -0300, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> The GM45 with tv-out is so rare machine that I never found one to test
> if this really cause regression and complete disable tv-out on gm45 so
> I'm in favor of apply this and when we find some one with gm45
> complaining about the tv-out not working we will be able to
> test/revert and find another fix for it. Meanwhile:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>

Tested-by: Peter Clifton <Peter.Clifton@clifton-electronics.com>

I've been carrying that patch around in my own builds for my GM45 for
what feels like forever now (since before it was reverted... I helped
identify the requirement, by trial and error in the first place!).


For further details, you might like to contact the guy at Intel who
wrote the commit: ykzhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>


>From some correspondence we had...

(Zhau)

> > > Yes. This is not consistent with the description on PRM. 
> > > But this is required on Cantiga platform to make the TV detection
> > > reliable.
> > 
> > Thanks Zhau,

(Me)

> > Hopefully we'll be able to get the patch re-committed to the
> kernel. 
> > 
> > Since the main issue with the patch was comments as to why this is a
> > good thing to do on GM45, would you be willing to create a new patch
> > with some code-comments (and commit message) explaining the source
> of
> > the correction?
> > 
> > (Are there any comments from the BIOS code as to why these registers
> > need to be programmed in a particular way?)

(Zhau)

> Sorry that there is no comment in BIOS code. BIOS team only tells me
> to follow the BIOS code but there is no explanation about the reason.


(Me)

> > If you like, I could take your original patch and try to add some
> > comments along the lines of what you just explained, then re-send it
> > to intel-gfx for review.

Oops... I never got around to this.

I'd love to see it fixed though, but am too busy to chase it myself now.

Kind regards,

-- 
Peter Clifton <peter.clifton@clifton-electronics.co.uk>

Clifton Electronics

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-27 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-25 20:56 [PATCH] drm/i915: reinstate GM45 TV detection fix Daniel Vetter
2012-03-26 18:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2012-03-27 11:03   ` Peter Clifton [this message]
2012-03-27 11:14     ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1332846209.25017.6.camel@localhost \
    --to=peter.clifton@clifton-electronics.co.uk \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox