From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Inifite timeout for wait ioctl
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:24:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338935065-21477-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> (raw)
Change the ns_timeout parameter of the wait ioctl to a signed value.
Doing this allows the kernel to provide an infinite wait when a timeout
of less than 0 is provided. This mimics select/poll.
Initially the parameter was meant to match up with the GL spec 1:1, but
after being made aware of how much 2^64 - 1 nanoseconds actually is, I
do not think anyone will ever notice the loss of 1 bit.
The infinite timeout on waiting is similar to the existing i915
userspace interface with the exception that struct_mutex is dropped
while doing the wait in this ioctl.
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
include/drm/i915_drm.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 3bc918c..b2eacde 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2026,11 +2026,14 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
struct drm_i915_gem_wait *args = data;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
struct intel_ring_buffer *ring = NULL;
- struct timespec timeout;
+ struct timespec timeout_stack, *timeout = NULL;
u32 seqno = 0;
int ret = 0;
- timeout = ns_to_timespec(args->timeout_ns);
+ if (args->timeout_ns >= 0) {
+ timeout_stack = ns_to_timespec(args->timeout_ns);
+ timeout = &timeout_stack;
+ }
ret = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
if (ret)
@@ -2073,9 +2076,11 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- ret = __wait_seqno(ring, seqno, true, &timeout);
- WARN_ON(!timespec_valid(&timeout));
- args->timeout_ns = timespec_to_ns(&timeout);
+ ret = __wait_seqno(ring, seqno, true, timeout);
+ if (timeout) {
+ WARN_ON(!timespec_valid(timeout));
+ args->timeout_ns = timespec_to_ns(timeout);
+ }
return ret;
out:
diff --git a/include/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/drm/i915_drm.h
index bab1743..aae346e 100644
--- a/include/drm/i915_drm.h
+++ b/include/drm/i915_drm.h
@@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_wait {
__u32 bo_handle;
__u32 flags;
/** Number of nanoseconds to wait, Returns time remaining. */
- __u64 timeout_ns;
+ __s64 timeout_ns;
};
#endif /* _I915_DRM_H_ */
--
1.7.10.3
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-05 22:24 Ben Widawsky [this message]
2012-06-05 22:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add wait render timeout get param Ben Widawsky
2012-06-06 9:51 ` Chris Wilson
2012-06-06 10:29 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338935065-21477-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox