public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: properly wait for SBI status
Date: Fri,  8 Jun 2012 16:43:19 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339184599-32349-1-git-send-email-eugeni.dodonov@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120608143000.GA8088@elgon.mountain>

Somehow this went unnoticed in the past reviews, but the condition would
never timeout properly.

This was initially introduced in the v2 of original SBI enabling patch.
Highly embarrassing.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index ebea71d..c59af67 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ intel_sbi_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg, u32 value)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
-	if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & SBI_READY) == 0,
+	if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & SBI_BUSY) == 0,
 				100)) {
 		DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to become ready\n");
 		goto out_unlock;
@@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ intel_sbi_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg, u32 value)
 			SBI_BUSY |
 			SBI_CTL_OP_CRWR);
 
-	if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & (SBI_READY | SBI_RESPONSE_SUCCESS)) == 0,
+	if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & (SBI_BUSY | SBI_RESPONSE_FAIL)) == 0,
 				100)) {
 		DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to complete write transaction\n");
 		goto out_unlock;
@@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@ intel_sbi_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg)
 	u32 value;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
-	if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & SBI_READY) == 0,
+	if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & SBI_BUSY) == 0,
 				100)) {
 		DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to become ready\n");
 		goto out_unlock;
@@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ intel_sbi_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg)
 			SBI_BUSY |
 			SBI_CTL_OP_CRRD);
 
-	if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & (SBI_READY | SBI_RESPONSE_SUCCESS)) == 0,
+	if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & (SBI_BUSY | SBI_RESPONSE_FAIL)) == 0,
 				100)) {
 		DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to complete read transaction\n");
 		goto out_unlock;
-- 
1.7.10.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-08 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20120608143000.GA8088@elgon.mountain>
2012-06-08 19:38 ` [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: properly wait for SBI status Eugeni Dodonov
2012-06-08 19:43 ` Eugeni Dodonov [this message]
2012-06-08 20:38   ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1339184599-32349-1-git-send-email-eugeni.dodonov@intel.com \
    --to=eugeni.dodonov@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox