From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: don't return a spurious -EIO from intel_ring_begin
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:06:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340658438_69856@CP5-2952> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120625204903.GG4708@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:49:03 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:32:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > It looks like the patch to reuse check_wedge() should be first as it is
> > the common theme in the series.
>
> Hm, actually I think I'll smash the check_wedge into the last patch. With
> that change, this patch would solely be about not returning spurious -EIO,
> whereas the last patch would be solely about not returning -EAGAIN in
> cases we can't handle. Does that make some sense?
The split sounds reasonable, grouping the patch in that manner should
give a better story. My only holdout is that I don't want to lose the
papering in i915_reset().
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-24 14:42 [PATCH 0/5] gpu reset improvements Daniel Vetter
2012-06-24 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: wrap up gt powersave enabling functions Daniel Vetter
2012-06-24 23:03 ` Eugeni Dodonov
2012-06-25 7:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-29 18:51 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-06-29 21:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-24 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: make enable/disable_gt_powersave locking consistent Daniel Vetter
2012-06-24 23:03 ` Eugeni Dodonov
2012-06-25 19:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-24 14:42 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: don't return a spurious -EIO from intel_ring_begin Daniel Vetter
2012-06-25 20:32 ` Chris Wilson
2012-06-25 20:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-25 21:06 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2012-06-25 21:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-25 22:52 ` Chris Wilson
2012-06-25 23:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-26 9:30 ` Chris Wilson
2012-06-24 14:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: don't trylock in the gpu reset code Daniel Vetter
2012-06-25 20:10 ` Chris Wilson
2012-06-24 14:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: non-interruptible sleeps can't handle -EGAIN Daniel Vetter
2012-06-25 20:23 ` Chris Wilson
2012-06-25 20:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-25 20:24 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1340658438_69856@CP5-2952 \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox