From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: rip out pre-production ilk cpu edp w/a
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:59:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354201179-14975-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354201179-14975-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
While reading docs I've noticed that this special workaround to select
the 1.6 GHz DP clock only applies to pre-production ilk machines.
Since the registers we're touching here are rather undocumented and
might be harmful on later chips, rip it out.
For the Bspec reference of this w/a look in "vol4g CPU Display
Registers [DevILK]", Section 4.1.7.1 "DP_A—DisplayPort A
Control Register", "DP_PLL_Frequency_Select".
v2: Keep a debug message as a hint in case something regresses.
Requested by Chris Wilson.
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++----------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index dc019af..ee03a45 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -862,26 +862,15 @@ static void ironlake_set_pll_edp(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int clock)
dpa_ctl &= ~DP_PLL_FREQ_MASK;
if (clock < 200000) {
- u32 temp;
+ /* For a long time we've carried around a ILK-DevA w/a for the
+ * 160MHz clock. If we're really unlucky, it's still required.
+ */
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("160MHz cpu eDP clock, might need ilk devA w/a\n");
dpa_ctl |= DP_PLL_FREQ_160MHZ;
- /* workaround for 160Mhz:
- 1) program 0x4600c bits 15:0 = 0x8124
- 2) program 0x46010 bit 0 = 1
- 3) program 0x46034 bit 24 = 1
- 4) program 0x64000 bit 14 = 1
- */
- temp = I915_READ(0x4600c);
- temp &= 0xffff0000;
- I915_WRITE(0x4600c, temp | 0x8124);
-
- temp = I915_READ(0x46010);
- I915_WRITE(0x46010, temp | 1);
-
- temp = I915_READ(0x46034);
- I915_WRITE(0x46034, temp | (1 << 24));
} else {
dpa_ctl |= DP_PLL_FREQ_270MHZ;
}
+
I915_WRITE(DP_A, dpa_ctl);
POSTING_READ(DP_A);
--
1.7.11.7
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-29 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-29 14:59 [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: rip out pre-DDI stuff from haswell_crtc_mode_set Daniel Vetter
2012-11-29 14:59 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: move set_pll_edp to intel_dp.c Daniel Vetter
2012-11-29 14:59 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-11-29 14:59 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: use wait_for_vblank instead of msleep(17) Daniel Vetter
2012-11-29 14:59 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: WARN on !crtc in intel_dp_link_down Daniel Vetter
2012-11-29 14:59 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: drop unnecessary clearing of pch dp transcoder timings Daniel Vetter
2012-12-03 15:45 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-29 14:59 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: extract common link_m_n helpers Daniel Vetter
2012-12-03 15:33 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-12-06 13:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-29 14:59 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: don't call update_watermark in crtc_mode_set Daniel Vetter
2012-11-29 14:59 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: don't call update_watermarks from haswell enable/disable code Daniel Vetter
2012-11-29 14:59 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: rip out update_linetime_wm abstraction Daniel Vetter
2012-12-04 17:34 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-12-05 11:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-12-03 15:03 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: rip out pre-DDI stuff from haswell_crtc_mode_set Paulo Zanoni
2012-12-03 16:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-12-06 13:25 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1354201179-14975-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox