Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: split out intel_pnv_find_best_PLL
Date: Sat,  1 Jun 2013 17:16:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1370099783-20328-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370099783-20328-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Pineview is just different.

Also split out i9xx_clock from intel_clock and drop the now redundant
struct device * parameter.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index ffdf511..7b0b16b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -97,10 +97,13 @@ intel_find_best_PLL(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 		    int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
 		    intel_clock_t *best_clock);
 static bool
+intel_pnv_find_best_PLL(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
+			int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
+			intel_clock_t *best_clock);
+static bool
 intel_g4x_find_best_PLL(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 			int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
 			intel_clock_t *best_clock);
-
 static bool
 intel_vlv_find_best_pll(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 			int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
@@ -246,7 +249,7 @@ static const intel_limit_t intel_limits_pineview_sdvo = {
 	.p1 = { .min = 1, .max = 8 },
 	.p2 = { .dot_limit = 200000,
 		.p2_slow = 10, .p2_fast = 5 },
-	.find_pll = intel_find_best_PLL,
+	.find_pll = intel_pnv_find_best_PLL,
 };
 
 static const intel_limit_t intel_limits_pineview_lvds = {
@@ -260,7 +263,7 @@ static const intel_limit_t intel_limits_pineview_lvds = {
 	.p1 = { .min = 1, .max = 8 },
 	.p2 = { .dot_limit = 112000,
 		.p2_slow = 14, .p2_fast = 14 },
-	.find_pll = intel_find_best_PLL,
+	.find_pll = intel_pnv_find_best_PLL,
 };
 
 /* Ironlake / Sandybridge
@@ -475,12 +478,8 @@ static uint32_t i9xx_dpll_compute_m(struct dpll *dpll)
 	return 5 * (dpll->m1 + 2) + (dpll->m2 + 2);
 }
 
-static void intel_clock(struct drm_device *dev, int refclk, intel_clock_t *clock)
+static void i9xx_clock(int refclk, intel_clock_t *clock)
 {
-	if (IS_PINEVIEW(dev)) {
-		pineview_clock(refclk, clock);
-		return;
-	}
 	clock->m = i9xx_dpll_compute_m(clock);
 	clock->p = clock->p1 * clock->p2;
 	clock->vco = refclk * clock->m / (clock->n + 2);
@@ -541,7 +540,68 @@ static bool
 intel_find_best_PLL(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 		    int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
 		    intel_clock_t *best_clock)
+{
+	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
+	intel_clock_t clock;
+	int err = target;
+
+	if (intel_pipe_has_type(crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS)) {
+		/*
+		 * For LVDS just rely on its current settings for dual-channel.
+		 * We haven't figured out how to reliably set up different
+		 * single/dual channel state, if we even can.
+		 */
+		if (intel_is_dual_link_lvds(dev))
+			clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast;
+		else
+			clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_slow;
+	} else {
+		if (target < limit->p2.dot_limit)
+			clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_slow;
+		else
+			clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast;
+	}
+
+	memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock));
+
+	for (clock.m1 = limit->m1.min; clock.m1 <= limit->m1.max;
+	     clock.m1++) {
+		for (clock.m2 = limit->m2.min;
+		     clock.m2 <= limit->m2.max; clock.m2++) {
+			/* m1 is always 0 in Pineview */
+			if (clock.m2 >= clock.m1 && !IS_PINEVIEW(dev))
+				break;
+			for (clock.n = limit->n.min;
+			     clock.n <= limit->n.max; clock.n++) {
+				for (clock.p1 = limit->p1.min;
+					clock.p1 <= limit->p1.max; clock.p1++) {
+					int this_err;
 
+					i9xx_clock(refclk, &clock);
+					if (!intel_PLL_is_valid(dev, limit,
+								&clock))
+						continue;
+					if (match_clock &&
+					    clock.p != match_clock->p)
+						continue;
+
+					this_err = abs(clock.dot - target);
+					if (this_err < err) {
+						*best_clock = clock;
+						err = this_err;
+					}
+				}
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return (err != target);
+}
+
+static bool
+intel_pnv_find_best_PLL(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
+			int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
+			intel_clock_t *best_clock)
 {
 	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
 	intel_clock_t clock;
@@ -579,7 +639,7 @@ intel_find_best_PLL(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 					clock.p1 <= limit->p1.max; clock.p1++) {
 					int this_err;
 
-					intel_clock(dev, refclk, &clock);
+					pineview_clock(refclk, &clock);
 					if (!intel_PLL_is_valid(dev, limit,
 								&clock))
 						continue;
@@ -638,7 +698,7 @@ intel_g4x_find_best_PLL(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 				     clock.p1 >= limit->p1.min; clock.p1--) {
 					int this_err;
 
-					intel_clock(dev, refclk, &clock);
+					i9xx_clock(refclk, &clock);
 					if (!intel_PLL_is_valid(dev, limit,
 								&clock))
 						continue;
@@ -6909,8 +6969,10 @@ static int intel_crtc_clock_get(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_crtc *crtc)
 			return 0;
 		}
 
-		/* XXX: Handle the 100Mhz refclk */
-		intel_clock(dev, 96000, &clock);
+		if (IS_PINEVIEW(dev))
+			pineview_clock(96000, &clock);
+		else
+			i9xx_clock(96000, &clock);
 	} else {
 		bool is_lvds = (pipe == 1) && (I915_READ(LVDS) & LVDS_PORT_EN);
 
@@ -6922,9 +6984,9 @@ static int intel_crtc_clock_get(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_crtc *crtc)
 			if ((dpll & PLL_REF_INPUT_MASK) ==
 			    PLLB_REF_INPUT_SPREADSPECTRUMIN) {
 				/* XXX: might not be 66MHz */
-				intel_clock(dev, 66000, &clock);
+				i9xx_clock(66000, &clock);
 			} else
-				intel_clock(dev, 48000, &clock);
+				i9xx_clock(48000, &clock);
 		} else {
 			if (dpll & PLL_P1_DIVIDE_BY_TWO)
 				clock.p1 = 2;
@@ -6937,7 +6999,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_clock_get(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_crtc *crtc)
 			else
 				clock.p2 = 2;
 
-			intel_clock(dev, 48000, &clock);
+			i9xx_clock(48000, &clock);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
1.7.11.7

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-01 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-01 15:16 [PATCH 0/7] adjusted mode rework and assorted patches Daniel Vetter
2013-06-01 15:16 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2013-06-03 14:16   ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: split out intel_pnv_find_best_PLL Paulo Zanoni
2013-06-03 18:26     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-01 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: move find_pll callback to dev_priv->display Daniel Vetter
2013-06-03 14:35   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-06-03 18:36     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-03 18:56     ` [PATCH 1/2] " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-03 18:56       ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: fold in IS_PNV checks from the split up find_dpll functions Daniel Vetter
2013-06-03 21:28         ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-06-03 19:22       ` [PATCH] drm/i915: move find_pll callback to dev_priv->display Daniel Vetter
2013-06-03 20:40         ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-03 21:26           ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-06-01 15:16 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: clear up the fdi dotclock semantics for M/N computation Daniel Vetter
2013-06-03 15:59   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-06-03 16:39     ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-06-03 18:28       ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-01 15:16 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: refactor cpu eDP PLL handling a bit Daniel Vetter
2013-06-03 16:14   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-06-01 15:16 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: store adjusted dotclock in adjusted_mode->clock Daniel Vetter
2013-06-03 16:54   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-06-03 16:56     ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-06-04 12:01     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-01 15:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Drop some no longer required mode/adjusted_mode parameters Daniel Vetter
2013-06-03 17:00   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-06-01 15:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: check for strange pfit pipe assignemnt on ivb/hsw Daniel Vetter
2013-06-03 17:08   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-06-04 12:08     ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1370099783-20328-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox