From: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: extract hsw_power_well_post_{enable, disable}
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:50:09 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386795010-1635-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386795010-1635-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
I want to add more code to the post_enable function.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index c01d08d..ce2a188 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -5682,12 +5682,53 @@ bool intel_display_power_enabled(struct drm_device *dev,
return is_enabled;
}
+static void hsw_power_well_post_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
+ unsigned long irqflags;
+
+ if (IS_BROADWELL(dev)) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
+ I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_B),
+ dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B]);
+ I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_B),
+ ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B] |
+ GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK);
+ I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_C),
+ dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C]);
+ I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C),
+ ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C] |
+ GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK);
+ POSTING_READ(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C));
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
+ }
+}
+
+static void hsw_power_well_post_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
+ enum pipe p;
+ unsigned long irqflags;
+
+ /*
+ * After this, the registers on the pipes that are part of the power
+ * well will become zero, so we have to adjust our counters according to
+ * that.
+ *
+ * FIXME: Should we do this in general in drm_vblank_post_modeset?
+ */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
+ for_each_pipe(p)
+ if (p != PIPE_A)
+ dev->vblank[p].last = 0;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
+}
+
static void hsw_set_power_well(struct drm_device *dev,
struct i915_power_well *power_well, bool enable)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
bool is_enabled, enable_requested;
- unsigned long irqflags;
uint32_t tmp;
WARN_ON(dev_priv->pc8.enabled);
@@ -5708,42 +5749,14 @@ static void hsw_set_power_well(struct drm_device *dev,
DRM_ERROR("Timeout enabling power well\n");
}
- if (IS_BROADWELL(dev)) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
- I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_B),
- dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B]);
- I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_B),
- ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B] |
- GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK);
- I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_C),
- dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C]);
- I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C),
- ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C] |
- GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK);
- POSTING_READ(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C));
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
- }
+ hsw_power_well_post_enable(dev_priv);
} else {
if (enable_requested) {
- enum pipe p;
-
I915_WRITE(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER, 0);
POSTING_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER);
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Requesting to disable the power well\n");
- /*
- * After this, the registers on the pipes that are part
- * of the power well will become zero, so we have to
- * adjust our counters according to that.
- *
- * FIXME: Should we do this in general in
- * drm_vblank_post_modeset?
- */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
- for_each_pipe(p)
- if (p != PIPE_A)
- dev->vblank[p].last = 0;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
+ hsw_power_well_post_disable(dev_priv);
}
}
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-11 20:50 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: remove i915_disable_vga_mem declaration Paulo Zanoni
2013-12-11 20:50 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2013-12-12 11:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: extract hsw_power_well_post_{enable, disable} Damien Lespiau
2013-12-11 20:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: touch VGA MSR after we enable the power well Paulo Zanoni
2013-12-12 11:36 ` Damien Lespiau
2013-12-12 12:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-12 11:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: remove i915_disable_vga_mem declaration Damien Lespiau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1386795010-1635-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com \
--to=przanoni@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox