From: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/eDP: Move pps_lock() and edp_panel_vdd_on() to top
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:16:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1416849387-20984-6-git-send-email-eich@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416849387-20984-1-git-send-email-eich@suse.de>
On eDP each low level transfer is wrapped by pps_lock()/unlock()
and edp_panel_vdd_on()/off(). Since PPS locking can be quite expensive
and each call to master_xfer() or dpcd_access() may call these low level
transfer functions many times it may introduce a considerable delay.
Move locking/VDD enablement to the top so that it is performed only
once per master_xfer() or dpcd_access().
This fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86201
Signed-off-by: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 5 ++
2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index a24c8cc7..164f80e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -807,19 +807,6 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
uint32_t status;
int try, clock = 0;
bool has_aux_irq = HAS_AUX_IRQ(dev);
- bool vdd = false;
-
- if (is_edp(intel_dp)) {
- pps_lock(intel_dp);
-
- /*
- * We will be called with VDD already enabled for dpcd/edid/oui reads.
- * In such cases we want to leave VDD enabled and it's up to upper layers
- * to turn it off. But for eg. i2c-dev access we need to turn it on/off
- * ourselves.
- */
- vdd = edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
- }
/* dp aux is extremely sensitive to irq latency, hence request the
* lowest possible wakeup latency and so prevent the cpu from going into
@@ -926,13 +913,6 @@ out:
pm_qos_update_request(&dev_priv->pm_qos, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
intel_aux_display_runtime_put(dev_priv);
- if (is_edp(intel_dp)) {
- if (vdd)
- edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, false);
-
- pps_unlock(intel_dp);
- }
-
return ret;
}
@@ -1001,6 +981,97 @@ intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
return ret;
}
+int intel_edp_dpcd_access(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, u8 request,
+ unsigned int offset, void *buffer, size_t size)
+{
+ struct intel_dp *intel_dp = container_of(aux, struct intel_dp, aux);
+ bool vdd = false;
+ int ret;
+
+ pps_lock(intel_dp);
+ /*
+ * We will be called with VDD already enabled for dpcd/edid/oui reads.
+ * In such cases we want to leave VDD enabled and it's up to upper
+ * layers to turn it off. But for eg. i2c-dev access we need to turn
+ * it on/off ourselves.
+ */
+ vdd = edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
+
+ ret = drm_dp_dpcd_access(aux, request, offset, buffer, size);
+
+ if (vdd)
+ edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, false);
+
+ pps_unlock(intel_dp);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int
+intel_edp_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
+ int num)
+{
+ struct drm_dp_aux *aux = adapter->algo_data;
+ struct intel_dp *intel_dp = container_of(aux, struct intel_dp, aux);
+ bool vdd = false;
+ int ret;
+
+ pps_lock(intel_dp);
+ /*
+ * We will be called with VDD already enabled for dpcd/edid/oui reads.
+ * In such cases we want to leave VDD enabled and it's up to upper
+ * layers to turn it off. But for eg. i2c-dev access we need to turn
+ * it on/off ourselves.
+ */
+ vdd = edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
+
+ ret = drm_dp_i2c_xfer(adapter, msgs, num);
+
+ if (vdd)
+ edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, false);
+
+ pps_unlock(intel_dp);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static u32 intel_edp_i2c_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
+{
+ return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL |
+ I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BLOCK_DATA |
+ I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_PROC_CALL |
+ I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR;
+}
+
+static const struct i2c_algorithm intel_edp_i2c_algo = {
+ .functionality = intel_edp_i2c_functionality,
+ .master_xfer = intel_edp_i2c_xfer,
+};
+
+/*
+ * intel_edp_aux_register() - Intel replacement for
+ * drm_dp_aux_register().
+ */
+static int intel_edp_aux_register(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
+{
+ mutex_init(&aux->hw_mutex);
+ aux->dpcd_access = intel_edp_dpcd_access;
+
+ aux->ddc.algo = &intel_edp_i2c_algo;
+ aux->ddc.algo_data = aux;
+ aux->ddc.retries = 3;
+
+ aux->ddc.class = I2C_CLASS_DDC;
+ aux->ddc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ aux->ddc.dev.parent = aux->dev;
+ aux->ddc.dev.of_node = aux->dev->of_node;
+
+ strlcpy(aux->ddc.name, aux->name ? aux->name : dev_name(aux->dev),
+ sizeof(aux->ddc.name));
+
+ return i2c_add_adapter(&aux->ddc);
+}
+
static void
intel_dp_aux_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct intel_connector *connector)
{
@@ -1050,7 +1121,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct intel_connector *connector)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("registering %s bus for %s\n", name,
connector->base.kdev->kobj.name);
- ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&intel_dp->aux);
+ if (!is_edp(intel_dp))
+ ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&intel_dp->aux);
+ else
+ ret = intel_edp_aux_register(&intel_dp->aux);
if (ret < 0) {
DRM_ERROR("drm_dp_aux_register() for %s failed (%d)\n",
name, ret);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 44b153c5..783261a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -589,6 +589,11 @@ struct intel_dp {
uint8_t psr_dpcd[EDP_PSR_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE];
uint8_t downstream_ports[DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS];
struct drm_dp_aux aux;
+ struct i2c_algorithm ddc_algo;
+ int (*aux_master_xfer)(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
+ int num);
+ int (*dpcd_access)(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, u8 request,
+ unsigned int offset, void *buffer, size_t size);
uint8_t train_set[4];
int panel_power_up_delay;
int panel_power_down_delay;
--
1.8.4.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-24 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-24 17:16 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915 Avoid long delays when reading EDID on eDP Egbert Eich
2014-11-24 17:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Try to avoid pps_{lock, unlock}() on DP ports Egbert Eich
2014-11-24 18:28 ` Jani Nikula
2014-11-24 17:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/DP: Create pointer to generic DPCD access function Egbert Eich
2014-11-24 17:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/DP: Export drm_dp_i2c_xfer() DP helper function Egbert Eich
2014-11-24 17:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/DP: Export drm_dp_dpcd_access() " Egbert Eich
2014-11-24 17:16 ` Egbert Eich [this message]
2014-11-25 9:08 ` [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915 Avoid long delays when reading EDID on eDP Jani Nikula
2014-11-25 13:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-11-25 17:20 ` Egbert Eich
2014-11-26 8:57 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1416849387-20984-6-git-send-email-eich@suse.de \
--to=eich@suse.de \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox