From: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] Check pixel clock when setting mode
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:08:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1439806109.3767.13.camel@sorvi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150814131330.GS17734@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 15:13 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 01:03:20PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > From EDID we can read and request higher pixel clock than
> > our HW can support. This set of patches add checks if
> > requested pixel clock is lower than the one supported by the HW.
> > The requested mode is discarded if we cannot support the requested
> > pixel clock. For example for Cherryview
> >
> > 'cvt 2560 1600 60' gives
> >
> > # 2560x1600 59.99 Hz (CVT 4.10MA) hsync: 99.46 kHz; pclk: 348.50 MHz
> > Modeline "2560x1600_60.00" 348.50 2560 2760 3032 3504 1600 1603 1609 1658 -hsync +vsync
> >
> > where pixel clock 348.50 MHz is higher than the supported 304 MHz.
> >
> > The checks are implemented for DisplayPort, HDMI, LVDS, DVO, SDVO, DSI,
> > CRT, TV, and DP-MST.
> >
> > V2:
> > - The maximum DOT clock frequency is added to debugfs i915_frequency_info.
> > - max dotclock cached in dev_priv structure
> > - moved computation of max dotclock to 'intel_display.c'
> >
> > V3:
> > - intel_update_max_dotclk() renamed as intel_compute_max_dotclk()
> > - for GEN9 and above the max dotclock frequency is equal to CD clock
> > frequency
> > - for older generations the dot clock frequency is limited to 90% of the
> > CD clock frequency
> > - For Cherryview the dot clock is limited to 95% of CD clock frequency
> > - for GEN2/3 the maximum dot clock frequency is limited to 90% of the
> > 2X CD clock frequency as we have on option to use double wide mode
> > - cleanup
> >
> > V4:
> > - renaming of max_dotclk as max_dotclk_freq in dev_priv (i915_drv.h)
> > caused changes to all patches in my series even though some of them has
> > been r-b'd by Ville
> > - for consistency the max_pixclk variable is renamed as max_dotclk throughout
> > the whole series
>
> One thing that was completely missed here is testcases? Do they exist?
> -Daniel
Yes, the testcases are still missing.
-Mika-
> >
> > Mika Kahola (11):
> > drm/i915: Store max dotclock
> > drm/i915: DisplayPort pixel clock check
> > drm/i915: HDMI pixel clock check
> > drm/i915: LVDS pixel clock check
> > drm/i915: SDVO pixel clock check
> > drm/i915: DSI pixel clock check
> > drm/i915: CRT pixel clock check
> > drm/i915: TV pixel clock check
> > drm/i915: DisplayPort-MST pixel clock check
> > drm/i915: DVO pixel clock check
> > drm/i915: Max DOT clock frequency to debugfs
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c | 4 ++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 3 ++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c | 5 +++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 3 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c | 3 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 8 ++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 4 ++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c | 4 ++++
> > 12 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-17 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-14 10:03 [PATCH v4 00/11] Check pixel clock when setting mode Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] drm/i915: Store max dotclock Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 12:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-14 12:59 ` Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] drm/i915: DisplayPort pixel clock check Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] drm/i915: HDMI " Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] drm/i915: LVDS " Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 13:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-14 13:24 ` Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 20:10 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-08-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] drm/i915: SDVO " Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] drm/i915: DSI " Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 12:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] drm/i915: CRT " Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] drm/i915: TV " Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] drm/i915: DisplayPort-MST " Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] drm/i915: DVO " Mika Kahola
2015-08-14 13:10 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] drm/i915: Max DOT clock frequency to debugfs Mika Kahola
2015-08-16 4:07 ` shuang.he
2015-08-14 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] Check pixel clock when setting mode Daniel Vetter
2015-08-17 10:08 ` Mika Kahola [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1439806109.3767.13.camel@sorvi \
--to=mika.kahola@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox