From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] tests/gem_eio: New ABI - no EIO even from wait_ioctl
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:34:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448537675-481-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
So there's 3 competing proposals for what wait_ioctl should do wrt
-EIO:
- return -EIO when the gpu is wedged. Not terribly useful for
userspace since it might race with a hang and then there's no
guarantee that a subsequent execbuf won't end up in an -EIO.
Terminally wedge really can only be reliably signalled at execbuf
time, and userspace needs to cope with that (or decide not to
bother).
- EIO for any obj that suffered from a reset. This means big internal
reorginazation in the kernel since currently we track reset stats
per-ctx and not on the obj. That's also what arb robustness wants.
We could do this, but this feels like new ABI territory with the
usual userspace requirements and high hurdles.
- No -EIO at all. Consistent with set_domain_ioctl and simplest to
implement. Which is what this patch does.
We can always opt to change this later on if there's a real need.
To make the test really exercise this do a full wedged gpu hang, to
make sure -EIO doesn't leak out at all.
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
tests/gem_eio.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_eio.c b/tests/gem_eio.c
index a24c8f1c53b5..8345d1a7a429 100644
--- a/tests/gem_eio.c
+++ b/tests/gem_eio.c
@@ -161,10 +161,14 @@ static void test_wait(int fd)
{
igt_hang_ring_t hang;
+ igt_require(i915_reset_control(false));
+
hang = igt_hang_ring(fd, I915_EXEC_DEFAULT);
- igt_assert_eq(__gem_wait(fd, hang.handle, -1), -EIO);
+ igt_assert_eq(__gem_wait(fd, hang.handle, -1), 0);
igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang);
+ igt_assert(i915_reset_control(true));
+
trigger_reset(fd);
}
--
2.1.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-26 11:34 Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-11-26 11:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] tests/gem_eio: Resilience against "hanging too fast" Daniel Vetter
2015-11-26 12:59 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-26 14:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-26 15:34 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-26 15:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-26 21:10 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-30 8:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-30 10:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] tests/gem_eio: New ABI - no EIO even from wait_ioctl Chris Wilson
2015-12-01 8:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-01 9:04 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-01 9:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-01 9:20 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-03 8:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-03 9:00 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 13:48 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448537675-481-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox