From: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Ignore transcoder B/C on LPT/WPT FIFO underrun handling
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:55:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448571353-4357-2-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448571353-4357-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
LPT/WPT only have transcoder A, so we shouldn't look at FIFO underruns
for transocoder B/C. And more importnatnly we should not consider
the state of underrun reporting for transcoders B/C when checking
whether we can enable the south error interrupt.
The whole thing is a bit of mess since we store the underrun reporting
state for transcoder A under intel_crtc for pipe A, irrespective of
which pipe may actually be driving the transcoder. But I figured trying
to change that would result in more churn.
Caveat: Still untested
v2: Use HAS_PCH_LPT_H instead of HAS_DDI
Use cpt_check_pch_fifo_underruns() on LPT-H/WPT-H too
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
index bda526660e20..3d3acc8b8367 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
@@ -48,6 +48,14 @@
* The code also supports underrun detection on the PCH transcoder.
*/
+static bool cpt_transcoder_exists(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ enum transcoder pch_transcoder)
+{
+ /* LPT-H/WPT-H have only transcoder A */
+ return HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv) ||
+ (HAS_PCH_LPT_H(dev_priv) && pch_transcoder == TRANSCODER_A);
+}
+
static bool ivb_can_enable_err_int(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
@@ -69,13 +77,16 @@ static bool ivb_can_enable_err_int(struct drm_device *dev)
static bool cpt_can_enable_serr_int(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
- enum pipe pipe;
- struct intel_crtc *crtc;
+ enum transcoder pch_transcoder;
assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
- for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
- crtc = to_intel_crtc(dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]);
+ for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pch_transcoder) {
+ struct intel_crtc *crtc =
+ to_intel_crtc(dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pch_transcoder]);
+
+ if (!cpt_transcoder_exists(dev_priv, pch_transcoder))
+ continue;
if (crtc->pch_fifo_underrun_disabled)
return false;
@@ -206,6 +217,9 @@ static void cpt_check_pch_fifo_underruns(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
+ if (!cpt_transcoder_exists(dev_priv, pch_transcoder))
+ return;
+
if ((serr_int & SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN(pch_transcoder)) == 0)
return;
@@ -222,6 +236,9 @@ static void cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct drm_device *dev,
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+ if (!cpt_transcoder_exists(dev_priv, pch_transcoder))
+ return;
+
if (enable) {
I915_WRITE(SERR_INT,
SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN(pch_transcoder));
@@ -436,7 +453,7 @@ void intel_check_pch_fifo_underruns(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
if (crtc->pch_fifo_underrun_disabled)
continue;
- if (HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv))
+ if (HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_LPT_H(dev_priv))
cpt_check_pch_fifo_underruns(crtc);
}
--
2.4.10
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 15:11 [PATCH] drm/i915: Ignore transcoder B/C on LPT/WPT FIFO underrun handling ville.syrjala
2015-11-25 15:17 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-26 20:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Add HAS_PCH_LPT_H() ville.syrjala
2015-11-26 20:55 ` ville.syrjala [this message]
2015-11-30 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Ignore transcoder B/C on LPT/WPT FIFO underrun handling Daniel Vetter
2015-11-30 14:08 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-30 14:16 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448571353-4357-2-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox