From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Ankitprasad Sharma <ankitprasad.r.sharma@intel.com>,
drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Add missing rpm wakelock to GGTT pread
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 11:41:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470300076.3633.21.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470298193-21765-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On to, 2016-08-04 at 09:09 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Joonas spotted a discrepancy between the pwrite and pread ioctls, in
> that pwrite takes the rpm wakelock around its GGTT access, The wakelock
> is required in order for the GTT to function. In disregard for the
> current convention, we take the rpm wakelock around the access itself
> rather than around the struct_mutex as the nesting is not strictly
> required and such ordering will one day be fixed by explicitly noting
> the barrier dependencies between the GGTT and rpm.
>
> Fixes: b50a53715f09 ("drm/i915: Support for pread/pwrite ...")
> Reported-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Ankitprasad Sharma <ankitprasad.r.sharma@intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 9bef2c0803a5..9cb838ef8d02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -887,9 +887,12 @@ i915_gem_pread_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> ret = i915_gem_shmem_pread(dev, obj, args, file);
>
> /* pread for non shmem backed objects */
> - if (ret == -EFAULT || ret == -ENODEV)
> + if (ret == -EFAULT || ret == -ENODEV) {
> + intel_runtime_pm_get(to_i915(dev));
> ret = i915_gem_gtt_pread(dev, obj, args->size,
> args->offset, args->data_ptr);
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(to_i915(dev));
> + }
>
> out:
> i915_gem_object_put(obj);
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-04 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 8:09 [PATCH] drm/i915: Add missing rpm wakelock to GGTT pread Chris Wilson
2016-08-04 8:41 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2016-08-04 10:13 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470300076.3633.21.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankitprasad.r.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox