public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/gen9: Increase PCODE request timeout to 50ms
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:32:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487946730-17162-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487604584-30926-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>

After
commit 2c7d0602c815277f7cb7c932b091288710d8aba7
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 5 18:27:37 2016 +0200

    drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during CDCLK change notification

there is still one report of the CDCLK-change request timing out on a
KBL machine, see the Reference link. On that machine the maximum time
the request took to succeed was 34ms, so increase the timeout to 50ms.

v2:
- Change timeout from 100 to 50 ms to maintain the current 50 ms limit
  for atomic waits in the driver. (Chris, Tvrtko)

Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99345
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 169c490..e7d4c2a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -7909,10 +7909,10 @@ static bool skl_pcode_try_request(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mbox,
  * @timeout_base_ms: timeout for polling with preemption enabled
  *
  * Keep resending the @request to @mbox until PCODE acknowledges it, PCODE
- * reports an error or an overall timeout of @timeout_base_ms+10 ms expires.
+ * reports an error or an overall timeout of @timeout_base_ms+50 ms expires.
  * The request is acknowledged once the PCODE reply dword equals @reply after
  * applying @reply_mask. Polling is first attempted with preemption enabled
- * for @timeout_base_ms and if this times out for another 10 ms with
+ * for @timeout_base_ms and if this times out for another 50 ms with
  * preemption disabled.
  *
  * Returns 0 on success, %-ETIMEDOUT in case of a timeout, <0 in case of some
@@ -7948,14 +7948,15 @@ int skl_pcode_request(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mbox, u32 request,
 	 * worst case) _and_ PCODE was busy for some reason even after a
 	 * (queued) request and @timeout_base_ms delay. As a workaround retry
 	 * the poll with preemption disabled to maximize the number of
-	 * requests. Increase the timeout from @timeout_base_ms to 10ms to
+	 * requests. Increase the timeout from @timeout_base_ms to 50ms to
 	 * account for interrupts that could reduce the number of these
-	 * requests.
+	 * requests, and for any quirks of the PCODE firmware that delays
+	 * the request completion.
 	 */
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PCODE timeout, retrying with preemption disabled\n");
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(timeout_base_ms > 3);
 	preempt_disable();
-	ret = wait_for_atomic(COND, 10);
+	ret = wait_for_atomic(COND, 50);
 	preempt_enable();
 
 out:
-- 
2.5.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-24 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-20 15:29 [PATCH] drm/i915/gen9: Increase PCODE request timeout to 100ms Imre Deak
2017-02-20 16:05 ` Chris Wilson
2017-02-21  9:22   ` Imre Deak
2017-02-21  9:37     ` Chris Wilson
2017-02-21 10:06       ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-02-21 12:43         ` Imre Deak
2017-02-21 13:11           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-02-21 14:13             ` [Intel-gfx] " Imre Deak
2017-02-21 14:16               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-02-21 13:19           ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2017-02-21 14:18             ` Imre Deak
2017-02-20 17:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-02-24 14:32 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2017-02-24 15:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/gen9: Increase PCODE request timeout to 100ms (rev2) Patchwork
2017-02-24 19:18   ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-01 11:17   ` Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1487946730-17162-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox