From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop verbose and archaic "ring" from our internal engine names
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:23:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490876605.3067.8.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170329220407.30642-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On ke, 2017-03-29 at 23:04 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We pretty print the name of an engine in several places, mostly for
> debug, but also in the GPU hang report. Using "ring" in the name is
> archaic (we call those engines now to differentiate them from the
> multiple rings of commands we execute on each engine), quite verbose and
> often tautological. We run out of room in our GPU hang report for
> instance if we have more than a couple of engines hung simultaneously.
> Bit the bullet and update the strings to reflect the common internal names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
<SNIP>
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static const struct engine_info {
> int (*init_execlists)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> } intel_engines[] = {
> [RCS] = {
> - .name = "render ring",
> + .name = "rcs",
> .uabi_id = I915_EXEC_RENDER,
> .hw_id = RCS_HW,
Lift the .hw_id after .name now that it's the more closely related.
With that applied to each;
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-30 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-29 22:04 [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop verbose and archaic "ring" from our internal engine names Chris Wilson
2017-03-30 12:23 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2017-03-30 13:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-03-31 7:59 ` Mika Kuoppala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1490876605.3067.8.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox