From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Weinan Li <weinan.z.li@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: return the actual aperture size under gvt environment
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:19:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491992363.3274.21.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170412085355.GG4250@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On ke, 2017-04-12 at 09:53 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:36:57PM +0800, Weinan Li wrote:
> >
> > I915_GEM_GET_APERTURE ioctl is used to probe aperture size from userspace.
> > Some applications like OpenCL use this information to know how much GM
> > resource can it use.
>
> That's a userspace bug.
Yes, a new property might be in place. I don't think we can go and
change the meaning of a parameter just like that.
<SNIP>
> > @@ -116,6 +121,14 @@ void intel_vgt_deballoon(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > memset(&bl_info, 0, sizeof(bl_info));
> > }
> >
> > +size_t intel_vgt_reserved_size_by_balloon(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +{
> > + if (!intel_vgpu_active(dev_priv))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return bl_info.reserved_total;
> > +}
>
> Or just return bl_info.reserved_total.
>
> Why is there a global here anyway?
>
> Better would be to track dev_priv->ggtt.reserved
>
> Then the core code becomes
> gtt_size = dev_priv->ggtt.total - dev_priv->ggtt.reserved;
>
> and doesn't need to know the identity of every possible consumer.
I was writing an e-mail about the same thing. So +1 on the idea.
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-12 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-12 8:36 [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: return the actual aperture size under gvt environment Weinan Li
2017-04-12 8:53 ` Chris Wilson
2017-04-12 10:19 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2017-04-13 1:01 ` Li, Weinan Z
2017-04-13 10:11 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-04-14 7:33 ` Li, Weinan Z
2017-04-12 10:13 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491992363.3274.21.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=weinan.z.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox